STUDboardsToken · Cards · Research · Play · Study · Self · Fit · Money · Learn · Motivation · Adventure · Skill · Biohack · Personalities · STUD=1 STUDtokenOptional
Made in America
May contain inaccuracies · Check reliable sources · Not medical or health advice
← All topicsSTUDself

Numbers · Lots of talk

Big bloodwork panels

Also called Function Health · Superpower · 100 biomarker panel · longevity bloodwork

Community talk. May contain inaccuracies. Not medical or health advice. No result or safety is promised.

Broad bloodwork memberships bundle many blood tests with a results dashboard and explanations. They offer initial and repeat testing; the results still need clinical context before deciding on treatment.

Function Health

01

What the membership actually buys

One panel covers several kinds of questions. Menus include cholesterol-related markers, glucose, thyroid hormones and nutrients. Some entries are calculated ratios rather than separate measurements. Compare the actual test list and repeat schedule alongside the advertised count.

Superpower · biomarker menu

Function Health lists $365 per year. Checked September 29, 2026: 160+ annual lab tests across two rounds, clinician review and an organized results record. NY/NJ have separate pricing arrangements; add-on tests and imaging cost extra.

Function Health · pricing

Superpower lists $349 per year. Checked September 29, 2026: 150+ annual biomarkers across two draws, a dashboard, a personalized plan, AI and care-team support. At-home draws cost extra; NY/NJ pricing may vary.

Superpower · membership

Function's second panel is smaller. Its FAQ describes 100+ initial tests and 60+ tests 3–6 months later at Quest, used before renewal. Preparation includes an eight-hour fast; do not stop medicines without consulting your doctor. Cycle timing can require two initial visits.

Function Health · FAQ

Superpower includes a 50+ marker retest. Its FAQ also lists on-demand care-team support, with concierge help for scheduling and connecting with the team. The membership complements primary care and does not provide emergency care.

Superpower · FAQ

Function's review is not ongoing treatment. Clinicians review results against the submitted history. Function is a technology platform using independent laboratory and medical providers; its explanations and food or supplement guides do not replace a treating clinician.

Function Health · how it works

02

Where a broad panel can be useful

Access to a specific test you wanted. Function includes ApoB, Lp(a), ferritin, A1c and thyroid tests. A bundle puts several results together; availability does not mean everyone needs each test or that every marker repeats twice yearly.

Function Health · test menu

A record that can travel to your doctor. Function allows downloading and sharing results and tracks changes over time. These features can make a clinician conversation more concrete when the results answer a relevant question.

Function Health · how it works

More screening is not a proven longevity benefit. A Cochrane review found little or no mortality benefit from general checks in adults not selected for specific diseases or risks. It studied neither these memberships nor symptom-directed testing, so it cannot settle either brand's value.

Cochrane · 2019

03

Before acting on a flagged result

A flag needs context. Healthy people can fall outside reference ranges; normal results can coexist with illness. Symptoms, history, medicines and preparation matter. Use the performing lab's range rather than diagnosing yourself from dashboard colors.

MedlinePlus · 2025

Follow-up can extend beyond the membership. Function charges separately for on-demand tests and imaging. Member chat does not offer medical advice; a PDF can go to your doctor, and a healthcare provider calls for critical results. Other findings may also need outside care.

Function Health · FAQ

A personalized plan is also a commercial offer. Superpower also offers member-priced diagnostics, supplements and prescriptions. Access does not make buying them necessary; distinguish the testing fee from additional purchases when judging value.

Superpower · FAQ

04

What people report after the blood draw

Why people buy testing and what they learn

A disappointing physical can prompt the search. People describe seeking more detail after feeling dismissed, then finding a service through a podcast ad or a friend's report. They compare appointment waits, home-collection logistics and extra fees as well as the test menu.

Community

A small shortlist makes the report manageable. People describe circling five to eight priorities: ApoB, ferritin, A1c or glucose, TSH, vitamin D or sex hormones. Some arrange human review that week instead of chasing every colored line. This is reported practice, not a prescribed test list.

