STUDresearch · Non-peptide
Bimagrumab
Also known as
BYM338 · bima
Community talk. May be wrong. Not medical advice. Not a protocol. Not for human or animal use.
Systemic antibody against activin receptor pathway.
NCT05616013 used protocol-defined visits rather than a simple continuous monthly calendar.
Three fixed bolus arms, 12 weekly doses in a controlled Phase 1 study of adults aged at least 70; separate from the IV arms and SC-infusion formulations.
Half-life & effect duration
- Half-life in the body
- IV · high concentrationsAbout 19 days
- IV · fastest clearanceAbout 5 days
- Felt duration people report
- Felt durationNo consistent firsthand window reported
- Observed during studiesMuscle spasms, rash or digestive effects; body changes assessed over weeks
Tap a line to jump into the full notes. Research only — may be wrong.
Timing context & sources
Half-life in the body
Sponsor documentation reports roughly 5–19 days after human IV administration, depending on concentration.
The estimate spans maximal clearance to the high-concentration linear region. It summarizes prior human development data, not one trial cohort or one universal terminal value.
Exact estimation sample and derivation are not supplied in the cited protocol passage. Rooks's single-dose study could not derive half-life by NCA. Not SC kinetics, felt duration or a dosing instruction.
- Bimagrumab sponsor protocol — JAMA Supplement 2, human PK (opens in a new tab)Supplement 2, zoi201022supp2_prod_1614013899.27858.pdf; CBYM338X2211 amended protocol v05 clean; section 1.3.2, printed pages 36–37. Human single/repeat IV concentration-dependent half-life estimates.Sponsor synthesis of prior human IV development data. Exact estimation cohort and derivation are not supplied here; not a direct NCA estimate from the associated trial, SC kinetics or felt duration. The separate ClinicalTrials.gov protocol copy redacts this passage.
- Rooks et al. — Safety and pharmacokinetics of bimagrumab in older and obese adults (opens in a new tab)Full text Methods, Results, pharmacokinetics and adverse-events sections for single 3 or 30 mg/kg IV dosing; 12-week safety follow-up in obese adults and 20 weeks in older adults.Small single-dose studies; nonlinear PK prevented a conventional noncompartmental half-life estimate and body-composition endpoints are not subjective duration.
Felt duration people report
The reviewed evidence does not establish a dependable felt-effect window after a dose.
Studies measured adverse events and body-composition endpoints over weeks; inspected community threads contained expectations rather than verified use diaries.
Endpoint timing is not a first-person duration diary, and the community evidence set was small and access-focused.
- Rooks et al. — Safety and pharmacokinetics of bimagrumab in older and obese adults (opens in a new tab)Full text Methods, Results, pharmacokinetics and adverse-events sections for single 3 or 30 mg/kg IV dosing; 12-week safety follow-up in obese adults and 20 weeks in older adults.Small single-dose studies; nonlinear PK prevented a conventional noncompartmental half-life estimate and body-composition endpoints are not subjective duration.
- r/PeptideForum — Bimagrumab (opens in a new tab)Thread opening question and replies discussing antibody identity, market availability and trial status; no commenter reported taking it.Small discussion thread, anonymous users and absence within this thread is not proof no user report exists anywhere.
Other context in this card
- NCT03005288 amended bimagrumab protocol — redacted copy (opens in a new tab)Protocol section 1.3.2 was inspected, but the human pharmacokinetic passage is replaced by company-confidential redactions in this public copy.This copy does not substantiate the numerical 19-to-5-day range and is not associated with that claim; retained only to identify the inaccessible version.
- Garito et al. — IV and SC bimagrumab in healthy older adults (opens in a new tab)Abstract: IV every-four-week, SC infusion every-four-week and SC bolus weekly cohorts; approximately 40% SC bioavailability and body-composition results.Phase 1 controlled study in healthy older adults; not consumer product evidence and not a personal schedule.
- NCT05616013 bimagrumab plus semaglutide study record (opens in a new tab)Completed-study arms and interventions: bimagrumab 10 or 30 mg/kg IV at baseline/week 4 and weeks 16, 28, 40, 52 and 64 in selected arms; posted results record.Registry and sponsor-submitted results; regimen is protocol-specific and includes combination arms.
- r/ResearchCompounds — bimagrumab plus semaglutide discussion (opens in a new tab)Opening post and replies on muscle preservation, pricing, access and IV administration; no verified first-person use account.Expectation-focused anonymous discussion; not outcome evidence and not exhaustive of every community.
