Non-peptide
Ca-AKG
Also known as
Calcium alpha-ketoglutarate · Calcium α-ketoglutarate · CaAKG · Ca AKG · Calcium aKG · AKG (calcium salt form) · dAKG (delayed-release CaAKG, product framing) · LifeAKG™ (Rejuvant / timed-release ingredient branding) · Calcium alpha-ketoglutarate monohydrate · AKG-Ca / Ca-aKG (literature variants)
Community talk. May contain inaccuracies. Not medical advice. Not a protocol. Not for human or animal use.
What it is
| Identity | Oral calcium alpha-ketoglutarate, a calcium salt of a molecule involved in cellular energy processing. |
|---|---|
| Different forms | Ca-AKG, free AKG and arginine-AKG workout powder are different forms. Liposomal and delayed-release products are not established equivalents. |
Notes
Ca-AKG is oral calcium alpha-ketoglutarate, discussed for longevity, energy and training recovery. Users describe anything from subtle improvements to no change or unwanted effects. Much of its appeal rests on biological-age tests; feeling better or getting a lower score does not establish a longer healthy life.
A calcium salt of a normal metabolic molecule. AKG participates in the Krebs cycle, the cell's energy-processing pathway, amino-acid production and DNA regulation. Ca-AKG packages it with calcium for oral supplements. These roles explain interest rather than prove slower aging. Sandalova et al. ABLE intervention study protocol (Official context · Accessed 2026-09-30)
The form matters. Longevity users distinguish Ca-AKG from free alpha-ketoglutaric acid and arginine-AKG (AAKG) workout powders. Delayed-release, monohydrate and liposomal labels describe different products; they do not establish equivalent exposure. Bodybuilding scoop amounts cannot simply become Ca-AKG amounts.
Source context — Sandalova et al. ABLE intervention study protocol: Protocol, not efficacy results. Historical dose discussion is secondary within this primary protocol. Selected 40–60-year-old population; author commercial advisory-board disclosure.
What people notice
| Energy and recovery | Some report easier running or quicker workout recovery; others report no benefit after repeated attempts. |
|---|---|
| Biological-age tests | Some use it without a noticeable feeling and follow age-test scores. A lower score does not establish a longer healthy life. |
Notes
Training recovery and everyday energy. One Biohackers commenter, after half a year, estimated 40% quicker leg recovery and less sleep needed. Another reported no benefit after two attempts. Those are personal assessments; shorter sleep is not proof of better recovery or longevity. Anyone see any benefit from Ca-akg? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Subtle performance versus no change. Biohorology reported easier late-run effort and continued use for years alongside a stack. Bull_shit_artist's two-thread nonresponse is one person's experience; their older product's calcium form was unconfirmed. What did you feel after starting AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30) · Anyone see any benefit from Ca-akg? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Aging well, even without a noticeable feeling. Some users keep Ca-AKG in their stack for biological-age tests, inflammation narratives or future health rather than an immediate buzz. Bone and muscle support are secondary interests. A flat subjective response neither proves nor disproves a long-term benefit.
Ca-AKG is oral calcium alpha-ketoglutarate, discussed for longevity, energy and training recovery. Users describe anything from subtle improvements to no change or unwanted effects. Much of its appeal rests on biological-age tests; feeling better or getting a lower score does not establish a longer healthy life.
Source context — Anyone see any benefit from Ca-akg?: Self-selected opinions and unverified outcomes, no dose in the recovery report. Bull_shit_artist also occurs in the Supplements thread and is not a second independent nonresponse.
Source context — What did you feel after starting AKG?: Anonymous reports; products unverified; several users identify free acid or unspecified AKG, not Ca-AKG. Relative comment dates only on opened page; repeated users are not independent reports.