Community

A useful baseline can lead to narrower follow-up. One Function user reported deficiencies after years of symptoms, using the standard panel plus a paid nutrient add-on. They described improvement after self-treatment, then switched to cheaper individual retests. The account cannot verify diagnoses or establish safe treatment.

Community · Reddit · r/Function_Health

Good results do not always mean good explanations. One Function user liked receiving results but still had questions after using AI; another found the explanation generic. A third reported motivating mid-year changes with a nutritionist, while their doctor dismissed most flags as unimportant.

Community · Reddit · r/Function_Health

Draws, result timing and renewal

The interface and result timing affect satisfaction. One user preferred Superpower's interface but later chose Function to combine labs with scans. Another Superpower user reported results visible in MyQuest for days before reaching the service and an unanswered support message.

Community · Reddit · r/superpowerhealth

An easy draw can coexist with purchase fatigue. A Superpower user described an almost painless eight-tube Quest draw and planned targeted retesting. They disliked clicking through many add-on offers and said their doctor considered the panel excessive. Their past price does not establish today's offer.

Community · Reddit · r/Function_Health

Renewal depends on what changed after the first report. People describe canceling after repetitive results, muting notifications or switching to targeted Ulta, Quest or Labcorp tests. Others keep convenient booking or shared use with friends. Reported intervals include 6–12 months; medical follow-up can have a different timetable.

Community

Flags and repeated reassurance

Waiting and flags can change how testing feels. People describe refreshing results, losing sleep over flags, then relief after human review. Some immediately buy supplements or order another brand to check the first. Others find a normal report reassuring but see little change in daily life.

Community

More testing can feed the need for reassurance. One commenter said unnecessary testing increased their need for tests to feel safe. Another relayed a physician partner's worry about obsessing over benign findings. These accounts do not show that all users become anxious.

Community · Reddit · r/HealthAnxiety

References for this topic

Sources and context

  1. Function Health Membership ↗

    id
    self-guide-panels-function-membership — Function Health Membership
    platform
    Function Health
    role
    Service rules
    accessed On
    2026-09-24
    locator
    Membership price, testing cadence, Quest locations, and Heart biomarker list
    scope
    The page lists 365 dollars a year, 160 or more lab tests, an annual draw plus a mid-year draw 3 to 6 months later, Quest testing at more than 2,000 sites, and ApoB plus Lp(a) on the heart list. A member MRI is listed at 899 dollars.
    limitations
    Marketing claims about detecting disease and about a 26-test checkup are the company's comparisons. The page does not establish which flags need treatment.
    slugs
    • function-superpower

  2. Superpower health membership ↗

    id
    self-guide-panels-superpower-home — Superpower health membership
    platform
    Superpower
    role
    Service rules
    accessed On
    2026-09-24
    locator
    Homepage membership block and FAQ on what is included
    scope
    The homepage offers 349 dollars a year for 150 or more biomarkers across two draws, about a 10-minute draw at Quest or at home for an extra fee, and results in about a week. New York and New Jersey pricing may vary.
    limitations
    The homepage does not itemize ApoB. A separate Superpower page opened the same day conflicts on draw count and biomarker count. The member survey of 143 people is not an independent trial.
    slugs
    • function-superpower

  3. 2026 ACC/AHA Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia ↗

    id
    self-guide-apob-jacc-2026 — 2026 ACC/AHA Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Dyslipidemia
    platform
    JACC
    role
    Official context
    accessed On
    2026-09-24
    locator
    Section 3.3 Measurement of ApoB, and the calcium-score paragraph that pairs apoB under 100 mg/dL with an LDL-C goal; published March 13, 2026
    scope
    ApoB is one molecule per LDL, VLDL, and Lp(a) particle; measurement is reasonable in named higher-risk groups after LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals; fasting status does not affect apoB; supplements are not recommended to lower LDL-C or triglycerides.
    limitations
    The retrieved text does not list a separate apoB goal for every risk tier. The under-100 mg/dL apoB figure appears in a specific calcium-score setting.
    slugs
    • apob
    • function-superpower

