Genesis 11:27–32, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Genesis 11:27–32
Terah's Family Moves Toward Canaan but Settles in Haran
A journey that stops short
Terah's generations begin with blockage. Haran dies. Sarai has no child. The household leaves Ur toward Canaan and settles in Haran. The coming promises will address a family that cannot produce land or offspring by its own momentum.
The text does not explain Haran's death, prove that Abram's brothers were triplets, or blame Sarai for childlessness. It names grief, dependence, and an unfinished migration.
How this should shape us
Tell the truth about grief, infertility, and interrupted plans. Do not treat those limits as evidence of lesser worth, and do not command someone else to relocate as if this scene were their call.
Teach it back
Explain how Genesis 11:27–32 prepares for Abram's call in chapter 12. Include the family loss, Sarai's childlessness, the unfinished movement toward Canaan, and one question the passage does not settle with certainty.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where was Ur of the Chaldees?
Best judgment: The traditional southern Ur remains a major identification, but the text does not settle the archaeological question. STUDstudy should name the uncertainty rather than make a map decide the exegesis.
How certain? strongWhen did Abram receive the call to leave?
Best judgment: Genesis clearly places the direct command after settlement in Haran, while Acts clearly locates a divine appearance in Mesopotamia. An earlier call or renewal is possible, but the exact sequence cannot be recovered with certainty from the surviving texts.
How certain? strongWas Sarai the same person as Iscah?
Best judgment: The text does not give enough information to identify Sarai and Iscah as the same person with confidence. The later identification belongs in reception history, not in the main genealogy as fact.
How certain? strongResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Displayed wording, family relations, migration, childlessness, chronology, and canonical sequence.
Genesis 11:27–32 in the pinned eng-kjv2006 source; compared with Genesis 12:1–5, Joshua 24:2–3, Acts 7:2–4, and Hebrews 11:8–10
Supports: Toledot heading, family syntax, death idiom, barrenness wording, migration clauses, destination, settlement, and age.
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 11:27–32
Supports: Death idiom, family relationships, Sarai and Iscah, verse 31's difficult syntax, translation comparison, and chronology cautions.
NET Bible, Genesis 11:27–32 and notes
Supports: Final-form transition, family problem, call, land, offspring, blessing, and worldwide horizon.
Genesis commentary, Genesis 11:27–12:9
Supports: Shift from primeval history to the ancestral family narrative and composition questions.
Genesis introduction and ancestral-narrative transition
Supports: Toledot boundary, family introduction, Ur geography debate, and transition to Abram.
Genesis, official Cambridge contents and introduction; commentary locators pp. 127–130 listed for Genesis 11:27–32
Supports: Terah's toledot panel, transition from linear genealogy to family narrative, and Abraham's role in the book's blessing movement.
Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 56.2 (2013), pp. 219–247, especially pp. 236–244
Supports: Terah-family opening, household leadership, verse 31 syntax, Sarai's barrenness as suspense, stopped migration, and Babel-to-blessing transition.
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 35.1 (2010), pp. 3–29, especially pp. 8–10 and notes 62–75
Supports: Genesis 11:31–12:4, Acts 7:2–4, Samaritan chronology, Jubilees, Abram's birth order, and limits of proposed reconciliations.
New Testament Studies 42.1 (1996), pp. 156–160, especially notes 13–37
Supports: Ur and Harran geography, northern and southern Ur proposals, lunar-cult associations, and the speculative status of religious-motive reconstruction.
Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie 27 (2020), pp. 49–64
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Displayed wording, family relations, migration, childlessness, chronology, and canonical sequence.
Exact location: Genesis 11:27–32 in the pinned eng-kjv2006 source; compared with Genesis 12:1–5, Joshua 24:2–3, Acts 7:2–4, and Hebrews 11:8–10
Open source ↗hebrew text morphology and lemma data
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible — Genesis
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible Project
Open Scriptures, Version 2.2 released 2021; repository inspected 2026
Supports: Toledot heading, family syntax, death idiom, barrenness wording, migration clauses, destination, settlement, and age.
Exact location: Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 11:27–32
Open source ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — Genesis with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, Digital edition accessed 2026
Supports: Death idiom, family relationships, Sarai and Iscah, verse 31's difficult syntax, translation comparison, and chronology cautions.
Exact location: NET Bible, Genesis 11:27–32 and notes
Open NET Genesis 11 ↗modern open whole book commentary
Genesis
T. Desmond Alexander
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023
Supports: Final-form transition, family problem, call, land, offspring, blessing, and worldwide horizon.
Exact location: Genesis commentary, Genesis 11:27–12:9
Open source ↗modern critical open study guide
The Book of Genesis — Introduction Study Guide
Joel S. Baden and Yale Bible Study
Yale Divinity School, 2021 course; page inspected 2026
Supports: Shift from primeval history to the ancestral family narrative and composition questions.
Exact location: Genesis introduction and ancestral-narrative transition
Open source ↗modern scholarly commentary publisher material
Genesis
Bill T. Arnold
Cambridge University Press, 2009
Supports: Toledot boundary, family introduction, Ur geography debate, and transition to Abram.
Exact location: Genesis, official Cambridge contents and introduction; commentary locators pp. 127–130 listed for Genesis 11:27–32
Open source ↗peer reviewed literary and theological structure study
The Blessing-Commission, the Promised Offspring, and the Toledot Structure of Genesis
Jason S. DeRouchie
Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 56.2, 2013
Supports: Terah's toledot panel, transition from linear genealogy to family narrative, and Abraham's role in the book's blessing movement.
Exact location: Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 56.2 (2013), pp. 219–247, especially pp. 236–244
Open source ↗peer reviewed literary and narrative study
Babel, Suspense, and the Introduction to the Terah-Abram Narrative
Mark A. Awabdy
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 35.1, 2010
Supports: Terah-family opening, household leadership, verse 31 syntax, Sarai's barrenness as suspense, stopped migration, and Babel-to-blessing transition.
Exact location: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 35.1 (2010), pp. 3–29, especially pp. 8–10 and notes 62–75
Open source ↗peer reviewed New Testament textual and chronological study
Acts 7.3 and Samaritan Chronology
Wayne Litke
New Testament Studies 42.1, 1996; Cambridge record published online 2009
Supports: Genesis 11:31–12:4, Acts 7:2–4, Samaritan chronology, Jubilees, Abram's birth order, and limits of proposed reconciliations.
Exact location: New Testament Studies 42.1 (1996), pp. 156–160, especially notes 13–37
Open source ↗peer reviewed open historical geography and religion study
The Journey of Terach from Ur to Harran as a Reflex of Lunar Cults in the Old Testament (Gen. 11:27–32)?
Andrzej Jędrzejczak
Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie 27, 2020
Supports: Ur and Harran geography, northern and southern Ur proposals, lunar-cult associations, and the speculative status of religious-motive reconstruction.
Exact location: Studia Koszalińsko-Kołobrzeskie 27 (2020), pp. 49–64
Open source ↗