Section 52 of 7315:9–13Judges
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Judges 2:18, Judg 2:18, or Jdg 2:18.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Judges 15:9–13, King James Version

King James VersionJudges 15:9–13

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Judges 15:9–13

Judah binds its own deliverer under occupation

Philistines camp in Judah to seize Samson. Judah asks why and learns they seek retaliation. Three thousand Judahites confront Samson, saying Philistines rule them. Samson cites his own retaliatory rule; they promise not to kill him, bind him with two new cords, and deliver him up.

Why this sits here

The scene reveals accommodation under domination and Samson's own symmetrical vengeance ethic, while Judah negotiates survival by handing over one of its own.

How the passage moves

  1. Philistine forces enter Judah in pursuit of Samson.

  2. Judah treats Philistine rule as a settled reality and sends an overwhelming delegation to arrest him.

  3. Samson secures a promise against immediate killing and permits himself to be bound and handed over.

What the author is communicating

Philistine power has shaped Judah's imagination, while Samson's private vengeance offers no safe communal alternative; both occupation and uncontrolled retaliation constrain the people.

A needed correction

Reading Judges 15:9–13 inside Judges' complete descent-and-deliverance movement rules out these uses:

People living under occupation should not be simplistically condemned from safety.

Samson's surrender does not approve coercive extradition.

Measure-for-measure language does not authorize private revenge.

What remains true

Oppression can normalize submission, while a self-appointed avenger can leave the community without a trustworthy path to safety.

How this should shape us

How should this shape us today?

Protect civilians under coercive rule and build accountable resistance or legal advocacy that does not depend on one person's revenge.

Teach it back

Explain Judges 15:9–13 in your own words. Include its scene movement, one source-supported detail, one material uncertainty, and one conclusion or imitation the complete context rules out.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Judges 15:9–13

Scene 1

Philistine forces enter Judah in pursuit of Samson.

Judges 15:9–13

Scene 2

Judah treats Philistine rule as a settled reality and sends an overwhelming delegation to arrest him.

Judges 15:9–13

Scene 3

Samson secures a promise against immediate killing and permits himself to be bound and handed over.

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

rule over us

Judah openly acknowledges Philistine governance, a striking absence of resistance.

How certain? probable

as they did unto me

Samson states a measure-for-measure vengeance principle rather than a public justice process.

How certain? probable
What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

Ancient setting and reconstruction limits

Border domination and local accommodation are plausible, yet numbers and specific deployment cannot be externally confirmed. Modern occupied peoples must not be judged by simplistic analogy.

How certain? probable
Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

KJV wording and material alternatives

KJV 'went up' is military deployment. 'Two new cords' emphasizes apparently unused strong restraints, not a magical material.

How certain? probable
Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Judges within Israel's Scriptures

Earlier judges rally Israel; here Judah arrests the deliverer. Samson's retaliation formula resembles, but does not fulfill, proportional public justice because he remains sole judge of injury and response.

How certain? strong
How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

Responsible canonical connections

Earlier judges rally Israel; here Judah arrests the deliverer. Samson's retaliation formula resembles, but does not fulfill, proportional public justice because he remains sole judge of injury and response.

How certain? probable
Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

Textual and grammatical care

Judah's action can be read as cowardice, pragmatic civilian protection, complicity, or a mixture under occupation. The narrative provides their fear and Samson's cooperation but no simple verdict.

How certain? probable
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters disagree?

Best judgment: Readers weigh Judah's responsibility differently because the text shows both large numbers and real imperial pressure. Confidence should remain higher in the scene's portrayal of accommodation than in assigning individual motives.

How certain? probable
Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

Philistine power has shaped Judah's imagination, while Samson's private vengeance offers no safe communal alternative; both occupation and uncontrolled retaliation constrain the people.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

This movement contributes to Judges' pattern of covenant breach, compassion, compromised deliverance, and accelerating social disorder: Philistines camp in Judah to seize Samson. Judah asks why and learns they seek retaliation. Three thousand Judahites confront Samson, saying Philistines rule them. Samson cites his own retaliatory rule; they promise not to kill him, bind him with two new cords, and deliver him up.

How certain? strong
Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

People living under occupation should not be simplistically condemned from safety.

Why it is attractive

A vivid act or divine-agency statement can be detached from the full scene and treated as approval.