  4. How Function Health works ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-function-process — How Function Health works
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Function Health
    locator
    Steps 1–4 and platform/provider footer.
    scope
    Process, sharing and care boundary.
    limitations
    Maker description; clinical outcomes unverified.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  5. What we test — Superpower ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-superpower-menu — What we test — Superpower
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Superpower
    locator
    Baseline filter, system headings and Derived Biomarker entries.
    scope
    Menu structure and calculated entries.
    limitations
    Duplicated categories; no independently counted total.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  6. Function Health pricing ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-function-pricing — Function Health pricing
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Function Health
    locator
    Membership block and pricing footer.
    scope
    Price and inclusions.
    limitations
    Checkout and jurisdiction may differ.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  7. Superpower health membership ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-superpower-home — Superpower health membership
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Superpower
    locator
    Current membership block and pricing footnotes.
    scope
    Current advertised offer.
    limitations
    Marketing; older indexed offers differ.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  8. Function Health FAQs ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-function-faq — Function Health FAQs
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Function Health
    locator
    Scheduling, preparation, results and membership questions.
    scope
    Cadence, preparation and follow-up.
    limitations
    General instructions; follow personal appointment directions.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  9. Superpower membership FAQs ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-superpower-faq — Superpower membership FAQs
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Superpower
    locator
    Membership, Concierge and Marketplace.
    scope
    Retest, support and paid products.
    limitations
    Service description, not independent evaluation.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  10. What Function Health tests ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-function-menu — What Function Health tests
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Service rules
    platform
    Function Health
    locator
    Heart, thyroid, nutrients, metabolic sections; 2x legend.
    scope
    Named included tests.
    limitations
    Menu is not screening guidance.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  11. General health checks for reducing illness and mortality ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-cochrane-checks — General health checks for reducing illness and mortality
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Professional context
    platform
    Cochrane
    locator
    Plain-language results and selection criteria.
    scope
    Evidence boundary for broad screening.
    limitations
    Search through January 2018; neither current brand studied.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29
    published On
    2019-01-30

  12. How to Understand Your Lab Results ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-medline-results — How to Understand Your Lab Results
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Professional context
    platform
    MedlinePlus / National Library of Medicine
    locator
    Reference ranges; factors affecting results.
    scope
    Interpretation limits.
    limitations
    General education, not personal interpretation.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29
    updated On
    2025-09-04

  13. Looking for advice on real experiences with blood testing ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-reddit-followup — Looking for advice on real experiences with blood testing
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Community discussion
    platform
    Reddit · r/Function_Health
    locator
    bregle and Zero_Cool2023 comments and surrounding replies.
    scope
    Reported benefit, targeted retesting, draw experience and upselling.
    limitations
    Self-selected anecdotes; diagnoses, treatment effects and prior prices unverified. Rendered timestamps relative only.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  14. Physicians looking to learn more about Function users ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-reddit-interpretation — Physicians looking to learn more about Function users
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Community discussion
    platform
    Reddit · r/Function_Health
    locator
    alibam44, Ill-Illustrator-4049 and the clinical-report/nutritionist comment, with replies.
    scope
    Mixed experiences with interpretation and retest motivation.
    limitations
    Recruitment thread with self-described physicians; anecdotes not a representative sample. Relative timestamps only; comments may describe earlier service features.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  15. Are you all happy with Superpower? ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-reddit-superpower — Are you all happy with Superpower?
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Community discussion
    platform
    Reddit · r/superpowerhealth
    locator
    Taupe88 and internalogic comments; internalogic's A1c correction retained in review.
    scope
    Interface preference and result/support delays.
    limitations
    Individual reports; no verified service-wide delay rate. Corrected A1c allegation and AI-written legal analysis are excluded. Relative timestamps only.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

  16. Considering services like Function or Superpower for labs! ↗

    id
    self22b8-function-superpower-reddit-anxiety — Considering services like Function or Superpower for labs!
    slugs
    • function-superpower
    role
    Community discussion
    platform
    Reddit · r/HealthAnxiety
    locator
    ArmWarm8743 and fauxrealistic comments.
    scope
    Testing-related reassurance cycle and worry.
    limitations
    One general testing account and one secondhand physician-partner opinion; not measured brand-specific harm. Relative timestamps only.
    accessed On
    2026-09-29

Keep this topic in view

Preserved original record

Earlier public profile and reader notes are preserved separately from the current article. They may contain superseded wording and are not newly checked material.

