Verse Lens · Expanded explanation
Joshua 7:25 Explained in Context
Use this verse as a doorway into the larger passage—not as an isolated saying.
Verse 25. 25And Joshua said, Why hast thou troubled us? the LORD shall trouble thee this day. And all Israel stoned him with stones, and burned them with fire, after they had stoned them with stones.
King James Version — public domain in the United States · Bible text and permissions
Quick Meaning
Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation.
Messengers find the goods under the tent
This verse is one part of that explanation in Joshua 7:22-26. The complete section carries the connected meaning and how it should shape life.
Read It With
- Joshua 7:22–26
Read Joshua 7:25 with 7:22–26. Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation. The complete unit establishes this movement: Messengers recover the goods; Achan, children, animals, tent, and possessions are brought to Achor, where Israel stones and burns them and raises a heap before divine anger turns away.
Why This Verse Appears Here
Joshua 7:16-21 ends with this movement: Achan names desire, theft, and the precise hiding place. Joshua 7:22-26 begins with this next step: Physical evidence is found beneath the tent. It reaches this outcome: Stoning, burning, a stone heap, and turned anger close the crisis. This movement materially develops the book's concern with Achan's children and animals, singular-plural ambiguity, collective punishment, due process, and refusal of modern imitation. At Joshua 7:25, this verse contributes the following distinct step: Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation.
Follow the Context
- Physical evidence is found beneath the tent.
- The entire household and property are assembled in the valley.
- Stoning, burning, a stone heap, and turned anger close the crisis.
Phrase-by-Phrase Explanation
“And Joshua said, Why hast thou troubled us? the LORD…”
In plain language: Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation.
Messengers recover the goods; Achan, children, animals, tent, and possessions are brought to Achor, where Israel stones and burns them and raises a heap before divine anger turns away. Within that movement, this wording Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation.
Why it matters: This wording carries a material narrative, lexical, textual, historical, theological, ethical, or misuse boundary.
How certain? probableWhat This Verse Is Not Saying
This morally severe scene does not authorize collective punishment, killing children, family retaliation, lynching, asset destruction, or claims that violence purges communal sin today. Read Joshua 7:25 with Joshua 7:22–26. In context, the verse Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation.
What Remains True
Joshua 7:25 contributes this bounded enduring truth: Hidden wrongdoing can harm a community, but accountability must not erase evidence, due process, individual responsibility, or the protection of children and families.
Teach It Back
Explain Joshua 7:25's contribution to Joshua 7:22-26: Joshua 7:25 uses singular and plural language around stoning and burning; the ambiguity does not erase the children's presence or authorize family retaliation. Include what the surrounding verses add, one material uncertainty or ethical cost, and what this verse does not authorize today.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Continue in Context
Read the complete section for the connected explanation and how it should shape life. This verse is a doorway into that passage, not a saying that stands alone.
Read Joshua 7:22-26 — Achan's Household Is Destroyed in the Valley of AchorSources used for this Verse Lens
How certain is this explanation? probable
Where care is needed
Interpreters differ over the composition, historical value, textual form, geography, and theological judgment of “Achan's Household Is Destroyed in the Valley of Achor.” Confidence is strongest in the final-form movement summarized here; reconstructions beyond it remain labeled and limited.
These are the sources used directly for this lens. Language, grammar, disagreements, and the complete source shelf remain attached to the full thought-unit research record.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: Joshua 7:22-26, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Joshua
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, clauses, names, repeated roots, boundary formulas, covenant terms, and the base text behind translation discussion.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Josh.xml, 7:22–26
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Joshua with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level Hebrew, textual, translation, list, number, geographical, historical, and cross-reference notes.
Exact location: NET Bible Joshua PDF, printed pp. 428-429, translation and translator notes on 7:22–26
Open source ↗scholarly commentary article
Joshua
Richard D. Nelson
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, edited by John Barton and John Muddiman, 2001
Supports: Whole-book movement, literary boundaries, composition, history and archaeology limits, geography, theology, and material interpretive alternatives.
Exact location: Nelson, 'Joshua,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 164-165, discussion of 7:22–26
Open source ↗peer reviewed research review
The Book of Joshua in Recent Research
Thomas B. Dozeman
Currents in Biblical Research 15.3, 2017
Supports: Modern research plurality across textual criticism, composition, history, archaeology, geography, violence, ideology, and reception.
Exact location: Dozeman, 'The Book of Joshua in Recent Research,' Currents in Biblical Research 15.3 (2017), printed pp. 270–288; research categories and bibliography applied cautiously to 7:22–26
Open source ↗peer reviewed open access ethical and literary study
A Theological Response to Biblical Violence
Erika Barnard and Esias E. Meyer
Scriptura 119.1, 2020
Supports: The conquest narrative's violent literary and ideological functions and the need for explicit modern ethical resistance.
Exact location: Barnard and Meyer, 'A Theological Response to Biblical Violence,' Scriptura 119.1 (2020), printed pp. 1–15, especially pp. 7–15 on Joshua 6–11, literary setting, social identity, hybridity, courage, fear, and ethical response; 7:22–26
Open source ↗peer reviewed article record and abstract
A Reading of Recovery for an Ethical Interpretation of Joshua Herem Passages
Ki-Min Bang
Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 27.1, 2021
Supports: One modern recovery-reading alternative that distinguishes divine speech from Joshua's actions and explicitly rejects genocidal application.
Exact location: Bang, 'A Reading of Recovery for an Ethical Interpretation of Joshua Herem Passages,' KJOTS 27.1 (2021), official English abstract and article record for pp. 61–96; case-study scope 7:22–26
Open source ↗peer reviewed article record and abstract
The Making of the Sin of Achan (Joshua 7)
Joshua Berman
Biblical Interpretation 22.2, 2014
Supports: The unusual collective-blame problem, limits of easy corporate-personality explanations, and the rhetorical significance of the spies' report.
Exact location: Berman, 'The Making of the Sin of Achan (Joshua 7),' Biblical Interpretation 22.2 (2014), official abstract and record for pp. 115–131; applied to 7:22–26
Open source ↗peer reviewed open access textual study
The Battle against Ai and the Textual History of the Book of Joshua
Kristin De Troyer
Journal of Septuagint and Cognate Studies 48, 2015
Supports: Masoretic, Old Greek, Qumran, and revision evidence plus a focused case study showing why ancient textual differences require visible limits.
Exact location: De Troyer, 'The Battle against Ai and the Textual History of the Book of Joshua,' JSCS 48 (2015), printed pp. 39–53, especially pp. 39–43 on book-wide MT-OG differences and pp. 43–53 on Joshua 8; applied to 7:22–26
Open source ↗