Read the passage and its setting
John 10:31-39, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
John 10:31-39
Jesus Answers a Blasphemy Charge with Scripture and Works
The Main Point
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
What Is Happening Here?
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works. John presents it as gospel_narrative and dialogue_or_witness_scene.
What Came Before—and What Comes Next?
John 10:22-30 has just shown: During the winter Feast of Dedication, Jesus answers a demand for plain messianic identity by appealing to his works, sheep who hear and follow, secure life in the Father's hand, and the declaration that he and the Father are one.
John 10:40-42 next develops: Jesus withdraws to the place of John's first baptizing, where many remember that John performed no sign but spoke truthfully about Jesus, and many believe.
Follow John's Narrative Movement
See why this section appears here and how the author's narrative movement leads to its meaning.
Why Is This Passage Here?
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works. Its placement advances John's sequence from revelation and witness through signs and festivals to the hour, Farewell Discourses, Passion, resurrection, and written testimony.
Follow the Sign, Speech, or Scene
John 10:31-39 is a coherent Johannine movement titled “Jesus Answers a Blasphemy Charge with Scripture and Works.” The change in speaker, place, audience, festival setting, or narrated response at each edge gives this unit its natural limits.
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
What Is the Author Saying?
Why This Interpretation Fits
What this movement communicates
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Where responsible readings differ
Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries
Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.
Words That Matter
the good shepherd
ποιμὴν ὁ καλός · poimēn ho kalos
the good shepherd
What the Passage Is Not Saying
The boundaries below protect John 10:31-39 from anti-Jewish, coercive, speculative, and passage-detached use.
You are gods does not teach that humans can become autonomous deities.
The attempted stoning does not justify collective blame of Jewish people.
Jesus' appeal to works does not authorize leaders to make themselves unaccountable.
Context check: These limits preserve the unit's actual force: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
What Remains True Today
Faithful reading of John 10:31-39 receives its truth through Jesus' Jewish, embodied, cross-shaped mission and refuses anti-Judaism, coercion, domination, spiritual abuse, speculative certainty, or harm to vulnerable people.
Respond and Remember
Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.
How This Should Shape Us
Why these applications follow
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Faithful reading of John 10:31-39 receives its truth through Jesus' Jewish, embodied, cross-shaped mission and refuses anti-Judaism, coercion, domination, spiritual abuse, speculative certainty, or harm to vulnerable people.
What faithful practice follows?
Answer grave charges with careful Scripture and observable works, while refusing both mob violence and inflated claims of human divinity.
A Concrete Example
When John 10:31-39 is taught, identify its speakers and first-century setting, state the material uncertainty before application, and practice this response: Answer grave charges with careful Scripture and observable works, while refusing both mob violence and inflated claims of human divinity.
Teach It Back
Explain John 10:31-39 in your own words. Include its place in John's movement, the decisive claim or action, one sourced uncertainty, and one use the passage does not authorize.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go Deeper
The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.
Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
What this movement communicates
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Where responsible readings differ
Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps
the good shepherd
the good shepherd is a recurring Johannine term or phrase whose force in John 10:31-39 is selected by this scene, not by importing every possible dictionary gloss.
How certain? probableWhat the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture
Jewish life under Roman power
John 10:31-39 belongs to a first-century Jewish world of Scripture, festivals, temple, synagogue, households, villages, Judea, Galilee, Samaria, diaspora, priestly authority, and Roman rule as locally relevant. The reconstruction remains bounded by: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
How certain? probableWhy translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices
KJV language in 10:31-39
The pinned KJV remains displayed exactly. SBLGNT, STEP, and NET comparison clarify older English, sentence relations, and the material question in this unit: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
How certain? probableEarlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas
Israel's Scriptures and Jewish identity
John 10:31-39 must be read inside Jesus' and the disciples' Jewish identity, Israel's Scriptures and festivals, and a range of Jewish responses. Historically specific opponents cannot become a timeless ethnic collective.
How certain? strongHow this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary
Gospel and canonical relationships
John's own wording and sequence control John 10:31-39. Synoptic similarities and differences, Israel's Scriptures, and later canonical reflection may clarify reception but cannot flatten John's distinctive chronology, dialogue, signs, or theology.
How certain? probableTextual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning
No reviewed textual variant changes John 10:31-39's central movement; SBLGNT and NET were still checked against the pinned KJV.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do responsible interpreters differ?
Best judgment: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
How certain? probableTheology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section
Theological contribution
God's self-disclosure in Jesus, the Father's sending, the Spirit's work, truthful witness, believing life, love, glory through the cross, and resurrection hope govern John 10:31-39.
How certain? strongTheological contribution
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
How certain? strongCommon ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading
You are gods does not teach that humans can become autonomous deities.
A memorable line in John 10:31-39 can be detached from its speakers, Jewish and Roman setting, narrative irony, and John's movement toward the hour.
