Hosea 3:1-5, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Hosea 3:1-5
A Purchased and Restricted Relationship Images Israel's Deprivation and Return
Love is commanded again, and the woman is acquired with silver and barley
Go yet, love a woman beloved of her friend, yet an adulteress, according to the love of the LORD toward the children of Israel. Hosea buys her for fifteen pieces of silver and a homer and a half of barley. The woman is unnamed. She may be Gomer; she may not. The legal category of the payment — bride-price, debt, redemption, something nearer to sale — is not given, and her consent is not given.
The sign is costly continued commitment. It is not a warrant to buy, traffic, own, or sexually control a person. Flagons of wine in the KJV are raisin cakes, likely festive or cultic food, not a character sketch. Do not invent a biography that the five verses withhold.
Many days without king or cult, then seeking
She is told to abide many days without playing the harlot and without another man; Hosea says he will be for her likewise. The interpretation is national: Israel shall abide many days without king, prince, sacrifice, image, ephod, and teraphim. Afterward they return and seek the LORD their God and David their king, and fear the LORD and his goodness in the latter days.
The waiting images political and cultic emptiness after collapse, not a technique for isolating a spouse. Latter days is a future horizon inside the book, not a calendar. Davidic hope may be original northern speech, later Judean shaping, or both. It does not crown a modern monarchy, and it does not turn the woman's restriction into a pastoral method.
How this should shape us
Teach the analogy of deprivation and return without baptizing the transaction. Coercive control, trafficking, and sexual confinement are evils to report, not Hosea 3 to imitate.
Teach it back
Explain Hosea 3:1-5 in your own words. Include its place in Hosea's prophetic movement, one material uncertainty, and one use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: One woman or two, historical sequel or second sign, redemption or purchase, voluntary or coercive waiting, evaluation of cult objects, and Davidic redaction are all disputed. The package prefers literary continuity without pretending the woman's identity or consent is known.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Hosea 3:1-5, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew, morphology, syntax, names, wordplay, repetitions, and the base text for translation questions.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Hos.xml, 3:1-5
Supports: Verse-level translation, textual, grammatical, historical, rhetorical, and uncertainty notes.
NET Bible Hosea PDF, printed pp. 1677-1678, translation and notes on 3:1-5
Supports: Whole-book movement, eighth-century setting, literary boundaries, composition, Baal polemic, empire, and verse-level alternatives.
John Day, 'Hosea,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 572-574, discussion of 3:1-5
Supports: Marriage metaphor, biography-symbol alternatives, gender hierarchy, domestic and sexual violence, victim blaming, and Hosea 11's parental counter-image.
Hadjiev, '(Not) Her Husband,' pp. 2-10, especially traditional and feminist readings pp. 2-5 and suspicion, trust, and the wider book pp. 6-10; applied to 3:1-5
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: Hosea 3:1-5, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Hosea
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew, morphology, syntax, names, wordplay, repetitions, and the base text for translation questions.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Hos.xml, 3:1-5
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Hosea with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level translation, textual, grammatical, historical, rhetorical, and uncertainty notes.
Exact location: NET Bible Hosea PDF, printed pp. 1677-1678, translation and notes on 3:1-5
Open source ↗scholarly commentary article
Hosea
John Day
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, edited by John Barton and John Muddiman, 2001
Supports: Whole-book movement, eighth-century setting, literary boundaries, composition, Baal polemic, empire, and verse-level alternatives.
Exact location: John Day, 'Hosea,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 572-574, discussion of 3:1-5
Open source ↗peer reviewed open access article
(Not) Her Husband: Hosea's God and Ricoeur's Hermeneutics of Suspicion and Trust
Tchavdar S. Hadjiev
Religions 13.2, article 163, 2022
Supports: Marriage metaphor, biography-symbol alternatives, gender hierarchy, domestic and sexual violence, victim blaming, and Hosea 11's parental counter-image.
Exact location: Hadjiev, '(Not) Her Husband,' pp. 2-10, especially traditional and feminist readings pp. 2-5 and suspicion, trust, and the wider book pp. 6-10; applied to 3:1-5
Open source ↗