Section 31 of 777:24-30Mark
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Mark 10:45, Mk 10:45, or Mr 10:45.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Read the passage and its setting

Mark 7:24-30, King James Version

King James VersionMark 7:24-30

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Mark 7:24-30

A Syrophoenician Mother Presses the Bread Metaphor

The Main Point

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

What Is Happening Here?

Mark 7:24-30 opens with “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an…” and closes with “And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid….”

Context That Shapes This Passage

How does this passage relate?

Mark 7:24-30

In “A Syrophoenician Mother Presses the Bread Metaphor,” the complete unit develops this passage-specific claim: A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

Why this relationship fits: The reviewed reasoning path begins, “A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter” and concludes, “after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.”

What earlier material does it rely on?

Mark 7:1-23

Immediately after redefining what defiles, Jesus enters Gentile territory and meets a foreign mother whose answer presses the Israel-first bread metaphor toward inclusion.

Why this relationship fits: Mark 7:1-23 closes with “All these evil things come from within, and defile the man”; Mark 7:24-30 opens with “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon….”

Where does this sit in the whole book?

Mark as a whole

Mark 7:24-30 belongs to the bread-and-boundaries movement where mission widens and the disciples' incomplete perception becomes explicit. Its contribution is: A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

Why this relationship fits: Mark 7:24-30 opens with “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an…” and closes with “And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid….” The reviewed movement runs from “A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter” to “after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.” The unit's reviewed main point is: A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

Stage 2 of 4

Follow Mark's Narrative Movement

See why this section appears here and how the author's narrative movement leads to its meaning.

Why Is This Passage Here?

Immediately after redefining what defiles, Jesus enters Gentile territory and meets a foreign mother whose answer presses the Israel-first bread metaphor toward inclusion.

Follow the Scene

  1. A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter

  2. after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

Why This Interpretation Fits

Narrative and structural evidence

Mark 7:24-30 opens with “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an…” and closes with “And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid….” The internal movement runs from “A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter” to “after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.”

Interpretive limit or uncertainty

The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

Stage 3 of 4

Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries

Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.

Words That Matter

household dogs

κυνάρια · kynaria

household dogs

What the Passage Is Not Saying

Reading Mark 7:24-30 in its complete Markan, Jewish, first-century, and Passion-shaped setting rules out these uses:

The dog image does not authorize ethnic slurs, racism, misogyny, or humiliating petitioners.

Jesus' initial refusal does not license leaders to test vulnerable people through cruelty.

The woman's persistence does not require survivors to endure abuse to receive help.

Context check: A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

What Remains True Today

A Gentile mother's courageous reply presses an Israel-first mission toward mercy for her daughter.

Stage 4 of 4

Respond and Remember

Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.

How This Should Shape Us

Why these applications follow
Text

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

Meaning in context

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

What remains true

A Gentile mother's courageous reply presses an Israel-first mission toward mercy for her daughter.

What faithful practice follows?

Hear marginalized petitioners as reasoning agents, reject demeaning tests, and let truthful challenge expose unnecessarily narrow access to care.

A Concrete Example

A service director listens when an excluded mother identifies a policy's harm and changes the rule instead of demanding more humiliation.

Teach It Back

Explain Mark 7:24-30 in your own words. Include its place in Mark's movement, the decisive action or saying, one source-controlled uncertainty, and one use the unit does not authorize.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go Deeper

The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Mark 7:24-30

Narrative and structural evidence

Mark 7:24-30 opens with “And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre and Sidon, and entered into an…” and closes with “And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone out, and her daughter laid….” The internal movement runs from “A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter” to “after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.”

Mark 7:24-30

Interpretive limit or uncertainty

The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

household dogs

The diminutive still carries a demeaning comparison within the children-and-bread metaphor that the woman answers.

