Section 1 of 1041:1–2:3Genesis

Go to another section

Jump to a verse

Jump to a verseOpen a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Genesis 12:3, Gen 12:3, or Ge 12:3.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

BookChapterVerse

King James VersionGenesis 1:1–2:3

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.

And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.

And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.

And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.

And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.

And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

And the evening and the morning were the third day.

And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,

And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.

And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.

And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.

And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.

And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.

And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Scripture text: King James Version, Standardized 1769 text. Public domain in the United States.About this Bible text

Genesis 1:1–2:3

God Orders, Fills, and Blesses Creation

God brings the heavens and earth from an unformed and unfilled condition into an ordered, inhabited, and very good world. Humanity—female and male—is made in God's image and blessed for shared, life-giving rule, while the completed movement reaches its goal in God's blessed and holy seventh-day rest.

Why this sits here

Genesis begins here so every later family, land, creature, blessing, failure, and promise is understood inside God's good creation. The section gives readers the controlling starting point: creation belongs to God, every human bears the divine image, human rule is delegated rather than absolute, and completed work moves toward blessed rest.

The narrator describes no human observer or conversation partner. The section proceeds through highly patterned divine commands, fulfillments, namings, separations, blessings, evaluations, and day refrains until creation is complete and God rests.

How the passage moves

The opening identifies God as creator and depicts the earth as unformed, unfilled, dark, and watery, with God's wind or Spirit over the waters (1:1–2).
God creates light, separates it from darkness, names day and night, and marks day one (1:3–5).
God separates waters with the expanse and names it heaven, completing the second day (1:6–8).
God gathers the lower waters, exposes and names dry land, and brings forth seed-bearing vegetation, completing the third day (1:9–13).
God appoints the heavenly lights to govern day and night and to mark signs, seasons, days, and years, completing the fourth day (1:14–19).
God fills waters and sky with living creatures, blesses them for fruitfulness, and completes the fifth day (1:20–23).
God brings forth land animals and evaluates them as good (1:24–25).
God creates humankind in the divine image—female and male—and blesses them for fruitfulness and responsible rule within the living world (1:26–30).
God evaluates the whole completed creation as very good, and the sixth day closes (1:31).
The heavens, earth, and their host are finished; God ceases from the work, blesses the seventh day, and sets it apart as holy (2:1–3).

What the author is communicating

The received passage presents one sovereign God ordering and filling the entire world through effective speech. Creation is purposeful and good, living creatures are blessed, every human shares the divine image and a delegated vocation, and completed work culminates in blessed holy rest. The text's central claims remain clear even where its syntax, ancient cosmology, composition, and chronology are disputed.

Why this reading fits

Evidence 1

The repeated sequence—God speaks, the command takes effect, God evaluates or names, and a day closes—makes divine speech and ordered purpose more prominent than any struggle among gods.

Evidence 2

The first three days chiefly establish ordered realms; the following three place governing lights and living creatures within corresponding realms. The correspondence is real even though interpreters disagree about how fully it determines the chronology.

Evidence 3

The sun and moon are called the greater and lesser lights rather than being named. Inside the narrative they are created objects assigned tasks; they are not rival deities.

Evidence 4

Humanity is introduced by deliberative divine speech and then described three times in relation to God's image. The poetic line explicitly includes female and male, and the following blessing gives the vocation to them together.

Evidence 5

The seventh day lacks the evening-morning closing used for the first six days. The text emphasizes completion, God's ceasing, blessing, and holiness; interpreters disagree about the further implications of the missing refrain.

A phrase that matters

Image / likeness

צֶלֶם / דְּמוּת · tselem / demut

The text grants this status to humankind and explicitly includes female and male. It does not reserve the divine image for kings, one sex, one ethnicity, or people with particular abilities.

Have dominion / subdue

רָדָה / כָּבַשׁ · radah / kabash

The vocabulary gives genuine human authority and responsibility; it does not make human rule ownerless, cruel, or free to destroy what belongs to God.

Rested / ceased

שָׁבַת · shabat

The section's climax is completed work and holy rest. Later Sabbath commands develop this pattern for Israel, but Genesis 2:1–3 first describes God's own completion, cessation, blessing, and sanctifying of the day.

A needed correction

Reading Genesis 1:1–2:3 as a complete section rules out these interpretations:

Genesis 1:1–2:3 does not provide a modern scientific mechanism or use modern scientific categories for the age and material development of the universe.

The passage does not teach that the sun, moon, stars, seas, animals, or human rulers are divine or worthy of worship.

