Section 103 of 10524:10–142 Samuel
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try 2 Samuel 7:16, Second Samuel 7:16, or 2 Sam 7:16.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

2 Samuel 24:10–14, King James Version

2 Samuel 24:10–14

David Confesses and Chooses among Three Judgments

The heart smites after the count is finished

David's heart smites him after he has numbered the people. He says to the LORD, I have sinned greatly; take away the iniquity of thy servant; I have done very foolishly. Remorse follows a completed command. It does not unwalk the officers' nine months or uncount the sword-drawers.

Gad offers three judgments; David chooses the LORD's hand

Gad, David's seer, comes: shall seven years of famine come unto thee in thy land, or wilt thou flee three months before enemies, or shall there be three days' pestilence? Advise, and see what answer I shall return to him that sent me. The KJV and Masoretic tradition offer seven years of famine; the Greek tradition and 1 Chronicles offer three. The choice scene carries that numerical variant.

David is in a great strait: let us fall now into the hand of the LORD, for his mercies are great; let me not fall into the hand of man. He chooses divine mercy rather than human pursuit. The options still all fall on the land and the people, not only on the king who numbered them.

How this should shape us

Confession after the fact must not be mistaken for prevention. When a leader's choice will spend a population, say who will actually bleed, and do not treat 'I prefer God's mercy' as a way to keep ordinary people off the ledger.

Teach it back

Explain 2 Samuel 24:10–14 in your own words. Include its narrative movement, one source-supported detail, one material uncertainty, one person or cost power can obscure, and one use the context rules out.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters disagree?

Best judgment: Interpreters differ over source layers, chronology, historicity, characterization, textual readings, and whether the court story mainly legitimates, indicts, or holds David in sustained tension. The package states the received movement first and labels reconstructions.

How certain? probable
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.

2 Samuel 24:10-14, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: 2 Samuel

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated verbs, names, syntax, and the base text behind translation and textual discussion.

Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/2Sam.xml, 24:10-14

NET Bible: 2 Samuel with translators' notes

Supports: Unit-bounded wording, older-English clarification, textual witnesses, syntax, names, numbers, and major historical or literary notes actually printed for these verses.

NET Bible 2 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 582–583, translation and all translator notes attached to 24:10-14

The Oxford Handbook of King David

Supports: Current publisher-visible controls for textual plurality, historical and archaeological limits, David's reception, political power, sexual violence, trauma, and the relationship with Kings and Chronicles; abstract-only chapters carry only their exposed claims.

Oxford Handbook of King David (2026), official Introduction pp. xxiii–xxvii and chapter 3 abstract and bibliographic record, pp. 37–53

The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as a Historiographical Source

Supports: One early-composition and historiographical-optimism proposal, literary structure, source integration, ethical poetics, and the limits of treating the proposal as consensus.

Garsiel, Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 10, article 5 (2010), complete open-access article pp. 1–42, especially the introduction and sections on composition, comparative structure, literary poetics, and historiographical value

Writing, Interpolating and Editing: 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 as a Case Study

Supports: Only the exposed proposal that 2 Samuel 24:16 is an interpolation and that 1 Chronicles 21 and 4Q51 reflect later readjustment; the full argument was not inspected.

Rofé, 'Writing, Interpolating and Editing: 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 as a Case Study,' Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel 3.3 (2014), pp. 317–326; official publisher abstract and bibliographic record only

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.

Exact location: 2 Samuel 24:10-14, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open source ↗

hebrew text and morphology

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: 2 Samuel

Open Scriptures

Open Scriptures, release 2.2

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated verbs, names, syntax, and the base text behind translation and textual discussion.

Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/2Sam.xml, 24:10-14

Open source ↗

translation and translator notes

NET Bible: 2 Samuel with translators' notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2006

Supports: Unit-bounded wording, older-English clarification, textual witnesses, syntax, names, numbers, and major historical or literary notes actually printed for these verses.

Exact location: NET Bible 2 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 582–583, translation and all translator notes attached to 24:10-14

Open source ↗

modern scholarly handbook limited access

The Oxford Handbook of King David

Edited by Mahri Leonard-Fleckman and Christine Mitchell

Oxford University Press, 2026

Supports: Current publisher-visible controls for textual plurality, historical and archaeological limits, David's reception, political power, sexual violence, trauma, and the relationship with Kings and Chronicles; abstract-only chapters carry only their exposed claims.

Exact location: Oxford Handbook of King David (2026), official Introduction pp. xxiii–xxvii and chapter 3 abstract and bibliographic record, pp. 37–53

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open access scholarly article

The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as a Historiographical Source

Moshe Garsiel

Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 10, article 5, 2010; published online 2011

Supports: One early-composition and historiographical-optimism proposal, literary structure, source integration, ethical poetics, and the limits of treating the proposal as consensus.

Exact location: Garsiel, Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 10, article 5 (2010), complete open-access article pp. 1–42, especially the introduction and sections on composition, comparative structure, literary poetics, and historiographical value

Open source ↗

peer reviewed scholarly article abstract

Writing, Interpolating and Editing: 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 as a Case Study

Alexander Rofe

Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel 3(3), pp. 317-326, 2014

Supports: Only the exposed proposal that 2 Samuel 24:16 is an interpolation and that 1 Chronicles 21 and 4Q51 reflect later readjustment; the full argument was not inspected.

Exact location: Rofé, 'Writing, Interpolating and Editing: 2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 as a Case Study,' Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel 3.3 (2014), pp. 317–326; official publisher abstract and bibliographic record only

Open source ↗