Section 7 of 771:40-45Mark
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Mark 10:45, Mk 10:45, or Mr 10:45.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Read the passage and its setting

Mark 1:40-45, King James Version

Mark 1:40-45

Jesus Cleanses a Man and Exchanges Places with Him

The Main Point

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

What Is Happening Here?

Mark 1:40-45 opens with “And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him…” and closes with “But he went out, and began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the matter, insomuch that….”

Context That Shapes This Passage

How does this passage relate?

Mark 1:40-45

In “Jesus Cleanses a Man and Exchanges Places with Him,” the complete unit develops this passage-specific claim: A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

Why this relationship fits: The reviewed reasoning path begins, “A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness” and concludes, “then must remain outside as the public report spreads.”

What earlier material does it rely on?

Mark 1:35-39

The cleansing extends Jesus' authority to a person carrying ritual and social exclusion; the man's public report then reverses locations, leaving Jesus outside while crowds seek him.

Why this relationship fits: Mark 1:35-39 closes with “And he preached in their synagogues throughout all Galilee, and cast out devils”; Mark 1:40-45 opens with “And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him….”

Where does this sit in the whole book?

Mark as a whole

Mark 1:40-45 belongs to the opening Galilean movement where kingdom authority produces release, calling, controversy, and the first death plot. Its contribution is: A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

Why this relationship fits: Mark 1:40-45 opens with “And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him…” and closes with “But he went out, and began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the matter, insomuch that….” The reviewed movement runs from “A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness” to “then must remain outside as the public report spreads.” The unit's reviewed main point is: A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

Stage 2 of 4

Follow Mark's Narrative Movement

See why this section appears here and how the author's narrative movement leads to its meaning.

Why Is This Passage Here?

The cleansing extends Jesus' authority to a person carrying ritual and social exclusion; the man's public report then reverses locations, leaving Jesus outside while crowds seek him.

Follow the Scene

  1. A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness

  2. Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification

  3. then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

Why This Interpretation Fits

Narrative and structural evidence

Mark 1:40-45 opens with “And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him…” and closes with “But he went out, and began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the matter, insomuch that….” The internal movement runs from “A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness” to “then must remain outside as the public report spreads.”

Interpretive limit or uncertainty

KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

Stage 3 of 4

Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries

Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.

Words That Matter

moved with compassion

σπλαγχνισθείς · splanchnistheis

moved with compassion

What the Passage Is Not Saying

Reading Mark 1:40-45 in its complete Markan, Jewish, first-century, and Passion-shaped setting rules out these uses:

The cleansing does not authorize stigma toward people with Hansen's disease or visible conditions.

The command to silence does not justify concealing abuse or public danger.

Touch in this story does not override consent or infection precautions.

Context check: A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

What Remains True Today

Jesus restores a stigmatized man through willing compassion while respecting the community's verification process.

Stage 4 of 4

Respond and Remember

Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.

How This Should Shape Us

Why these applications follow
Text

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

Meaning in context

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

What remains true

Jesus restores a stigmatized man through willing compassion while respecting the community's verification process.

What faithful practice follows?

Treat people with visible conditions as full participants, combine compassion with consent and health safeguards, and reject stigma.

A Concrete Example

A group asks a participant what accommodation and contact feel safe while following current medical guidance.

Teach It Back

Explain Mark 1:40-45 in your own words. Include its place in Mark's movement, the decisive action or saying, one source-controlled uncertainty, and one use the unit does not authorize.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go Deeper

The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Mark 1:40-45

Narrative and structural evidence

Mark 1:40-45 opens with “And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him…” and closes with “But he went out, and began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the matter, insomuch that….” The internal movement runs from “A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness” to “then must remain outside as the public report spreads.”

Mark 1:40-45

Interpretive limit or uncertainty

KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

moved with compassion

Many manuscripts describe compassion in verse 41, while an important alternative reads anger; the variant affects the emotional portrait but not the cleansing.