The divine image does not belong only to male people, rulers, one ethnicity, unusually intelligent people, or people without disabilities.

Human dominion does not grant permission for cruel or careless destruction of creatures and places that the creator calls good.

The phrase 'Let us make' does not by itself give a complete later doctrine of the Trinity. Divine-council, deliberative-plural, and later Christian readings must be distinguished.

The opening verse does not, by its Hebrew syntax alone, settle every later philosophical question about creation from nothing, even though the wider biblical canon supports God as the ultimate source of all that exists.

The section does not permit readers to declare one Christian chronology view certain while ignoring the real calendar-day, day-age, framework, analogical, functional, and liturgical arguments.

What remains true

The world and every person belong to the creator. Human beings share God-given dignity and a delegated calling to foster ordered, fruitful life, and faithful work is not complete without receiving creaturely limits and holy rest.

How this should shape us

How should this shape us?

Treat every person as an image-bearer whose worth is not created by sex, ethnicity, ability, age, status, or usefulness.

How should this shape us?

Exercise authority as accountable stewardship: use power to cultivate and protect life rather than treating people, animals, and land as disposable possessions.

How should this shape us?

Let productive work and genuine rest both witness that human life is a gift under God, not a self-made system sustained by endless output.

How should this shape us?

Discuss creation-and-science disagreements honestly and humbly. Do not hide the text's ancient form, and do not make a disputed chronology the passage's entire message.

Teach it back

Explain Genesis 1:1–2:3 as one complete opening section. Show how the six work days move toward the seventh day, what the passage says about God and humanity, and one conclusion the context does not let you claim with certainty.

Explain the section in your own words

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement

Genesis 1:1–2:3

Evidence 1

The repeated sequence—God speaks, the command takes effect, God evaluates or names, and a day closes—makes divine speech and ordered purpose more prominent than any struggle among gods.

Genesis 1:1–2:3

Evidence 2

Genesis 1:1–2:3

Evidence 3

The sun and moon are called the greater and lesser lights rather than being named. Inside the narrative they are created objects assigned tasks; they are not rival deities.

Genesis 1:1–2:3

Evidence 4

Genesis 1:1–2:3

Evidence 5

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

In the beginning

The phrase can be read with Genesis 1:1 as an independent statement ('In the beginning God created') or as the beginning of a dependent temporal clause ('When God began to create').

How certain? probable

Created

This verb regularly has God as its subject in the Hebrew Bible. In this passage it names divine creative action without, by itself, specifying a physical process.

How certain? strong

Spirit of God / wind from God

Ruach can mean spirit, wind, or breath, and the Hebrew construction can be understood as God's Spirit or as a powerful/divine wind.

How certain? probable

Firmament

The KJV's 'firmament' reflects the expanse or vault that separates waters above from waters below in the account's ancient world-picture.

How certain? strong

Image / likeness

The paired terms describe humanity as representing God in the world. The passage immediately connects this identity with shared rule, while later interpretation proposes additional relational, moral, rational, and embodied dimensions.

How certain? strong

Have dominion / subdue

These are strong rule words. In this setting the authority is delegated by the creator, directed toward a world God repeatedly calls good, and joined to fruitfulness and provision.

How certain? strong

Rested / ceased

The verb means to stop or cease from work. It does not imply that God became exhausted.

How certain? strong

What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

What the first readers would have understood

Genesis shares features with other ancient Near Eastern creation traditions: a pre-ordered watery state, a structured cosmos, divine assignment of functions, heavenly lights, human vocation, and divine rest. The comparisons illuminate a shared ancient conceptual world without proving a single simple borrowing process.

How certain? probable

What the first readers would have understood

Genesis 1 differs in important ways from polytheistic conflict stories: one God commands without needing victory over a rival deity, lights and sea creatures are created rather than worshiped, the world is repeatedly called good, and all humanity receives image-bearing status.

How certain? strong

What the first readers would have understood

The passage uses an ancient world-picture rather than modern astrophysical vocabulary. Respecting that historical form lets readers hear its claims about God, order, goodness, vocation, and rest without forcing it to anticipate a modern textbook.

How certain? strong

Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

Why translations sometimes differ

The KJV's 'firmament' in 1:6–8 renders raqia. Modern versions variously use 'expanse,' 'vault,' or 'dome'; each choice makes a judgment about the account's ancient world-picture.

How certain? probable

Why translations sometimes differ

The KJV's 'moving upon' in 1:2 represents a verb often translated 'hovering.' The main uncertainty lies in ruach elohim: 'Spirit of God,' 'wind from God,' or 'mighty wind.'