Read the full original profile
slug
function-superpower
name
Big bloodwork panels
aliases
  • Function Health
  • Superpower
  • 100 biomarker panel
  • longevity bloodwork
family
numbers
heat
high
talk
Lots of talk
most Discussed
false
first Line
Function, Superpower and similar services sell broad packages of blood tests with reports covering many markers.
why Line
The attraction is receiving a broad set of lab results in one organized place. The harder part is deciding which findings matter, what follow-up costs and whether more numbers make the next decision clearer.
feel Words
  • function health
  • superpower
  • bloodwork
  • 100 biomarkers
  • lab panel
common Picture
  • lead
    Named examples
    why
    Function and Superpower are examples of broad-panel services discussed in these notes. [community]
  • lead
    Reported repeat schedule
    why
    Yearly or twice-yearly panels appear in accounts, with separately arranged follow-up testing when needed. [community]
  • lead
    Common markers discussed
    why
    ApoB, ferritin, A1c, thyroid markers and vitamins receive more discussion than many other items in the package. [community]
watch For
A long PDF is a starting point. Bring it to someone who can interpret it.
what People Say
  • The job: A wider blood draw than a routine physical when people felt dismissed. [community]
  • Why it’s loud: Function’s 2025 funding wave and Superpower rivalry live on r/Function_Health and X. [community]
  • What you get: a long PDF. What you still need: a clinician. [community]
  • Ulta / Quest / Labcorp add-ons are the unglamorous cousins. [community]
  • Compare services separately from medical decisions: a larger test package does not by itself establish which findings need treatment. [community]
how People Run It
  • Circle 5–8 markers they already care about before the email arrives. [community]
  • Book the follow-up the same week. [community]
  • Don’t order a second brand to “compare truth.” [community]
  • If something is flagged, they treat it like a lab, not a personality. [community]
amounts People Use
  • Cost talk: often hundreds of USD per draw. [community]
  • Marker counts: 100+ on ads; people use a handful. [community]
  • Repeat: 6–12 months unless a clinician said sooner. [community]
how People Keep It
  • Small version: one panel, one reader. [community]
  • First week: don’t buy a stack off the PDF. [community]
  • They track: the circled markers. [community]
  • It fades when: the PDF becomes a shopping list. [community]
how It Feels
  • Waiting for results: over-research. [community]
  • A clean PDF: relief, then they have to live. [community]
  • A wall of yellow flags: panic unless a person translates. [community]
how Long People Run It
  • A yearly or twice-yearly object, not a weekly score. [community]
deep Dive
  • How the megapanel week actually unfolds in public rooms: Someone hears a Function or Superpower ad on a podcast, screenshots a friend’s hundred-marker PDF, or lands on r/Function_Health after a “normal” physical that never measured ApoB. They book a draw, wait for the kit or the phlebotomy slot, and then live in email for a few days while refreshing tracking pages. When the report lands it is longer than any annual physical they remember, color bands and summary scores and all. The first hour is usually not calm reading — it is tab-hopping between reference ranges, Discord screenshots, and whichever AI summary the app shoved above the fold. People who keep their heads circle five to eight markers they already cared about before the cart opened — ApoB, ferritin, A1c or fasting glucose, TSH, sometimes vitamin D or a sex-hormone block — and treat the rest as background noise until a human who can order follow-up looks at the slip without panic. That is the week forums describe over and over. [community]
  • What “my physical was normal” really means in this conversation: Many standard US annual panels still skip ApoB and Lp(a), which is why Attia-shaped listeners and Dayspring-adjacent clips keep getting repeated when someone is angry that everything looked fine while particle count or genetic risk was never asked. A consumer megapanel can close that gap in one draw, or it can bury the one useful number under eighty extras with “optimal” marketing bands that do not match a clinician’s ranges or guidelines people later find. Forums compare Function wait times, Superpower ads, Ulta and Quest add-ons, and Labcorp self-order menus more like product reviews than like medicine, complete with promo codes and phlebotomy horror stories. The scientific reason people bother is discordance talk — LDL-C can look okay while ApoB is not — not a brand war between logos. Once the chosen tests are drawn, the useful next step is interpretation with a clinician who can connect the results to symptoms, history and a plan. [community]
