Habakkuk 1:12-17, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Habakkuk 1:12-17
The Second Complaint: How Can the Holy God Use Greater Violence?
Confession first, then the protest against the instrument
Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction. Habakkuk does not drop holiness to ask the next question. He uses it.
Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity: wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he? More righteous is a comparison. It does not declare Judah sinless. The first complaint already named violence at home. Appointment for correction does not make merciless killing innocent.
Peoples treated as fish, and the net as a god
Men are made as the fishes of the sea, as the creeping things that have no ruler over them. The conqueror takes them with angle, net, and drag; he gathers them, rejoices, and sacrifices unto his net because by it his portion is fat and his meat plenteous.
Shall they therefore empty their net, and not spare continually to slay the nations? The image names capture without a shepherd. It does not give readers leave to call real peoples fish. The protest ends still speaking to God, asking whether killing without mercy will be allowed to run on.
How this should shape us
Keep the moral question open when someone claims God is using a predator. Refuse policies that harvest people as catch and then praise the gear. Relative guilt does not make victims expendable.
Teach it back
Explain Habakkuk 1:12-17 in your own words. Include its place in Habakkuk's complaint-answer-woe-prayer movement, the unit's main turn, one material uncertainty, and one misuse the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Textual details in verse 12 and the precise groups in view are disputed. The relative comparison, the conqueror's predation, and Habakkuk's appeal to God's holiness are much clearer than a complete historical reconstruction.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact displayed Scripture, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and canonical verse coverage.
Habakkuk 1:12-17, repository-pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated terms, clause relationships, and base forms behind translation discussion.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Hab.xml, 1:12-17
Supports: Verse-level translation, Hebrew, text-critical, literary, historical, and uncertainty notes.
NET Bible Habakkuk PDF, printed pp. 1771, translation and notes on 1:12-17
Supports: Whole-book setting, complaint-and-answer structure, 2:4, five woes, chapter 3 theophany, and closing trust.
Gowan, 'Habakkuk,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 601-604
Supports: Book movement, complaint and oracle forms, Chaldean horizon, 2:4, five woes, 2:20 transition, theophany, salvation, and the closing confidence.
Thompson, 'Prayer, Oracle and Theophany,' pp. 36-37
Supports: Competing identifications of the wicked, five-woe form, crimes, reversals, and the limits of a modern contextual application model.
Chitsulo, 'Exploring the Role of the Wicked,' section D.1, printed pp. 307-312
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact displayed Scripture, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and canonical verse coverage.
Exact location: Habakkuk 1:12-17, repository-pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Habakkuk
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, repeated terms, clause relationships, and base forms behind translation discussion.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Hab.xml, 1:12-17
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Habakkuk with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level translation, Hebrew, text-critical, literary, historical, and uncertainty notes.
Exact location: NET Bible Habakkuk PDF, printed pp. 1771, translation and notes on 1:12-17
Open source ↗modern critical commentary
Habakkuk
Donald E. Gowan
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, 2001
Supports: Whole-book setting, complaint-and-answer structure, 2:4, five woes, chapter 3 theophany, and closing trust.
Exact location: Gowan, 'Habakkuk,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 601-604
Open source ↗peer reviewed journal article
Prayer, Oracle and Theophany: The Book of Habakkuk
Michael E. W. Thompson
Tyndale Bulletin 44.1, 1993
Supports: Book movement, complaint and oracle forms, Chaldean horizon, 2:4, five woes, 2:20 transition, theophany, salvation, and the closing confidence.
Exact location: Thompson, 'Prayer, Oracle and Theophany,' pp. 36-37
Open source ↗peer reviewed contextual biblical study
Exploring the Role of the Wicked in Habakkuk from Malawi Socio-Economic and Political Viewpoint
Takuze Saul Chitsulo
Old Testament Essays 28.2, 2015
Supports: Competing identifications of the wicked, five-woe form, crimes, reversals, and the limits of a modern contextual application model.
Exact location: Chitsulo, 'Exploring the Role of the Wicked,' section D.1, printed pp. 307-312
Open source ↗