How certain? probable

Why translations sometimes differ

The KJV's 'whales' in 1:21 is broader than the modern animal category. The Hebrew expression means the great sea creatures and does not identify one modern species.

How certain? strong

Why translations sometimes differ

The KJV's 'replenish the earth' in 1:28 uses older English for filling the earth; it does not imply that humans had previously filled it and must fill it again.

How certain? strong

Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Earlier Scripture and inherited background

Exodus 20:8–11 grounds Israel's work-and-Sabbath rhythm in God's six days of work and seventh-day rest; Exodus 31:12–17 makes the same pattern a covenant sign for Israel.

How certain? very strong

Earlier Scripture and inherited background

Psalm 8 reflects on humanity's honored place and delegated rule, while Psalm 104 retells creation through praise. These later texts develop Genesis's theology but do not remove the need to read Genesis 1 in its own literary setting.

How certain? strong

How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

How this connects with the rest of Scripture

John 1:1–5 and Colossians 1:15–17 identify the divine Word or Son with creation and sustaining life; 2 Corinthians 4:6 uses the creation of light to describe God's illuminating work.

How certain? very strong

How this connects with the rest of Scripture

New Testament new-creation language and Revelation's renewed creation develop the Bible's larger story. These later connections are canonical synthesis, not claims that the first audience already possessed every later formulation.

How certain? strong

Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

Textual variants

The Masoretic Hebrew reflected by the KJV says God completed the work 'on the seventh day.' The Samaritan Pentateuch, Septuagint, and some other ancient witnesses read 'on the sixth day,' probably clarifying that the work was finished before the seventh began. Either reading leaves the seventh day as the day of divine cessation and blessing.

How certain? probable

Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

How should Genesis 1:1–3 be construed?

Best judgment: The grammar is genuinely disputed. The section as a whole strongly identifies God as the sovereign creator and orderer; verse 1 alone should not be made to carry more precision than its syntax can securely bear.

How certain? probable

What kind of days and chronology does the section present?

Best judgment: The passage clearly gives a seven-day literary sequence and grounds work and holy rest. The exact relationship between that narrated week and material chronology remains disputed; STUDstudy will not convert one model into a test of faithfulness.

How certain? probable

How are Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 related?

Best judgment: The accounts are visibly distinct and deliberately adjacent in the received book. Readers can acknowledge likely compositional history while still asking how the final sequence develops creation and human vocation.

How certain? probable

Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

God alone is creator and sovereign speaker; creation is ordered, fruitful, inhabited, evaluated as good, and directed toward holy rest.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

Human dignity is universal in the scope of the passage, and human authority is derivative: image-bearing rule remains answerable to the creator and the goodness of creation.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

Later Christian creation through Christ and new-creation theology genuinely develop this opening but should be labeled as canonical synthesis rather than inserted as unstated original-language detail.

How certain? strong

Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

Genesis 1 does not function as a modern scientific report whose primary purpose is to give a technical mechanism or date for material origins.

Why it is attractive

Modern readers naturally bring modern origins questions to the opening of the Bible.

What context changes

The passage's repeated concerns are divine speech, order, naming, goodness, blessing, human vocation, completion, and rest.

A stronger reading

Assess chronology proposals openly, but begin with the claims the passage repeatedly makes on its own terms.

What truth can remain

God is the creator and creation is purposeful; humility about genre does not remove those claims.

The command to rule does not authorize exploitation, ecological carelessness, domination of vulnerable people, or unlimited human ownership.

Why it is attractive

The verbs for rule and subdue are strong and can be isolated from the creator's ownership and evaluation of creation as good.

What context changes

The authority is delegated by God to image-bearers within a blessed living world.

A stronger reading

Treat dominion as real but accountable rule that serves the flourishing of what belongs to God.

What truth can remain

The passage grants humanity meaningful authority and responsibility.

The phrase 'Let us make' does not by itself prove a complete doctrine of the Trinity to the first hearers.

Why it is attractive

Later Christian doctrine rightly speaks of Father, Son, and Spirit in creation, so readers may assume the plural directly names them here.

What context changes

The Hebrew plural admits several proposed explanations, while verse 27 returns to singular divine action.

A stronger reading

Preserve the original-language uncertainty, then explain later Christian creation theology as canonical development.

What truth can remain

The Christian canon locates creation in relation to the Father, Word or Son, and Spirit.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Reader-facing Scripture wording, verse numbering, paragraph data, and supplied-word markup.

