Judges 10:6–16, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Judges 10:6–16
Israel's confession is tested beyond crisis words
Israel serves many gods, and oppression comes from two sides
The children of Israel do evil again, serve Baalim, Ashtaroth, the gods of Syria, Zidon, Moab, the children of Ammon, and the Philistines, and forsake the LORD, and serve him not. The LORD's anger is hot. He sells them into the hands of the Philistines and of the children of Ammon. That year they vex and oppress the children of Israel eighteen years, all Israel beyond Jordan in the land of the Amorites, Gilead, and Ammon also crosses to fight Judah, Benjamin, and the house of Ephraim. Israel is sore distressed.
The compressed list of gods and oppressors may gather several memories. Ancient names are not coded modern groups. Suffering does not prove that every victim secretly worshiped the wrong god. Israel's failure is covenant critique within Jewish Scripture, never a warrant for contempt toward Jewish people.
God refuses a cry that still keeps the other gods, then grief meets enacted turning
Israel cries, We have sinned against thee, both because we have forsaken our God and also served Baalim. The LORD answers with a history of deliverance from Egypt, Amorites, Ammon, Philistines, Zidonians, Amalek, and Maon, and with a refusal: ye have forsaken me and served other gods; wherefore I will deliver you no more. Go and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen; let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation.
The children of Israel say, We have sinned: do thou unto us whatsoever seemeth good unto thee; deliver us only, we pray thee, this day. They put away the strange gods from among them and serve the LORD. His soul is grieved for the misery of Israel, a shortening of patience that marks compassion toward misery. Emergency language is not enough. Removal of the gods makes the confession concrete. Repentance is not a technique that controls the next military outcome. Verse 17 will still open onto assembled armies.
How this should shape us
When an institution confesses harm, require the harmful system to be actually removed, and relieve people who are still in misery. An apology without surrendered control is the cry God refused here.
Teach it back
Explain Judges 10:6–16 in your own words. Include its scene movement, one source-supported detail, one material uncertainty, and one conclusion or imitation the complete context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: The theology of divine change and the literary history of this speech are debated. In the final narrative, refusal tests the cry and compassionate grief follows actual removal of the gods.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Judges 10:6–16, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, names, clause relationships, repeated terms, wordplays, and translation control.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Judg.xml, 10:6–16
Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, textual, poetic, geographical, social, and uncertainty notes.
NET Bible Judges PDF, printed pp. 471, translation and notes on 10:6–16
Supports: Recent whole-book literary organization, differentiated judge portraits, progressive decline, Abimelech, Samson, and the double epilogue within the limits of preview access.
Assis, Before There Were Kings, inspected contents and exposed summaries for the relevant literary section, printed pp. 240-284
Supports: Compositional alternatives, rhetorical relationships among prologue, central narratives, and epilogues, and the material YHWH-kingship alternative for the no-king refrain.
Wong, Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges, University of Edinburgh repository abstract and chapter descriptions
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: Judges 10:6–16, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Judges
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, names, clause relationships, repeated terms, wordplays, and translation control.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Judg.xml, 10:6–16
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Judges with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, textual, poetic, geographical, social, and uncertainty notes.
Exact location: NET Bible Judges PDF, printed pp. 471, translation and notes on 10:6–16
Open source ↗modern scholarly monograph preview
Before There Were Kings: A Literary Analysis of the Book of Judges
Elie Assis
Penn State University Press / Eisenbrauns, 2024
Supports: Recent whole-book literary organization, differentiated judge portraits, progressive decline, Abimelech, Samson, and the double epilogue within the limits of preview access.
Exact location: Assis, Before There Were Kings, inspected contents and exposed summaries for the relevant literary section, printed pp. 240-284
Open source ↗doctoral thesis repository record
Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges: An Inductive, Rhetorical Study
Gregory T. K. Wong
University of Edinburgh, 2005
Supports: Compositional alternatives, rhetorical relationships among prologue, central narratives, and epilogues, and the material YHWH-kingship alternative for the no-king refrain.
Exact location: Wong, Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges, University of Edinburgh repository abstract and chapter descriptions
Open source ↗