How certain? probable
What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

Galilee, Judea, Jerusalem, and Roman rule

Mark narrates Jesus and Jewish contemporaries within first-century Galilean, Judean, temple, village, household, synagogue, and Roman-imperial settings. For Mark 7:24-30, the needed reconstruction is bounded by: The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

How certain? probable
Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

KJV wording in 7:24-30

The pinned KJV remains displayed. SBLGNT, STEP, and NET comparison clarify older English, syntax, and material alternatives where this unit requires them: The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

How certain? probable
Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Israel's Scriptures and Jewish life

Mark 7:24-30 belongs inside Jewish Scripture, worship, purity, Sabbath, kingdom, temple, Passover, prophetic hope, and debate as locally relevant. Christian interpretation must preserve that first horizon and reject antisemitic or supersessionist caricature.

How certain? strong
How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

Synoptic and canonical relationships

Mark's own wording and sequence control Mark 7:24-30. Matthew and Luke often reuse or reshape Mark under the widely supported Markan-priority model, while Matthean-priority and other models remain alternatives; parallels may clarify reception but cannot overwrite Mark.

How certain? probable
Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

Text and transmission

Mark's textual history is checked against the SBLGNT and NET notes. The material local control is: The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

How certain? probable
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters differ?

Best judgment: The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

How certain? probable
Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

God's kingdom, Jesus' identity and authority, Passion-shaped service, faithful following, accountable power, mercy, resurrection hope, and care for vulnerable people control the theological use of Mark 7:24-30.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

How certain? strong
Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

The dog image does not authorize ethnic slurs, racism, misogyny, or humiliating petitioners.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 31 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 7:24-30 as the complete unit, preserve The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

What truth can remain

The dog image does not authorize ethnic slurs, racism, misogyny, or humiliating petitioners.

Jesus' initial refusal does not license leaders to test vulnerable people through cruelty.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 31 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 7:24-30 as the complete unit, preserve The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

What truth can remain

Jesus' initial refusal does not license leaders to test vulnerable people through cruelty.

The woman's persistence does not require survivors to endure abuse to receive help.

Why it is attractive

A memorable line or action in movement 31 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.

What context changes

A Gentile woman asks Jesus to release her daughter; after a harsh children-and-dogs saying, she answers within the metaphor and Jesus grants the request because of her word.

A stronger reading

Read Mark 7:24-30 as the complete unit, preserve The saying reflects an Israel-first mission and uses demeaning household-dog language. Interpreters differ on test, insult, parable, and mission-boundary readings; the woman's agency and successful reply must remain visible.

What truth can remain

The woman's persistence does not require survivors to endure abuse to receive help.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.

Mark 7:24-30, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.

Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 7:24-30

STEP Bible Data

Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.

STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 7:24-30

NET Bible — Mark with translators' and textual notes

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.

NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 7:24-30 and attached translator/textual notes

Mark, Second Edition

Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.

Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 55–73, Mark 6.6b–8.27a; subsection covering 7:24-30

Mark course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world

Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.

Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 7:24-30

Mark

Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.

McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 7:24-30

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.

Exact location: Mark 7:24-30, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open source ↗

Greek textual evidence

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos

Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010

Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.

Exact location: Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 7:24-30

Open the Mark Greek text file ↗

Lexical and grammatical evidence

STEP Bible Data

Tyndale House Cambridge

Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026

Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.

Exact location: STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 7:24-30

Open source ↗

Translation and textual notes

NET Bible — Mark with translators' and textual notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition

Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.

Exact location: NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 7:24-30 and attached translator/textual notes

Open the official NET Mark PDF ↗

modern scholarly narrative commentary

Mark, Second Edition

Edwin K. Broadhead

Sheffield Phoenix Press; distributed online by the Society of Biblical Literature, 2009

Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.

Exact location: Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 55–73, Mark 6.6b–8.27a; subsection covering 7:24-30

Open Broadhead's complete Mark commentary ↗

modern scholarly book introduction

Mark course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world

Paul S. Berge; revised by Kristofer Phan Coffman

Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2023 revision; current online course inspected 2026

Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.

Exact location: Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 7:24-30

Open the Enter the Bible Mark course ↗

modern open confessional commentary

Mark

Mike McKinley

The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023 online edition

Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.

Exact location: McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 7:24-30

Open McKinley's Mark commentary ↗