Pinned eBible/CrossWire standardized 1769 KJV corpus, Genesis 1:1–2:3

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible — Genesis

Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, verse structure, and the repeated creation formulas.

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 1:1–2:3

NET Bible — Genesis with translators' notes

Supports: Material syntax, translation, textual-variant, firmament, image, rule, and seventh-day notes.

NET Bible, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 translator and study notes

Genesis

Supports: Final-form movement, creation theology, human vocation, and relationship to the rest of Genesis.

Genesis commentary, sections Genesis 1:1–2:3 and the book's creation overview

Genesis 1–2: Creation — Study Guide

Supports: Critical grammatical, historical, genre, image, and compositional questions.

Creation Study Guide, sections on Genesis 1:1 syntax, seven days, ancient cosmology, image of God, and the two creation accounts

Genesis 1:1–2:3 as a Prologue to the Book of Genesis

Supports: Genesis 1:1–2:3 as the book's prologue and the work, image, and Sabbath themes that orient Genesis.

Tyndale Bulletin 46.2, pp. 315–336

Genesis 1–2 in Its Literary Context

Supports: Literary relationship of Genesis 1–2 and the toledot-linked structure.

Tyndale Bulletin 41, pp. 143–153

Genesis' Two Creation Accounts Compiled and Interpreted as One

Supports: Evidence and limits of a distinct-sources and final-combination reading.

Sections 'The Two Creation Accounts' and 'The Redactional Interweaving of the Two Accounts'

Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology

Supports: Walton's ancient functional-order and cosmic-rest proposals used as one material modern interpretation.

Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology, chapters on ancient cosmology, functions, firmament, image, and divine rest

The Liturgy of Creation: Understanding Calendars in Old Testament Context

Supports: The liturgical-calendar reading and its disputed implications for chronology.

The Liturgy of Creation, creation-week and calendar-law thesis as documented by IVP and Themelios 45.3 review

Evangelical Interpretations of Genesis 1–2

Supports: Major evangelical chronology and genre alternatives.

Sections surveying calendar-day, gap, day-age, analogical-day, and framework interpretations

How Long Are the Days of Genesis 1?

Supports: Current evolutionary-creation and literary-framework reading, explicitly labeled as an advocacy perspective.

Sections 'Contrasting Views,' 'Textual Clues,' and 'Cultural Clues'

How Scholars' Perceptions of the Semantic Range of Yom Have Affected Their Discussions of the Age of the Universe: Part 3

Supports: Young-earth calendar-day argument, explicitly labeled as an advocacy perspective.

Part 3, lexical discussion and conclusions on yom, evening-morning, and Genesis 1:14–18

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Reader-facing Scripture wording, verse numbering, paragraph data, and supplied-word markup.

Exact location: Pinned eBible/CrossWire standardized 1769 KJV corpus, Genesis 1:1–2:3

Open source ↗

hebrew text morphology and lemma data

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible — Genesis

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible Project

Open Scriptures, Version 2.2 released 2021; repository inspected 2026

Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, verse structure, and the repeated creation formulas.

Exact location: Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 1:1–2:3

Open source ↗

Translation and textual notes

NET Bible — Genesis with translators' notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, Digital edition accessed 2026

Supports: Material syntax, translation, textual-variant, firmament, image, rule, and seventh-day notes.

Exact location: NET Bible, Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 translator and study notes

Open NET Genesis 1 ↗

modern open whole book commentary

Genesis

T. Desmond Alexander

The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023

Supports: Final-form movement, creation theology, human vocation, and relationship to the rest of Genesis.

Exact location: Genesis commentary, sections Genesis 1:1–2:3 and the book's creation overview

Open source ↗

modern critical open study guide

Genesis 1–2: Creation — Study Guide

Joel S. Baden and Yale Bible Study

Yale Divinity School, 2021 course; page inspected 2026

Supports: Critical grammatical, historical, genre, image, and compositional questions.

Exact location: Creation Study Guide, sections on Genesis 1:1 syntax, seven days, ancient cosmology, image of God, and the two creation accounts

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open literary study

Genesis 1:1–2:3 as a Prologue to the Book of Genesis

Ian Hart

Tyndale Bulletin 46.2, 1995

Supports: Genesis 1:1–2:3 as the book's prologue and the work, image, and Sabbath themes that orient Genesis.