How certain? probable
What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

Galilee, Judea, Jerusalem, and Roman rule

Mark narrates Jesus and Jewish contemporaries within first-century Galilean, Judean, temple, village, household, synagogue, and Roman-imperial settings. For Mark 1:40-45, the needed reconstruction is bounded by: KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

How certain? probable
Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

KJV wording in 1:40-45

The pinned KJV remains displayed. SBLGNT, STEP, and NET comparison clarify older English, syntax, and material alternatives where this unit requires them: KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

How certain? probable
Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Israel's Scriptures and Jewish life

Mark 1:40-45 belongs inside Jewish Scripture, worship, purity, Sabbath, kingdom, temple, Passover, prophetic hope, and debate as locally relevant. Christian interpretation must preserve that first horizon and reject antisemitic or supersessionist caricature.

How certain? strong
How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

Synoptic and canonical relationships

Mark's own wording and sequence control Mark 1:40-45. Matthew and Luke often reuse or reshape Mark under the widely supported Markan-priority model, while Matthean-priority and other models remain alternatives; parallels may clarify reception but cannot overwrite Mark.

How certain? probable
Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

Text and transmission

Mark's textual history is checked against the SBLGNT and NET notes. The material local control is: KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

How certain? probable
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters differ?

Best judgment: KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

How certain? probable
Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

God's kingdom, Jesus' identity and authority, Passion-shaped service, faithful following, accountable power, mercy, resurrection hope, and care for vulnerable people control the theological use of Mark 1:40-45.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

How certain? strong
Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

The cleansing does not authorize stigma toward people with Hansen's disease or visible conditions.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 7 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 1:40-45 as the complete unit, preserve KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

What truth can remain

The cleansing does not authorize stigma toward people with Hansen's disease or visible conditions.

The command to silence does not justify concealing abuse or public danger.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 7 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 1:40-45 as the complete unit, preserve KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

What truth can remain

The command to silence does not justify concealing abuse or public danger.

Touch in this story does not override consent or infection precautions.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 7 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A man with a serious skin condition appeals to Jesus' willingness; Jesus touches and cleanses him, orders priestly verification, and then must remain outside as the public report spreads.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 1:40-45 as the complete unit, preserve KJV 'leper' covers a range of ancient skin conditions and ritual status, not a modern diagnosis. Manuscripts differ between compassion and anger in 1:41. The Levitical procedure is honored rather than mocked.

What truth can remain

Touch in this story does not override consent or infection precautions.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.

Mark 1:40-45, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.

Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 1:40-45

STEP Bible Data

Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.

STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 1:40-45

NET Bible — Mark with translators' and textual notes

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.

NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 1:40-45 and attached translator/textual notes

Mark, Second Edition

Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.

Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 15–30, Mark 1.21–3.7a; subsection covering 1:40-45

Mark course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world

Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.

Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 1:40-45

Mark

Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.

McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 1:40-45

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.

Exact location: Mark 1:40-45, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open source ↗

Greek textual evidence

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos

Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010

Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.

Exact location: Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 1:40-45

Open the Mark Greek text file ↗

Lexical and grammatical evidence

STEP Bible Data

Tyndale House Cambridge

Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026

Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.

Exact location: STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 1:40-45

Open source ↗

Translation and textual notes

NET Bible — Mark with translators' and textual notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.

Exact location: NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 1:40-45 and attached translator/textual notes

Open the official NET Mark PDF ↗

modern scholarly narrative commentary

Mark, Second Edition

Edwin K. Broadhead

Sheffield Phoenix Press; distributed online by the Society of Biblical Literature, 2009

Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.

Exact location: Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 15–30, Mark 1.21–3.7a; subsection covering 1:40-45

Open Broadhead's complete Mark commentary ↗

modern scholarly book introduction

Mark course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world

Paul S. Berge; revised by Kristofer Phan Coffman

Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2023 revision; current online course inspected 2026

Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.

Exact location: Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 1:40-45

Open the Enter the Bible Mark course ↗

modern open confessional commentary

Mark

Mike McKinley

The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023 online edition

Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.

Exact location: McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 1:40-45

Open McKinley's Mark commentary ↗