  • Money, membership, and the anxiety product: Accounts on X and Reddit discuss a few hundred dollars per testing cycle, depending on promotions, membership tier and whether the blood draw is included, and compare phlebotomy wait times, at-home kit logistics and extra fees. People who quit often say the same sentence in different words: the PDF became a shopping list rather than a plan. They ordered a second brand “to compare truth,” bought supplements off yellow flags the same night, or redrew monthly because a number moved a few points inside noise. The keepers book a follow-up the same week the email arrives, ask about the handful of markers that matter for their history, and put the full report away for months without living inside the app. Repeating the whole circus on a short clock is how the product shifts from information to a paid anxiety subscription with nicer graphics. After a medicine change or a large weight shift, a clinician may want a sooner redraw; otherwise the adult clock people describe is six to twelve months, not a weekly hobby or a personality. [community]
  • How the first two weeks after the PDF feel: Waiting for results is pure over-research, late-night abstract reading, and group-chat speculation that solves nothing. A clean report feels like relief for about a day, then life is still sleep and food and lifting and the same commute. A wall of yellow and orange flags feels like a diagnosis even when it is mostly “slightly outside a marketing band” that a clinician later shrugs at. People report sleeping worse the night they open a scary summary, then better once a human translates or dismisses half of it without selling a stack. The useful emotional arc in forums is not “I fixed my health in an app” — it is “I finally have ApoB on paper and a plan for the next year that a person signed off on.” Panic-shopping ferritin, thyroid, and testosterone stacks before a visit is the failure mode people mock in later comments when the cart receipt still stings. The boring success is one draw, five circled numbers, one conversation, then they go train. [community]
  • Soft voices and what they actually leave behind: Function's 2025 funding coverage, its own content, Superpower ads, Attia membership clips, and r/PeterAttia “just get the labs” threads are the soft voices people name when they explain why they spent the money. They leave behind the ask — draw ApoB, do not trust LDL-C alone, get a real follow-up — more than they leave durable brand loyalty once the novelty fades. Skeptics on the same platforms say consumer panels are expensive anxiety machines and that a targeted Quest order plus a primary-care visit answers the same questions for less theater and less color psychology. Both poles show up in the same week of someone’s feed and both can sound right about different sentences. ApoB, ferritin and testosterone tests, biological-age estimates and full-body MRI answer different questions. A broad blood-test bundle does not make those measurements interchangeable; its usefulness depends on which questions are relevant and what follow-up occurs. [community]
  • Why some people stop or change testing: Earlier discussion accounts describe canceling a subscription when repeated results did not lead to useful follow-up or when little changed between blood draws. Others turn off notifications, stop sharing every flagged result, choose a short list of markers with a clinician, switch to individual tests or use a cheaper annual draw. Some keep a service because booking is convenient or friends use it. Cost, boredom and difficulty interpreting many “optimal” flags are different from a medical judgment that testing is unnecessary. A useful follow-up question is whether a result addresses a specific concern and informs an appropriate next step. [community]
  • Results need clinical context: A thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) value, app color band or AI summary does not by itself establish a diagnosis or justify starting a hormone. Reference ranges can differ, and an app's marketed “optimal” range is not itself a clinical target. A clinician can interpret the results and order an appropriate next step. Severe symptoms such as chest pain need appropriate urgent medical care rather than waiting for a routine result-review appointment; concerning laboratory results also require clinical follow-up. Atherogenic particles, iron status, glucose and thyroid function can be relevant when symptoms or history warrant testing. Consumer bundles are one access route alongside Ulta, Quest, Labcorp and an order from the person's clinician. The bundle's size matters less than whether the results answer a useful question and lead to appropriate follow-up. [community]
watch For Long
  • Not a diagnosis engine. [community]
  • Out-of-range panic + random supplements is the fail. [community]
related
  • apob
  • ferritin
  • testosterone-labs
  • biological-age
  • full-body-mri
  • dexa
research Pointer
    play Pointer
    —
    forums
    • r/Function_Health
    • r/Biohackers
    • r/Cholesterol
    sources
    • Function Nov 2025: $298M Series B at $2.5B
    • 2026 Reddit: Superpower cheaper, similar markers
