2 Samuel 16:5–14, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
2 Samuel 16:5–14
Shimei Curses while David Refuses Immediate Revenge
Shimei curses, stones, and names blood
At Bahurim Shimei son of Gera, of Saul's family, comes out cursing, casting stones at David and at the servants, with mighty men on both sides. He calls David a bloody man and a man of Belial: the LORD has returned upon you the blood of Saul's house; the kingdom is in Absalom's hand because you are a bloody man.
The speech is hostile political theology. It is accusation, not an already-proved verdict. Abishai asks to take off his head for cursing the king.
David forbids the killing and leaves providence as a 'maybe'
What have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah? Let him curse, because the LORD has said unto him, Curse David. Who then shall say, Why have you done so? My own son seeks my life; how much more this Benjamite? Let him curse; the LORD has bidden him. It may be that the LORD will look on my affliction and requite me good for his cursing this day.
Restraint of immediate revenge sits beside an uncertain reading of the curse. 'It may be' is not a certificate that every insult is God's voice. Shimei continues on the hillside, cursing, throwing stones and dust, until the party arrives weary and refreshes itself.
How this should shape us
Restrain lethal retaliation under verbal attack, protect people from stones and blows, and do not confuse a humble possibility with a certain divine verdict. Neither killing the accuser nor treating every curse as prophecy is required here.
Teach it back
Explain 2 Samuel 16:5–14 in your own words. Include its narrative movement, one source-supported detail, one material uncertainty, one person or cost power can obscure, and one use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Interpreters differ over source layers, chronology, historicity, characterization, textual readings, and whether the court story mainly legitimates, indicts, or holds David in sustained tension. The package states the received movement first and labels reconstructions.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
2 Samuel 16:5-14, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated verbs, names, syntax, and the base text behind translation and textual discussion.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/2Sam.xml, 16:5-14
Supports: Unit-bounded wording, older-English clarification, textual witnesses, syntax, names, numbers, and major historical or literary notes actually printed for these verses.
NET Bible 2 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 565–566, translation and all translator notes attached to 16:5-14
Supports: Current publisher-visible controls for textual plurality, historical and archaeological limits, David's reception, political power, sexual violence, trauma, and the relationship with Kings and Chronicles; abstract-only chapters carry only their exposed claims.
Oxford Handbook of King David (2026), Introduction pp. xxiii–xxvii; chapter 17 abstract, pp. 244–254; chapter 18 abstract, pp. 255–272; and chapter 39 abstract, pp. 592–602, as relevant to this unit
Supports: Only the survey's exposed conclusion that boundaries, unity, date, intention, and theme of the traditionally delineated narrative lack current consensus.
Knapp, 'The Succession Narrative in Twenty-first-century Research,' Currents in Biblical Research 19.3 (2021), pp. 211–234; official complete abstract, bibliography, and bibliographic record
Supports: The publisher-exposed literary proposal that pervasive irony and satire criticize David and call leadership toward reform; used as a visible alternative, not an uncontested genre label or a source of uninspected detailed claims.
Miller, A King and a Fool? (2019), chapter 6, 'Absalom's Revolt,' pp. 135–188; official JSTOR book description, complete table of contents, chapter bibliographic records, and exposed opening extracts
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: 2 Samuel 16:5-14, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: 2 Samuel
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated verbs, names, syntax, and the base text behind translation and textual discussion.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/2Sam.xml, 16:5-14
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: 2 Samuel with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Unit-bounded wording, older-English clarification, textual witnesses, syntax, names, numbers, and major historical or literary notes actually printed for these verses.
Exact location: NET Bible 2 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 565–566, translation and all translator notes attached to 16:5-14
Open source ↗modern scholarly handbook limited access
The Oxford Handbook of King David
Edited by Mahri Leonard-Fleckman and Christine Mitchell
Oxford University Press, 2026
Supports: Current publisher-visible controls for textual plurality, historical and archaeological limits, David's reception, political power, sexual violence, trauma, and the relationship with Kings and Chronicles; abstract-only chapters carry only their exposed claims.
Exact location: Oxford Handbook of King David (2026), Introduction pp. xxiii–xxvii; chapter 17 abstract, pp. 244–254; chapter 18 abstract, pp. 255–272; and chapter 39 abstract, pp. 592–602, as relevant to this unit
Open source ↗peer reviewed scholarly survey abstract
The Succession Narrative in Twenty-first-century Research
Andrew Knapp
Currents in Biblical Research 19(3), pp. 211-234, 2021
Supports: Only the survey's exposed conclusion that boundaries, unity, date, intention, and theme of the traditionally delineated narrative lack current consensus.
Exact location: Knapp, 'The Succession Narrative in Twenty-first-century Research,' Currents in Biblical Research 19.3 (2021), pp. 211–234; official complete abstract, bibliography, and bibliographic record
Open source ↗open access scholarly monograph limited inspection
A King and a Fool?: The Succession Narrative as a Satire
Virginia Miller
Brill, 2019
Supports: The publisher-exposed literary proposal that pervasive irony and satire criticize David and call leadership toward reform; used as a visible alternative, not an uncontested genre label or a source of uninspected detailed claims.
Exact location: Miller, A King and a Fool? (2019), chapter 6, 'Absalom's Revolt,' pp. 135–188; official JSTOR book description, complete table of contents, chapter bibliographic records, and exposed opening extracts
Open source ↗