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Read the complete movement and preserve this control: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
You are gods does not teach that humans can become autonomous deities.
The attempted stoning does not justify collective blame of Jewish people.
A memorable line in John 10:31-39 can be detached from its speakers, Jewish and Roman setting, narrative irony, and John's movement toward the hour.
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Read the complete movement and preserve this control: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
The attempted stoning does not justify collective blame of Jewish people.
Jesus' appeal to works does not authorize leaders to make themselves unaccountable.
A memorable line in John 10:31-39 can be detached from its speakers, Jewish and Roman setting, narrative irony, and John's movement toward the hour.
After an attempted stoning, Jesus asks which good work warrants it, hears a blasphemy charge, cites the scriptural 'gods' saying, and asks hearers to judge his consecrated Son-of-God claim through the Father's works.
Read the complete movement and preserve this control: Psalm 82's 'gods' is used as an argument from Scripture's wording, not a claim that humans are divine in the same sense as Jesus. 'Your law' does not distance Jesus from Jewish Scripture. The opponents are specific Judean authorities, and the violence must not be generalized.
Jesus' appeal to works does not authorize leaders to make themselves unaccountable.
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.
John 10:31-39, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and critical-text reading checked independently of the KJV.
Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/John.txt, 10:31-39
Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.
STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT John data, rows for 10:31-39
Supports: Verse-level syntax, older-English clarification, material variants, background, and alternatives.
NET Bible John PDF, John 10:31-39 and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Supports: Current historical-critical synthesis, narrative movement, Jewish context, signs, Christology, Spirit, Passion, and resurrection.
Enter the Bible John course, Outline, Theological Themes, and Book of Signs materials; applied to 10:31-39
Supports: Literary, historical, theological, gender-aware, sacramental, and reader-oriented interpretation.
Yale Bible Study, Gospel of John course, Blind Man and Festival Controversies study guide; applied to 10:31-39
Supports: Complete confessional evangelical interpretation, represented as a strong traditioned view rather than consensus.
Köstenberger, “John,” commentary heading covering John 10:31-39
Supports: Historically specific Jewish referents, varied responses, Jewish identity, Roman agency, reception danger, and anti-violence safeguards.
Anderson, “Anti-Semitism and Religious Violence,” full PDF, especially terminology and Ioudaioi pp. 1–22, historical models pp. 23–46, Passion and reception pp. 47–65, safeguards and appendices pp. 66–77; applied to 10:31-39
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.
Exact location: John 10:31-39, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗Greek textual evidence
The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition
Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos
Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010
Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and critical-text reading checked independently of the KJV.
Exact location: Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/John.txt, 10:31-39
Open the John Greek text file ↗Lexical and grammatical evidence
STEP Bible Data
Tyndale House Cambridge
Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026
Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.
Exact location: STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT John data, rows for 10:31-39
Open source ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — John with translators' and textual notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition
Supports: Verse-level syntax, older-English clarification, material variants, background, and alternatives.
Exact location: NET Bible John PDF, John 10:31-39 and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Open the official NET John PDF ↗modern scholarly book introduction
John course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world
Craig R. Koester; revised by Karoline M. Lewis
Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2024 revision; current course inspected 2026
Supports: Current historical-critical synthesis, narrative movement, Jewish context, signs, Christology, Spirit, Passion, and resurrection.
Exact location: Enter the Bible John course, Outline, Theological Themes, and Book of Signs materials; applied to 10:31-39
Open the Enter the Bible John course ↗modern scholarly narrative and theological course
The Gospel of John: course introduction and twelve study guides
Harold W. Attridge and Michal Beth Dinkler
Yale Bible Study, Yale Divinity School, Current online edition inspected 2026
Supports: Literary, historical, theological, gender-aware, sacramental, and reader-oriented interpretation.
Exact location: Yale Bible Study, Gospel of John course, Blind Man and Festival Controversies study guide; applied to 10:31-39
Open the Yale Gospel of John course ↗modern open confessional commentary
John
Andreas J. Köstenberger
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, Current online edition inspected 2026
Supports: Complete confessional evangelical interpretation, represented as a strong traditioned view rather than consensus.
Exact location: Köstenberger, “John,” commentary heading covering John 10:31-39
Open Köstenberger's John commentary ↗modern scholarly ethical and historical study
Anti-Semitism and Religious Violence as Flawed Interpretations of the Gospel of John
Paul N. Anderson
Bible and Interpretation; expanded from John and Judaism, SBL Resources for Biblical Study 87, 2017
Supports: Historically specific Jewish referents, varied responses, Jewish identity, Roman agency, reception danger, and anti-violence safeguards.
Exact location: Anderson, “Anti-Semitism and Religious Violence,” full PDF, especially terminology and Ioudaioi pp. 1–22, historical models pp. 23–46, Passion and reception pp. 47–65, safeguards and appendices pp. 66–77; applied to 10:31-39
Open Anderson's full study ↗