    • Function v Superpower advertising suit 2026
    • r/Function_Health vendor-rivalry threads
    • 2025 Function funding coverage
    disclaimer
    Community talk may be wrong. Not medical or health advice. No result or safety is promised.
    quick Answer History
    • field
      commonPicture
      rows
      • lead
        Repeat on a months-to-year clock
        why
        Not a weekly hobby. [community]
    • field
      communityPicture
      rows
      • People describe wanting more detail than a routine physical provided, then working out which results matter to their situation. Cost, repeat testing and finding someone to interpret a long report are recurring parts of the existing notes.
    • field
      firstLine
      rows
      • People pay for a huge lab draw because the annual physical felt like nothing.
    • field
      whyLine
      rows
      • A large lab panel people order when a regular physical felt thin.
    • field
      commonPicture
      rows
      • lead
        One big panel, one PDF
        why
        Function, Superpower, and lookalikes. [community]
      • lead
        Hundreds of dollars
        why
        Price is part of the talk, not a shop rank. [community]
      • lead
        Then a human who can read it
        why
        The PDF is not the plan. [community]
      • lead
        A handful of markers they actually track
        why
        Not all 100+. [community]
      • lead
        Repeat talk: 6–12 months
        why
        The report describes a yearly or twice-yearly panel, with earlier testing when separately arranged. [community]
      • lead
        ApoB, ferritin, A1c, thyroid, vitamins as usual stars
        why
        The rest is noise until someone circles it. [community]
    • field
      whatPeopleSay
      rows
      • This page does not rank vendors as medicine. [community]
    • field
      deepDive
      rows
      • What “my physical was normal” really means in this conversation: Many standard US annual panels still skip ApoB and Lp(a), which is why Attia-shaped listeners and Dayspring-adjacent clips keep getting repeated when someone is angry that everything looked fine while particle count or genetic risk was never asked. A consumer megapanel can close that gap in one draw, or it can bury the one useful number under eighty extras with “optimal” marketing bands that do not match a clinician’s ranges or guidelines people later find. Forums compare Function wait times, Superpower ads, Ulta and Quest add-ons, and Labcorp self-order menus more like product reviews than like medicine, complete with promo codes and phlebotomy horror stories. The scientific reason people bother is discordance talk — LDL-C can look okay while ApoB is not — not a brand war between logos. This map does not crown a vendor; it maps the habit of finally drawing the markers people kept asking for and then sitting with one reader instead of thirty Reddit diagnoses and a shopping cart. [community]
      • Money, membership, and the anxiety product: Cost talk on X and Reddit clusters in the hundreds of dollars per draw, sometimes with membership framing, and the comparison shopping never really ends once someone is in the loop. People who quit often say the same sentence in different words: the PDF became a shopping list rather than a plan. They ordered a second brand “to compare truth,” bought supplements off yellow flags the same night, or redrew monthly because a number moved a few points inside noise. The keepers book a follow-up the same week the email arrives, ask about the handful of markers that matter for their history, and put the full report away for months without living inside the app. Repeating the whole circus on a short clock is how the product shifts from information to a paid anxiety subscription with nicer graphics. After a medicine change or a large weight shift, a clinician may want a sooner redraw; otherwise the adult clock people describe is six to twelve months, not a weekly hobby or a personality. [community]
      • Soft voices and what they actually leave behind: Function’s own content, Superpower ads, Attia membership clips, and r/PeterAttia “just get the labs” threads are the soft voices people name when they explain why they spent the money. They leave behind the ask — draw ApoB, do not trust LDL-C alone, get a real follow-up — more than they leave durable brand loyalty once the novelty fades. Skeptics on the same platforms say consumer panels are expensive anxiety machines and that a targeted Quest order plus a primary-care visit answers the same questions for less theater and less color psychology. Both poles show up in the same week of someone’s feed and both can sound right about different sentences. This card steals the map of what gets measured and how people behave after the email, not a merch ranking or an affiliate table. Sibling cards on this house — ApoB, ferritin, testosterone labs, biological-age clocks, full-body MRI — are different questions; the megapanel is the bundle and the habit of not becoming a patient of the internet overnight. [community]