Doses people talk about
| Oral daily discussion | 1,000–2,000 mg total daily, once or split AM/PM; some logs mention 2–3 g/day. These are Ca-AKG salt amounts, not elemental calcium. |
|---|---|
| Liposomal account | One multi-supplement log uses 600 mg/day liposomal Ca-AKG; this is not a conversion from ordinary capsules. |
| Serving and meals | A historical Rejuvant serving was two tablets totaling 1,000 mg. Meal and empty-stomach routines differ; food is discussed for stomach comfort. |
Notes
Oral: 1,000–2,000 mg total daily in existing longevity discussion. The preserved record includes once-daily and AM/PM routines; some more aggressive logs mention 2–3 g/day. These are salt amounts, not elemental calcium or proven beneficial targets. Morning, meals and empty-stomach approaches compete; food is often chosen for stomach comfort.
600 mg/day appears in a liposomal stack log. That amount belongs to one formulation and a multi-supplement experiment, not a conversion from ordinary capsules or proof of stronger absorption. Results of my protocol to reduce biological age (Personal report · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Two tablets can mean 1,000 mg altogether. Longecity corrected a Rejuvant serving-size misread: count the labeled serving, not tablets alone. This historical product-derived figure is not an independently determined human dose. Alpha-Ketoglutarate as an Anti-Aging, Anti-Frailty Compound, page 4 (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Source context — Results of my protocol to reduce biological age: Single self-experiment; stack and illness/training changes confound attribution. Post itself switches between six and eight months; headline is not independently confirmed.
Source context — Alpha-Ketoglutarate as an Anti-Aging, Anti-Frailty Compound, page 4: Historical thread mixes salts and copied quotations. Same report quoted in later post is one user. Keep salt identities and confounding; no validated cycling or human-equivalence calculation.
Half-life, onset & duration
| Felt onset | One person reported week-one energy; others use weeks 3–4 as check-ins. There is no dependable onset. |
|---|---|
| Felt duration | No reliable single-dose window or persistence after stopping is established for Ca-AKG. |
| Half-life | A measured human oral Ca-AKG value is unknown in this record. The repeated under-five-minute figure comes from portal administration in pigs. |
Notes
Days to weeks, with no dependable onset. A Ca-AKG commenter described week-one energy. Old discussion uses weeks 3–4 for check-ins; some feel nothing. These are observations, not expected responses. What did you feel after starting AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
No reliable single-dose Ca-AKG window. A Reddit report of 1–3 hours of pump/clarity omitted the AKG salt and included green tea. It cannot establish Ca-AKG's wear-off time. What did you feel after starting AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Clock changes do not tell us how long benefits persist. Users compare tests months apart, but there is no dependable community answer for retaining an effect after stopping. A lower clock score is not a measured extension of healthy life.
A measured human oral Ca-AKG half-life is unknown here. Reddit repeats five-minute lore and speculation about an hour. Neither supplies human measurements; the five-minute figure is from pig portal exposure. What did you feel after starting AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Pig kinetics explain the five-minute lore. Dąbek's 2005 study found AKG half-life below five minutes after portal-vein administration in pigs. Species, route and chemical form differ from swallowed human Ca-AKG. It cannot determine its human dose timing. AKG absorption from pig intestine and plasma pharmacokinetics (Animal context · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Source context — What did you feel after starting AKG?: Anonymous reports; products unverified; several users identify free acid or unspecified AKG, not Ca-AKG. Relative comment dates only on opened page; repeated users are not independent reports.
Source context — AKG absorption from pig intestine and plasma pharmacokinetics: Primary-study abstract only. Publication is 2005, despite older card's 2006 PubMed-style naming. Free AKG in pigs, not human oral Ca-AKG or consumer delayed-release PK.
Cycles people discuss
| Ongoing use | Daily use, 8–12-week check-ins and continuous use for 6–12 months or longer appear in discussion; these are habits rather than established courses. |
|---|---|
| Pauses | People pause for cost, travel, calcium concerns or fewer supplements. No validated loading phase or washout is established. |
Notes
Daily ongoing use and 8–12-week check-ins. The existing discussion describes short self-experiments and longer continuous use, including 6–12 months or more. Those are habits, not established courses. Some pause for cost, travel, calcium concerns or a simpler stack.
No validated loading phase or washout. Higher-starting-dose/maintenance suggestions occur in old stack-blog talk. No useful source establishes that they improve results, prevent tolerance or preserve clock changes during breaks.
