Read the passage and its setting
Daniel 6:6-9, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Daniel 6:6-9
Flattery Produces an Irrevocable Law Trap
The Main Point
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Context That Shapes This Passage
How does this passage relate?
Daniel 6:6-9In “Flattery Produces an Irrevocable Law Trap,” the complete unit develops this passage-specific claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Why this relationship fits: The reviewed boundary states: 6:6-9 is one natural movement because officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den. The boundary changes after verse 9.
Where does this sit in the whole book?
Daniel as a whole6:1-5 completes “Daniel Is Distinguished and Rivals Find No Corruption”; the text now turns to “Flattery Produces an Irrevocable Law Trap.” This completes the present movement before the next larger development: Daniel continues his known prayer practice, and the conspirators use it to force the king's own decree against him.
Why this relationship fits: 6:6-9 is one natural movement because officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den. The boundary changes after verse 9. The unit's reviewed main point is: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Follow the Tales and Visions
See why this section appears here and how the author's movement leads to its meaning.
Why Is This Passage Here?
6:1-5 completes “Daniel Is Distinguished and Rivals Find No Corruption”; the text now turns to “Flattery Produces an Irrevocable Law Trap.” This completes the present movement before the next larger development: Daniel continues his known prayer practice, and the conspirators use it to force the king's own decree against him.
Follow the Movement
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Why This Interpretation Fits
No fault found
The narrator praises Daniel's reliability in office, not ethnic superiority.
All presidents
Daniel is not part of the petition, so the officials' claim of unanimity is false.
Law trap
The king's desire for honor and the alleged immutability of law combine to defeat justice.
Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries
Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.
What the Passage Is Not Saying
Reading Daniel 6:6-9 inside Daniel's complete literary and historical movement rules out these uses:
Daniel's excellence does not make Judeans or Jews naturally superior administrators.
The plot does not make every workplace criticism religious persecution.
Irrevocable law is not a model for refusing to correct unjust policy.
The conspirators do not represent an ethnicity or modern civil servants as a group.
Context check: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
What Remains True Today
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Respond and Remember
Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.
How This Should Shape Us
Why these applications follow
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
How should this shape us today?
Require conflict-of-interest disclosure, truthful signatories, appeal, and a path to correct unjust rules. In Daniel 6:6-9, respond specifically to this movement: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Teach It Back
Explain Daniel 6:6-9 in your own words. Include its movement, ancient horizon, one material uncertainty, and one use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go Deeper
The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.
Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
No fault found
The narrator praises Daniel's reliability in office, not ethnic superiority.
All presidents
Daniel is not part of the petition, so the officials' claim of unanimity is false.
Law trap
The king's desire for honor and the alleged immutability of law combine to defeat justice.
Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps
excellent spirit
The phrase describes Daniel's extraordinary disposition or capacity without making him superhuman.
How certain? probablefaithful / trustworthy
His administrative reliability leaves opponents without a legitimate charge.
How certain? probableinterdict
The temporary ban concerns petitions to any god or person besides the king, not all ordinary speech.
How certain? probableWhat the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture
Imperial setting and limits of reconstruction
The administrative numbers and irrevocable Medo-Persian law are literary features with historical problems. They resemble Esther's law trap more than a recoverable constitutional rule.
How certain? probableWhy translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices
KJV wording and material Hebrew-Aramaic alternatives
KJV wording is retained from the pinned corpus; material Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek-edition differences are identified without replacing the displayed text.
How certain? probableEarlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas
Daniel in Jewish Scripture and ancient textual traditions
Read this unit inside Daniel's exilic court setting and scriptural world before importing later apocalyptic systems.
How certain? strongHow this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary
Later reception with first-horizon controls
Later Jewish and Christian reception may illuminate the unit, but it does not erase its ancient Judean horizon or settle disputed symbols.
How certain? probableTextual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning
Masoretic, Old Greek, Theodotion, and composition care
The Masoretic Hebrew-Aramaic text controls the pinned KJV coverage, while Old Greek and Theodotion remain material witnesses whose agreements and differences require passage-specific care.
How certain? probableWhere careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: The number of satraps, Daniel's office, exact petition ban, and legal immutability are debated. The narrative's critique of jealous administration and manipulated law is clear.
How certain? probableTheology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section
Theological contribution
The unit places human power under divine judgment and care without licensing readers to claim Daniel's revelatory authority for themselves.