      • What drops out when the honeymoon ends: Subscriptions cancel when the second PDF looks like the first and nobody changed behavior between the two draws in any way that would show. People drop the app notifications, stop screenshotting every flag into the group chat, and either keep a short list of markers with a clinician or they abandon the whole theater for a cheaper annual draw that still includes the few numbers they learned to care about. Some switch to à-la-carte markers only once they know which lines matter. Others keep the brand because their group chat all uses it and the logistics of booking are easy enough to justify. What rarely survives long is reading eighty lines of “optimal” every quarter with no plan and no human translator. The drop is not usually a medical conclusion — it is boredom, cost, or the realization that the gym and sleep were always going to move more of life than a prettier PDF with more yellow ink. [community]
      • Amounts and clocks people actually name: Marker counts in ads sit at one hundred plus; people report using a handful when they are honest about what changed decisions. Dollar talk is often a few hundred per cycle depending on promo, membership tier, and whether phlebotomy is included or a surprise. Phlebotomy wait times and at-home kit friction are compared as much as science in the vendor threads. Redraw intervals people describe without a clinician override cluster around half a year to a year once the first panic settles. First-week behavior after results is the risk window for supplement carts and second opinions that are really second anxieties. None of those numbers are a protocol from this house; they are the amounts that show up when people describe their receipts and calendars in public. If a flag needs urgent care language — chest pain, severe symptoms, extreme labs — that leaves the lifestyle map entirely and becomes a person and a clinician, not a deeper brand comparison thread. [community]
      • What this map refuses to do while still being useful: It will not rank Function against Superpower as medicine, interpret a personal TSH, start a hormone, or turn a color band into a diagnosis someone wears as identity. It will not treat an AI summary as a care plan or a substitute for a licensed reader who can order the next step. It will note that papers and guidelines people pass around still care about atherogenic particles, iron status, glucose, and thyroid when symptoms or history warrant looking — and that consumer bundles are one logistics path among Ulta, Quest, Labcorp, and a standard order from a clinician who already knows the patient. The discussion-map job is simple even when the PDF is long: show how the week goes, what people circle, what they buy when scared, what they drop when bored, and why the human reader is the product people eventually admit they needed after the app hype cooled. [community]
      • How a 100-marker week actually goes: They pick a vendor because a podcast or a friend did, they book a draw, and a week later a PDF lands in email with more yellow flags than a physical ever showed. The useful move is circling ApoB, ferritin, A1c or glucose, TSH, and maybe vitamin D or testosterone before opening the shopping tab. Function’s 2025 funding story and Superpower ads made the bundle a personality; r/Function_Health compares phlebotomy and wait times, not medical truth. Ulta, Quest, and Labcorp add-ons can ask the same five questions for less theater. A clinician who will look at the slip is the product; the app’s “optimal” band is marketing. Repeating the whole circus monthly is how people buy anxiety instead of a plan.
      • What “normal physical” missed: Many US annual panels still skip ApoB and Lp(a), which is why Attia-shaped listeners show up angry that everything was “normal.” A consumer megapanel can close that gap or bury the one number under eighty extras. Discordance between LDL-C and ApoB is the scientific reason the extra ask exists, not a brand war. If the PDF flags thirty things, they book one visit rather than thirty Reddit threads. This card will not rank Function against Superpower as medicine.
      • What changed in 2025–26: Function Health’s raise and Superpower’s consumer ads made “100+ markers at home” a personality. Reddit rooms compare wait times, phlebotomy, and whether the app’s AI summary scared them. The useful residue is not the brand — it is whether ApoB, ferritin, A1c, TSH, and a few others finally got drawn and read by a human. [community]
      • Why a physical felt thin: many US annual labs still skip ApoB and Lp(a). People who listen to Attia / Dayspring show up angry that “everything was normal” on a panel that never asked the question. A big consumer panel can close that gap — or dump 80 extra numbers with no plan. [community]
