Jump to a verse
2 Peter 2:4–10, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
2 Peter 2:4–10
Judgment Examples Lead to Rescue and Reservation
Rescue and reservation in the same sentence
If God did not spare sinning angels, or the ancient world, or Sodom and Gomorrah, and if he preserved Noah and rescued Lot, then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trial and to keep the unjust for judgment — especially those who go after defiling desire and despise lordship. Delayed justice is not absent justice. Destruction is not the only word; Noah and Lot sit in the middle of the chain.
The angel verse does not supply a complete map of hell, fallen-angel chronology, demons, or modern supernatural events. The flood is not a science textbook. Sodom must not be reduced to a slogan against LGBTQ people or detached from sexual violence, arrogance, and neglect of the vulnerable. Calling Lot righteous does not baptize every choice in Genesis. Rescue does not mean stay in abuse. Contempt for lordship does not require silence before an abusive leader.
How this should shape us
If you are being worn down by a room that calls cruelty honesty, hear rescue first: God is not confused about who is hunting whom. If you are tempted to play judge of a whole city, this unit is not your warrant. Help people leave danger, use lawful process, and refuse to turn these old stories into hatred of a present minority.
Teach it back
Explain 2 Peter 2:4–10 in your own words. Include its place in 2 Peter's movement, the unit's logic, one material uncertainty, and one use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Questions include the angel tradition's precise background, chains versus pits, the scope and manner of rescue, Lot's rhetorical characterization, and the referent of lordship and glories. The unit's conclusion is much clearer than those details: God knows rescue and judgment.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
2 Peter 2:4–10, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Greek wording, clause relationships, repeated terms, and the base text used for original-language discussion.
SBLGNT official text file 2Pet.txt, 2:4–10
Supports: Verse-level Greek, syntax, KJV-era wording, textual variants, and interpretive alternatives.
NET Bible 2 Peter PDF, 2:4–10 translation and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Supports: Pro-Petrine authorship case, literary flow, Greek observations, theological synthesis, and verse-level interpretation.
Harmon and Sloat, 2 Peter, section 2:4–10, with Author and Recipients, Theology, Purpose, outline, bibliography, and endnotes
Supports: The limited inspected record supports only the argument that 2 Peter 2:1–3:3 freely paraphrases and thoroughly reworks Jude 4–18.
Callan, Biblica 85.1 (2004), official abstract for pp. 42–64 and publicly visible opening at p. 42
Supports: The limited inspected abstract maps the angels–flood–Sodom sequence, Balaam expansion, dependence proposal, and proposed warning function.
Devivo dissertation repository record (2014), complete abstract paragraphs describing Jude 5–11 // 2 Peter 2:4–16
Supports: The limited inspected extract supports restraint about reconstructing the teachers because the polemic attacks wickedness and destruction without directly refuting a fully stated teaching.
Smith, 'Peter, Pseudepigraphy, and Polemics,' JSTOR official chapter metadata pp. 627–646 and publicly visible opening extract
Supports: Independent morphology, form, and lexical-range cross-check for material Greek claims.
STEP Bible Data repository, Greek morphology and lexical records for 2 Peter 2:4–10
Supports: Historical-critical orientation, genre, authorship and date alternatives, audience limits, whole-letter movement, and theological themes.
Enter the Bible 2 Peter course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, and Theological Themes; applied to 2 Peter 2:4–10
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: 2 Peter 2:4–10, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗Greek textual evidence
The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition
Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos
Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010
Supports: Greek wording, clause relationships, repeated terms, and the base text used for original-language discussion.
Exact location: SBLGNT official text file 2Pet.txt, 2:4–10
Open the 2 Peter Greek text file ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — 2 Peter with translators' and textual notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition
Supports: Verse-level Greek, syntax, KJV-era wording, textual variants, and interpretive alternatives.
Exact location: NET Bible 2 Peter PDF, 2:4–10 translation and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Open the official NET 2 Peter PDF ↗modern open commentary
2 Peter
Matthew Harmon and John Sloat
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023
Supports: Pro-Petrine authorship case, literary flow, Greek observations, theological synthesis, and verse-level interpretation.
Exact location: Harmon and Sloat, 2 Peter, section 2:4–10, with Author and Recipients, Theology, Purpose, outline, bibliography, and endnotes
Open source ↗peer reviewed article abstract
Use of the Letter of Jude by the Second Letter of Peter
Terrance Callan
Biblica 85.1, 2004
Supports: The limited inspected record supports only the argument that 2 Peter 2:1–3:3 freely paraphrases and thoroughly reworks Jude 4–18.
Exact location: Callan, Biblica 85.1 (2004), official abstract for pp. 42–64 and publicly visible opening at p. 42
Open source ↗doctoral dissertation abstract
2 Peter 2:4–16: The Redaction of the Biblical and Intertestamental References Dependent on Jude 5–11 and Their Overall Significance for the Document
Jenny Devivo
Loyola University Chicago eCommons, 2014
Supports: The limited inspected abstract maps the angels–flood–Sodom sequence, Balaam expansion, dependence proposal, and proposed warning function.
Exact location: Devivo dissertation repository record (2014), complete abstract paragraphs describing Jude 5–11 // 2 Peter 2:4–16
Open source ↗peer reviewed book chapter extract
Peter, Pseudepigraphy, and Polemics: Deviance and ‘False Teachers’ in 2 Peter
Daniel A. Smith
Peeters Publishers, in Peter in the Early Church, 2021
Supports: The limited inspected extract supports restraint about reconstructing the teachers because the polemic attacks wickedness and destruction without directly refuting a fully stated teaching.
Exact location: Smith, 'Peter, Pseudepigraphy, and Polemics,' JSTOR official chapter metadata pp. 627–646 and publicly visible opening extract
Open source ↗Lexical and grammatical evidence
STEP Bible Data
Tyndale House Cambridge
Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026
Supports: Independent morphology, form, and lexical-range cross-check for material Greek claims.
Exact location: STEP Bible Data repository, Greek morphology and lexical records for 2 Peter 2:4–10
Open source ↗modern scholarly book introduction
2 Peter course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, and theological themes
David Stewart; revised by Matthew L. Skinner
Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2023 revision
Supports: Historical-critical orientation, genre, authorship and date alternatives, audience limits, whole-letter movement, and theological themes.
Exact location: Enter the Bible 2 Peter course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, and Theological Themes; applied to 2 Peter 2:4–10
Open source ↗