How certain? strongTheological contribution
This unit contributes to Daniel's movement from exile and court service through beastly empire, suffering, judgment, resurrection hope, and promised rest: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
How certain? strongCommon ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading
Daniel's excellence does not make Judeans or Jews naturally superior administrators.
Daniel's memorable stories, numbers, and symbols can feel easier to imitate or decode than to interpret within their literary, historical, and ethical setting.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
The plot does not make every workplace criticism religious persecution.
Daniel's memorable stories, numbers, and symbols can feel easier to imitate or decode than to interpret within their literary, historical, and ethical setting.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Irrevocable law is not a model for refusing to correct unjust policy.
Daniel's memorable stories, numbers, and symbols can feel easier to imitate or decode than to interpret within their literary, historical, and ethical setting.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
The conspirators do not represent an ethnicity or modern civil servants as a group.
Daniel's memorable stories, numbers, and symbols can feel easier to imitate or decode than to interpret within their literary, historical, and ethical setting.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
A law becomes corrupt when officials design it around one person's conscience and a leader prizes flattery over review. Daniel 6:6-9 keeps that truth tied to this claim: Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Officials falsely claim unanimity and flatter the king into a thirty-day petition ban backed by the lions' den.
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Daniel 6:6-9, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew-Aramaic wording, morphology, language boundary, names, repeated roots, clauses, and lexical controls.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Dan.xml, 6:6-9; Hebrew 1:1–2:4a and 8:1–12:13, Aramaic 2:4b–7:28
Supports: Verse-level Hebrew-Aramaic, textual, historical, translation, chronology, angelic-language, and duration notes.
NET Bible Daniel PDF, printed pp. 1655–1657, translation and translator notes on 6:6-9
Supports: Bilingual form, genres, composition, imperial settings, Antiochus IV, four kingdoms, seventy weeks, resurrection, and major critical alternatives.
P. R. Davies, 'Daniel,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 563–571; chapter-level discussion applied to 6:6-9
Supports: Masoretic, Old Greek, and Theodotion comparison; philology; court-tale and Daniel 7 textual stages; and formation arguments.
Suchard, Aramaic Daniel, pp. 84–95; textual reconstruction and formation discussion applied to 6:6-9
Supports: Two major Greek editions, substantial chapters 4–6 differences, numbering, wording, order, and additions outside the pinned KJV mapping.
McLay, NETS Daniel, introduction printed pp. 991–994 and parallel Old Greek/Theodotion translation pp. 995–1025; 6:6-9
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: Daniel 6:6-9, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew aramaic text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Daniel
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew-Aramaic wording, morphology, language boundary, names, repeated roots, clauses, and lexical controls.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Dan.xml, 6:6-9; Hebrew 1:1–2:4a and 8:1–12:13, Aramaic 2:4b–7:28
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Daniel with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level Hebrew-Aramaic, textual, historical, translation, chronology, angelic-language, and duration notes.
Exact location: NET Bible Daniel PDF, printed pp. 1655–1657, translation and translator notes on 6:6-9
Open source ↗scholarly commentary article
Daniel
Philip R. Davies
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, edited by John Barton and John Muddiman, 2001
Supports: Bilingual form, genres, composition, imperial settings, Antiochus IV, four kingdoms, seventy weeks, resurrection, and major critical alternatives.
Exact location: P. R. Davies, 'Daniel,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 563–571; chapter-level discussion applied to 6:6-9
Open source ↗open access scholarly monograph
Aramaic Daniel: A Textual Reconstruction of Chapters 1-7
Benjamin D. Suchard
Brill, Studia Semitica Neerlandica 73, 2022
Supports: Masoretic, Old Greek, and Theodotion comparison; philology; court-tale and Daniel 7 textual stages; and formation arguments.
Exact location: Suchard, Aramaic Daniel, pp. 84–95; textual reconstruction and formation discussion applied to 6:6-9
Open source ↗greek text translation and introduction
A New English Translation of the Septuagint: Daniel
R. Timothy McLay
Oxford University Press for the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies, 2009, electronic corrections through 2014
Supports: Two major Greek editions, substantial chapters 4–6 differences, numbering, wording, order, and additions outside the pinned KJV mapping.
Exact location: McLay, NETS Daniel, introduction printed pp. 991–994 and parallel Old Greek/Theodotion translation pp. 995–1025; 6:6-9
Open source ↗