      • How to read a 15-page PDF without becoming a patient of the internet: circle the handful you came for, ignore the “optimal” color scale if it disagrees with your clinician, and book a visit before you open a cart. Reference ranges differ. “Optimal” on an app is a marketing band. [community]
      • Repeats and money: doing this monthly is how people buy anxiety. After a medicine or a big weight change, a clinician may want a sooner redraw. Otherwise a long interval is the adult clock. [community]
      • Siblings: ApoB, ferritin, testosterone labs, biological-age tests, Prenuvo-style MRI. Each is a different question. This card is the *bundle* and the *habit of not shopping the PDF.* [community]
      • Soft voices: Function’s own content, Superpower ads, Attia members, r/PeterAttia “just get the labs.” Steal the ask, not the merch. [community]
      • What this card will not do: pick a winner between vendors, interpret your TSH, or start a hormone. [community]
      • A boring success: one draw, five circled numbers, one conversation, then they go lift and sleep. [community]
    Read the preserved reader notes
    definition
    Function, Superpower and similar services sell broad packages of blood tests with reports covering many markers.
    community Picture
    The attraction is receiving a broad set of lab results in one organized place. The harder part is deciding which findings matter, what follow-up costs and whether more numbers make the next decision clearer.
    additions
      guide
      what
      • The moving part is a paid bundle of blood tests and a report, not a diagnosis. Function Health's membership page lists 160 or more lab tests a year, an annual draw plus a mid-year draw 3 to 6 months later, clinician review, and 365 dollars charged once a year. Draws are at more than 2,000 Quest sites with no extra site fee. At-home draws cost more. The heart list includes apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a). Function's line about a 26-test checkup is the company's claim, not a CDC count.
      • Superpower's homepage the same day offers 150 or more biomarkers across two draws for 349 dollars a year, results in about a week, at more than 2,000 Quest locations, with at-home draws extra. New York and New Jersey prices may vary, and the page does not print them. Another Superpower page says both two draws and, lower down, one draw of 100 or more biomarkers. It names ApoB in a comparison and does not itemize ApoB in the heart lines shown. A long report can include the 2026 guideline's lipid tests and many others. It is not that guideline.
      how
      • Before the report, write the few markers that would change a next step. For heart risk, the March 13, 2026 guideline's extras are apoB in the situations it names, and Lp(a) once. Function lists both. Confirm Superpower's requisition in the account, because its public pages disagree. Book the draw that company names. Function uses Quest or a paid home visit. Superpower's homepage describes a partner lab or a paid home visit of about 10 minutes.
      • Ask about food and drink. CDC's May 15, 2024 page says a cholesterol test may need 8 to 12 hours without food. The 2026 guideline says nonfasting blood is acceptable for most individuals, and apoB does not depend on a fast. The lab form is the instruction for that tube.
      • Read a flag as a lab flag. If a row is marked for follow-up, book a clinician that week. Function says its clinicians review results and that they can be shared with a doctor. Superpower's plan can include lifestyle, supplements, and access to prescriptions. That plan is not the prescriber who has the rest of the history. Do not buy a second brand to referee the first. Function includes the annual draw and the mid-year draw. Superpower's homepage includes a second draw for out-of-range markers. Its other page sells later retests. Read the checkout before counting on another tube.
      understand
      • More lines do not clarify the next decision. The 2026 guideline says advanced lipoprotein tests beyond a standard profile, non-HDL cholesterol, apoB, or Lp(a) usually do not change care, and extra numbers can overload the chart. Function markets early indicators of thousands of diseases. Superpower's homepage says early signs of more than 1,000 conditions. Those are product claims. Its member survey, 143 people at 90 days, is not a trial. Imaging costs extra. Function lists a member MRI at 899 dollars, up to 200 dollars off, outside the 365-dollar fee.
      • The miss is turning every flagged row into a supplement order. The guideline does not recommend supplements to lower LDL cholesterol or triglycerides. Out-of-range results go to a clinician, especially with chest symptoms or early family heart disease. Prices and menus change. These figures are what the pages showed on September 24, 2026, and Superpower's pages did not match. Community notes cover the scramble when many rows light up. The careful pass is a short list before the draw, one lab, and a person who can say which flags matter.
      sources
      Download original public profileDownload complete article

      End of Big bloodwork panels