Exact location: Tyndale Bulletin 46.2, pp. 315–336

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open literary study

Genesis 1–2 in Its Literary Context

Richard S. Hess

Tyndale Bulletin 41, 1990

Supports: Literary relationship of Genesis 1–2 and the toledot-linked structure.

Exact location: Tyndale Bulletin 41, pp. 143–153

Open source ↗

modern scholarly open composition study

Genesis' Two Creation Accounts Compiled and Interpreted as One

Konrad Schmid

TheTorah.com, 2023; updated 2026

Supports: Evidence and limits of a distinct-sources and final-combination reading.

Exact location: Sections 'The Two Creation Accounts' and 'The Redactional Interweaving of the Two Accounts'

Open source ↗

modern specialist ancient near eastern monograph

Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology

John H. Walton

Eisenbrauns; De Gruyter and Penn State University Press digital records, 2011

Supports: Walton's ancient functional-order and cosmic-rest proposals used as one material modern interpretation.

Exact location: Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology, chapters on ancient cosmology, functions, firmament, image, and divine rest

Open source ↗

modern scholarly literary and calendar study

The Liturgy of Creation: Understanding Calendars in Old Testament Context

Michael LeFebvre

IVP Academic, 2019

Supports: The liturgical-calendar reading and its disputed implications for chronology.

Exact location: The Liturgy of Creation, creation-week and calendar-law thesis as documented by IVP and Themelios 45.3 review

Open source ↗

modern evangelical multiple views survey

Evangelical Interpretations of Genesis 1–2

Todd S. Beall

The Gospel Coalition, Page inspected 2026

Supports: Major evangelical chronology and genre alternatives.

Exact location: Sections surveying calendar-day, gap, day-age, analogical-day, and framework interpretations

Open source ↗

modern christian science and interpretation survey

How Long Are the Days of Genesis 1?

BioLogos editorial team

BioLogos, Updated 2026

Supports: Current evolutionary-creation and literary-framework reading, explicitly labeled as an advocacy perspective.

Exact location: Sections 'Contrasting Views,' 'Textual Clues,' and 'Cultural Clues'

Open source ↗

young earth calendar day advocacy study

How Scholars' Perceptions of the Semantic Range of Yom Have Affected Their Discussions of the Age of the Universe: Part 3

R. E. Thompson

Answers Research Journal 12, 2019

Supports: Young-earth calendar-day argument, explicitly labeled as an advocacy perspective.

Exact location: Part 3, lexical discussion and conclusions on yom, evening-morning, and Genesis 1:14–18

Open source ↗

Genesis 1:1–2:3, King James Version

Why this sits here

How the passage moves

What the author is communicating

Why this reading fits

Evidence 1

Evidence 2

Evidence 3

Evidence 4

Evidence 5

A phrase that matters

Image / likeness

Have dominion / subdue

Rested / ceased

A needed correction

What remains true

How this should shape us

How should this shape us?

How should this shape us?

How should this shape us?

How should this shape us?

Teach it back

Go deeper

Evidence 1

Evidence 2

Evidence 3

Evidence 4

Evidence 5

In the beginning

Created

Spirit of God / wind from God

Firmament

Image / likeness

Have dominion / subdue

Rested / ceased

What the first readers would have understood

What the first readers would have understood

What the first readers would have understood

Why translations sometimes differ

Why translations sometimes differ

Why translations sometimes differ

Why translations sometimes differ

Earlier Scripture and inherited background

Earlier Scripture and inherited background

How this connects with the rest of Scripture

How this connects with the rest of Scripture

Textual variants

How should Genesis 1:1–3 be construed?

What kind of days and chronology does the section present?

How are Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 related?

Theological contribution

Theological contribution

Theological contribution

Genesis 1 does not function as a modern scientific report whose primary purpose is to give a technical mechanism or date for material origins.

The command to rule does not authorize exploitation, ecological carelessness, domination of vulnerable people, or unlimited human ownership.

The phrase 'Let us make' does not by itself prove a complete doctrine of the Trinity to the first hearers.

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible — Genesis

NET Bible — Genesis with translators' notes

Genesis

Genesis 1–2: Creation — Study Guide

Genesis 1:1–2:3 as a Prologue to the Book of Genesis

Genesis 1–2 in Its Literary Context

Genesis' Two Creation Accounts Compiled and Interpreted as One

Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology

The Liturgy of Creation: Understanding Calendars in Old Testament Context

Evangelical Interpretations of Genesis 1–2

How Long Are the Days of Genesis 1?

How Scholars' Perceptions of the Semantic Range of Yom Have Affected Their Discussions of the Age of the Universe: Part 3