Stacks
| Longevity combinations | NMN or NR appear alongside Ca-AKG, sometimes with resveratrol and TMG. One liposomal log also uses spermidine, vitamin C and NAD precursors. |
|---|---|
| Bone-oriented combinations | Vitamin D, K2 and magnesium appear in bone-focused stacks; Ca-AKG already contributes calcium. |
Notes
Stacks make the cause hard to identify. The liposomal log combined Ca-AKG with spermidine, vitamin C and NAD precursors. Existing discussion also pairs NMN/NR with resveratrol/TMG; lists rapamycin, metformin, fisetin, quercetin, urolithin A and taurine nearby; and uses D/K2/magnesium in bone-oriented stacks. Co-listing establishes neither synergy nor a required companion. Results of my protocol to reduce biological age (Personal report · Accessed 2026-09-30)
NAD stack (most common): Ca-AKG + NMN or NR — ubiquitous in Reddit r/NMN, longevity blogs, and multi-ingredient formulas; mechanistic story is “NAD+ energy + AKG TCA/epigenetic support,” not a single co-formulated RCT proving synergy. [community]
Resveratrol / TMG with NMN: When Ca-AKG is added to a Sinclair-style NMN morning stack, resveratrol and methyl-support (TMG) often come along for the NMN — not because Ca-AKG requires them. [community]
Bone-oriented pairings: Vitamin D, K2, magnesium, and dietary calcium discussion when Ca-AKG is framed for bone — remember Ca-AKG already contributes elemental calcium. [community]
Avoid double-counting calcium: Stacking Ca-AKG with separate high-dose calcium citrate/carbonate and dairy can push total calcium higher than intended. [community]
Source context — Results of my protocol to reduce biological age: Single self-experiment; stack and illness/training changes confound attribution. Post itself switches between six and eight months; headline is not independently confirmed.
Watch for
| Unwanted effects | Reports include stomach pain, fog, headache, anxiety and sleep changes; some users report no adverse effects. |
|---|---|
| Calcium totals | Ca-AKG milligrams are not calcium milligrams. Separate calcium supplements, antacids and diet also count toward total calcium. |
| Mineral context | General calcium guidance discusses stone risk and interactions with thyroid replacement and some antibiotics; Ca-AKG-specific risks are not quantified here. |
Notes
Stomach pain, anxiety and sleep changes. A Ca-AKG post describes substantial IBS-like pain; its gut-bacteria explanation is speculation. Other reports mention fog or anxiety, while some users report no adverse effects. Loose stool and poor sleep in a DoubleWood account concerned an unconfirmed calcium form. Ca-akg stomach pain (Personal report · Accessed 2026-09-30) · Does CA AKG cause anxiety for you? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30) · What did you feel after starting AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Unwanted effects may appear early. One liposomal user described good workouts followed by lunchtime fog/headache and anxiety after four days, repeating on a later attempt. Another anxiety reporter disclosed stronger coffee, complicating attribution. Does CA AKG cause anxiety for you? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Salt weight and calcium weight are different. Reddit's calcium discussion shows how the two can be confused. The cited commercial NOVOS label lists 1,100 mg Ca-AKG and 231 mg calcium per serving, within a blend. Other formulations differ. Calcium from antacids, separate supplements and diet still contributes to total intake. 1000 mg calcium takes me over my recommended amount—Ca-AKG? (Community discussion · Accessed 2026-09-30) · NOVOS Core supplement facts (Official context · Accessed 2026-09-30)
General mineral risks require context. NIH discusses possible stone risk with supplemental calcium, with conflicting study findings, and interactions with medicines including thyroid replacement and some antibiotics. Those are general calcium cautions, not quantified Ca-AKG risks or a universal spacing rule. NIH ODS Calcium health professional fact sheet (Official context · Accessed 2026-09-30)
Source context — Ca-akg stomach pain: No dose, verified product or diagnostic assessment; suggested microbiome explanation is speculation, not established cause.