What context changes

Philistine power has shaped Judah's imagination, while Samson's private vengeance offers no safe communal alternative; both occupation and uncontrolled retaliation constrain the people.

A stronger reading

Oppression can normalize submission, while a self-appointed avenger can leave the community without a trustworthy path to safety.

What truth can remain

Philistines camp in Judah to seize Samson. Judah asks why and learns they seek retaliation. Three thousand Judahites confront Samson, saying Philistines rule them. Samson cites his own retaliatory rule; they promise not to kill him, bind him with two new cords, and deliver him up.

Samson's surrender does not approve coercive extradition.

Why it is attractive

Readers may preserve a leader's honor by shifting cost onto a woman, child, outsider, disabled person, or other vulnerable participant.

What context changes

Philistine power has shaped Judah's imagination, while Samson's private vengeance offers no safe communal alternative; both occupation and uncontrolled retaliation constrain the people.

A stronger reading

Oppression can normalize submission, while a self-appointed avenger can leave the community without a trustworthy path to safety.

What truth can remain

Philistines camp in Judah to seize Samson. Judah asks why and learns they seek retaliation. Three thousand Judahites confront Samson, saying Philistines rule them. Samson cites his own retaliatory rule; they promise not to kill him, bind him with two new cords, and deliver him up.

Measure-for-measure language does not authorize private revenge.

Why it is attractive

Ancient people, land, warfare, and kingship language can be forced into a modern map the text does not supply.

What context changes

Philistine power has shaped Judah's imagination, while Samson's private vengeance offers no safe communal alternative; both occupation and uncontrolled retaliation constrain the people.

A stronger reading

Oppression can normalize submission, while a self-appointed avenger can leave the community without a trustworthy path to safety.

What truth can remain

Philistines camp in Judah to seize Samson. Judah asks why and learns they seek retaliation. Three thousand Judahites confront Samson, saying Philistines rule them. Samson cites his own retaliatory rule; they promise not to kill him, bind him with two new cords, and deliver him up.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.

Judges 15:9–13, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Judges

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, names, clause relationships, repeated terms, wordplays, and translation control.

Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Judg.xml, 15:9–13

NET Bible: Judges with translators' notes

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, textual, poetic, geographical, social, and uncertainty notes.

NET Bible Judges PDF, printed pp. 478-479, translation and notes on 15:9–13

Before There Were Kings: A Literary Analysis of the Book of Judges

Supports: Recent whole-book literary organization, differentiated judge portraits, progressive decline, Abimelech, Samson, and the double epilogue within the limits of preview access.

Assis, Before There Were Kings, inspected contents and exposed summaries for the relevant literary section, printed pp. 285-340

Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges: An Inductive, Rhetorical Study

Supports: Compositional alternatives, rhetorical relationships among prologue, central narratives, and epilogues, and the material YHWH-kingship alternative for the no-king refrain.

Wong, Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges, University of Edinburgh repository abstract and chapter descriptions

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.

Exact location: Judges 15:9–13, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open source ↗

hebrew text and morphology

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Judges

Open Scriptures

Open Scriptures, release 2.2

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, names, clause relationships, repeated terms, wordplays, and translation control.

Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Judg.xml, 15:9–13

Open source ↗

translation and translator notes

NET Bible: Judges with translators' notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2006

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, textual, poetic, geographical, social, and uncertainty notes.

Exact location: NET Bible Judges PDF, printed pp. 478-479, translation and notes on 15:9–13

Open source ↗

modern scholarly monograph preview

Before There Were Kings: A Literary Analysis of the Book of Judges

Elie Assis

Penn State University Press / Eisenbrauns, 2024

Supports: Recent whole-book literary organization, differentiated judge portraits, progressive decline, Abimelech, Samson, and the double epilogue within the limits of preview access.

Exact location: Assis, Before There Were Kings, inspected contents and exposed summaries for the relevant literary section, printed pp. 285-340

Open source ↗

doctoral thesis repository record

Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges: An Inductive, Rhetorical Study

Gregory T. K. Wong

University of Edinburgh, 2005

Supports: Compositional alternatives, rhetorical relationships among prologue, central narratives, and epilogues, and the material YHWH-kingship alternative for the no-king refrain.

Exact location: Wong, Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges, University of Edinburgh repository abstract and chapter descriptions

Open source ↗