What people say
- Body-comp talk: Bimagrumab is discussed for recomp, strength continuity, or soft-tissue recovery depending on class. forum
- Training confound: PRs and scale changes almost always co-travel with diet phase and programming. anecdote
- Suppression / lipid chatter: Hormonal agents pull bloodwork and PCT conversations even when marketed “mild.” forum
- Lean mass: Trials reported increases in lean mass. trial
- Metabolic interest: Obesity/insulin-sensitivity exploration in some programs. trial
Doses people talk about
- Research-chem listings: treat unlabeled “bimagrumab” vials as high mislabel risk. forum
- Not a daily SC “peptide stack” dose: monthly/q4w-class IV monoclonal schedules dominate literature. trial
- Trial-style bands: human studies commonly used ~10–30 mg/kg IV every several weeks (exact arm depends on study) for muscle/obesity research contexts. trial
- Framing: Bimagrumab (BYM338) is a monoclonal antibody against ActRII — clinic/trial dosing, not a peptide vial culture. trial
How it may feel
- First-person evidence: The inspected community threads discussed availability, cost, IV logistics and trial expectations but contained no verified user account of taking bimagrumab. forum
- Days 2–7: Side-effect window for many agents; benefits, if any, are easy to mis-attribute. forum
- Weeks 1–2: First honest checkpoint in self-logs. forum
- Observed study effects: In a single-dose IV study, commonly reported events included muscle spasms, rash, diarrhea and upper-respiratory infection; oral and generic injection-site language does not apply to that study. trial
- Months: Antibody PK and endpoint windows are longer than daily peptides. trial
Cycles people discuss
- Unverified self-cycle discussion: Older notes describe weeks-on / weeks-off, with cost and caution offered as reasons rather than hard science. The checked threads contained no verified self-use calendar; controlled studies use protocol-defined schedules. forumtrial
- No magic cycle: There is rarely one universal “correct” on/off calendar across forums. forum
- Dosing intervals: Weeks between infusions in programs. trial
- Reassess: Stop and reassess if adverse effects appear; this is not medical care. forum
Timing
- Timing practicalities: People time doses around side effects, training, and sleep more than perfect PK. forum
- Human PK: Sponsor documentation reports a concentration-dependent half-life of about 19 days at high concentrations and about 5 days at maximum clearance after human IV administration. These program estimates are not a universal terminal half-life or a subjective-effect window; the Rooks single-dose study could not derive half-life by noncompartmental analysis. trial
- Published PK: Where human PK exists it should override forum half-life memes for Bimagrumab. trial
More on what it is
- Research posture: Educational summary of public discussion and literature themes only. forum
- How people talk about it: Forum volume is a popularity signal for Bimagrumab, not proof it works for you. forum
- What it is: Monoclonal antibody vs activin type II receptors explored for muscle mass and metabolic outcomes. trial
- Not a gray-market vial peptide: Biologic antibody — clinic/trial context, not typical research-chem pen culture. trial
- Research only: Not approved advice for self-experimentation; legality and access vary by place. forum
Stacks
- Conceptually vs myostatin drugs: Compared with other myostatin/activin axis agents. forum
- Less is clearer: Solo runs make personal n=1 easier to interpret than five-compound blasts. forum
Storage notes
- No mix instructions here: STUDresearch does not list reconstitution, diluent volumes, or syringe unit charts. People reconstitute many different ways and vial labels differ — that content creates more confusion than clarity. forum
- Storage (general talk only): Unopened research products are usually kept cool, dry, and away from light per the seller label. Anything after first use is product-specific — follow the label, not a universal forum SOP. forum
Watch for
- Access: Essentially unavailable as consumer research chem. forum
- Injection site (if injected): Redness, itch, lumps, bruise — technique and product quality matter. forum
- Unknowns: Long-term safety for gray-market preparations is often poorly characterized. forum
- Stack noise: Sides logged on multi-agent stacks cannot be blamed cleanly on one compound. forum
- Seek care red flags: Severe allergic reaction, chest pain, neuro changes, or uncontrolled BP/glucose need real medical care — not forum advice. forum
- Trial adverse events / monitoring: Earlier trial discussion flags GI and muscle-enzyme changes and lab monitoring. In the checked single-dose IV study, commonly reported events included muscle spasms, rash and diarrhea; that study does not establish the safety of unverified products. trial