Source context — Does CA AKG cause anxiety for you?: Brand-focused subreddit, anonymous mixed products and stacks. Coffee confound does not explain every report; no prevalence or mechanistic diagnosis established.
Source context — What did you feel after starting AKG?: Anonymous reports; products unverified; several users identify free acid or unspecified AKG, not Ca-AKG. Relative comment dates only on opened page; repeated users are not independent reports.
Source context — 1000 mg calcium takes me over my recommended amount—Ca-AKG?: OP body deleted. Community approximation is not a universal label ratio or medical risk estimate.
Source context — NOVOS Core supplement facts: Vendor label only; formulation can change; label is not effectiveness evidence.
Source context — NIH ODS Calcium health professional fact sheet: General calcium-supplement context, not Ca-AKG-specific interaction or stone-risk trials.
Full notes
Ca-AKG is oral calcium alpha-ketoglutarate, discussed for longevity, energy and training recovery. Users describe anything from subtle improvements to no change or unwanted effects. Much of its appeal rests on biological-age tests; feeling better or getting a lower score does not establish a longer healthy life.
What Ca-AKG is
- A calcium salt of a normal metabolic molecule. AKG participates in the Krebs cycle, the cell's energy-processing pathway, amino-acid production and DNA regulation. Ca-AKG packages it with calcium for oral supplements. These roles explain interest rather than prove slower aging. Official context
- The form matters. Longevity users distinguish Ca-AKG from free alpha-ketoglutaric acid and arginine-AKG (AAKG) workout powders. Delayed-release, monohydrate and liposomal labels describe different products; they do not establish equivalent exposure. Bodybuilding scoop amounts cannot simply become Ca-AKG amounts. Community
Benefits people seek and report
- Training recovery and everyday energy. One Biohackers commenter, after half a year, estimated 40% quicker leg recovery and less sleep needed. Another reported no benefit after two attempts. Those are personal assessments; shorter sleep is not proof of better recovery or longevity. Reddit r/Biohackers
- Aging well, even without a noticeable feeling. Some users keep Ca-AKG in their stack for biological-age tests, inflammation narratives or future health rather than an immediate buzz. Bone and muscle support are secondary interests. A flat subjective response neither proves nor disproves a long-term benefit. Community Community
Doses people discuss
1 g equals 1,000 mg. Reported use is educational context, not a regimen.
- Oral: 1,000–2,000 mg total daily in existing longevity discussion. The preserved record includes once-daily and AM/PM routines; some more aggressive logs mention 2–3 g/day. These are salt amounts, not elemental calcium or proven beneficial targets. Morning, meals and empty-stomach approaches compete; food is often chosen for stomach comfort. Community
- Two tablets can mean 1,000 mg altogether. Longecity corrected a Rejuvant serving-size misread: count the labeled serving, not tablets alone. This historical product-derived figure is not an independently determined human dose. Longecity
- 600 mg/day appears in a liposomal stack log. That amount belongs to one formulation and a multi-supplement experiment, not a conversion from ordinary capsules or proof of stronger absorption. Personal report
Half-life: claims versus what is known
- A measured human oral Ca-AKG half-life is unknown here. Reddit repeats five-minute lore and speculation about an hour. Neither supplies human measurements; the five-minute figure is from pig portal exposure. Reddit r/Supplements
- Timed release is a disputed product claim. Users disagree about its value. Tablet release, blood elimination and downstream effects are different clocks, without an established repeat-dose interval. Reddit r/Supplements Community
When people notice something
- Days to weeks, with no dependable onset. A Ca-AKG commenter described week-one energy. Old discussion uses weeks 3–4 for check-ins; some feel nothing. These are observations, not expected responses. Reddit r/Supplements Community
- Unwanted effects may appear early. One liposomal user described good workouts followed by lunchtime fog/headache and anxiety after four days, repeating on a later attempt. Another anxiety reporter disclosed stronger coffee, complicating attribution. Reddit r/Renue
How long effects may last
- No reliable single-dose Ca-AKG window. A Reddit report of 1–3 hours of pump/clarity omitted the AKG salt and included green tea. It cannot establish Ca-AKG's wear-off time. Reddit r/Supplements
- Clock changes do not tell us how long benefits persist. Users compare tests months apart, but there is no dependable community answer for retaining an effect after stopping. A lower clock score is not a measured extension of healthy life. Community Community
Courses, ongoing use and pauses
- Daily ongoing use and 8–12-week check-ins. The existing discussion describes short self-experiments and longer continuous use, including 6–12 months or more. Those are habits, not established courses. Some pause for cost, travel, calcium concerns or a simpler stack. Community
- No validated loading phase or washout. Higher-starting-dose/maintenance suggestions occur in old stack-blog talk. No useful source establishes that they improve results, prevent tolerance or preserve clock changes during breaks. Community
What to watch for
- Stomach pain, anxiety and sleep changes. A Ca-AKG post describes substantial IBS-like pain; its gut-bacteria explanation is speculation. Other reports mention fog or anxiety, while some users report no adverse effects. Loose stool and poor sleep in a DoubleWood account concerned an unconfirmed calcium form. Personal report Reddit r/Renue Reddit r/Supplements
- Salt weight and calcium weight are different. Reddit's calcium discussion shows how the two can be confused. The cited commercial NOVOS label lists 1,100 mg Ca-AKG and 231 mg calcium per serving, within a blend. Other formulations differ. Calcium from antacids, separate supplements and diet still contributes to total intake. Reddit r/Biohackers Official context Community
- General mineral risks require context. NIH discusses possible stone risk with supplemental calcium, with conflicting study findings, and interactions with medicines including thyroid replacement and some antibiotics. Those are general calcium cautions, not quantified Ca-AKG risks or a universal spacing rule. Official context
What users weigh in practice
- Subtle performance versus no change. Biohorology reported easier late-run effort and continued use for years alongside a stack. Bull_shit_artist's two-thread nonresponse is one person's experience; their older product's calcium form was unconfirmed. Reddit r/Supplements Reddit r/Biohackers
- A better clock can coexist with feeling worse. QuestforLife reported improved tests on 900 mg/day mixed Ca/Mg AKG, fatigue and a pause, then 600–900 mg/day after diet/stack changes. This cannot validate a Ca-AKG cycle. Longecity
- Stacks make the cause hard to identify. The liposomal log combined Ca-AKG with spermidine, vitamin C and NAD precursors. Existing discussion also pairs NMN/NR with resveratrol/TMG; lists rapamycin, metformin, fisetin, quercetin, urolithin A and taurine nearby; and uses D/K2/magnesium in bone-oriented stacks. Co-listing establishes neither synergy nor a required companion. Personal report Community
- Price, formulation and expectations shape decisions. Users discuss switching brands, powder cost, weighing accuracy and monohydrate versus anhydrous labels. Higher prices or delayed-release claims do not verify quality. Magnesium/evening sleep anecdotes coexist with unchanged sleep and reduced-sleep claims; they are not an established sleep benefit. Community Community Reddit r/Biohackers
What the formal evidence adds
- Pig kinetics explain the five-minute lore. Dąbek's 2005 study found AKG half-life below five minutes after portal-vein administration in pigs. Species, route and chemical form differ from swallowed human Ca-AKG. It cannot determine its human dose timing. Animal context
- The eight-year headline describes a clock result. The 2021 Rejuvant analysis followed 42 customers for 4–10 months, averaging seven. Its timed-release 1 g/day Ca-AKG-plus-vitamin formula had no placebo comparison. An average eight-year saliva-clock drop does not establish eight extra healthy years. Official context
- Newer evidence still separates association from proof. A 2026 cohort associated branded delayed-release AKG plus vitamins with a 1.8-year lower age residual, meaning younger than predicted by its model. Regular AKG's association was smaller and nonsignificant; self-reported dAKG use did not show a significant longitudinal improvement. This was observational, not a formulation trial. Official context
- Trial designs and medical doses are separate contexts. ABLE's protocol uses 1 g/day sustained-release Ca-AKG for six months plus three-month follow-up, without efficacy results. Its higher-dose dialysis/bone context and cited mouse findings cannot set a healthy person's course. Official context
