Section 18 of 1475:1–4Numbers
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Numbers 6:24, Num 6:24, or Nu 6:24.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Numbers 5:1–4, King James Version

King James VersionNumbers 5:1–4

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Numbers 5:1–4

Three Ritual Conditions Require Temporary Removal

Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

Numbers 5:1–4 opens with “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,” and closes with “And the children of Israel did so, and put them out without the camp: as the LORD spake….”

How the passage moves

  1. Three ritual-status categories are named.

  2. The command protects the sanctuary-centered camp and is performed.

A phrase that matters

unclean / jealous zeal

טָמֵא / קִנְאָה · tame / qinah

In 5:1-4, this wording keeps the unit's own claim and limit together: Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

How this should shape us

How should this shape us today?

Use precise nonstigmatizing language, qualified medical care, consent-based safeguards, time-bounded restrictions when genuinely necessary, and independent protection for anyone subject to another person's accusation. Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

Teach it back

Explain Numbers 5:1–4 in your own words. Include its place in Numbers' movement from Sinai to Moab, both movements within this thought unit, one material uncertainty, one affected person or group, and one use the complete context rules out.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Numbers 5:1–4

Literary movement

Three ritual-status categories are named. The command protects the sanctuary-centered camp and is performed.

Numbers 5:1–4

Contextual judgment

Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command. Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

unclean / jealous zeal

Ritual status and a husband's jealousy are different categories; neither supplies a modern diagnosis or proof of guilt.

How certain? probable
What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

Covenantal rhetoric, law, and historical setting

Impurity, exclusion from camp zones, corpse contact, cleansing water, bodily conditions, jealousy ordeal, and restoration belong to an ancient sanctuary-status system. Ritual status is not identical to sin, infection, diagnosis, dirt, or worth. For this unit, reconstruction remains bounded by the received movement: Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

How certain? probable
Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

KJV wording and material alternatives

The pinned KJV wording of 5:1-4 is read with the complete Masoretic record and NET translator notes. A material chapter expression is “unclean / jealous zeal” (tame / qinah): Ritual status and a husband's jealousy are different categories; neither supplies a modern diagnosis or proof of guilt.

How certain? probable
Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Numbers within Torah and Jewish Scripture

Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Psalms, prophets, and later Jewish Scripture are compared where they frame, retell, or receive this unit. Final-form relationships remain primary; compositional, chronological, and historical alternatives are stated rather than harmonized away.

How certain? strong
How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

Canonical relationships after the first horizon

Leviticus supplies the fuller purity map; Numbers applies it to camp, Passover, death, and legal cases. Later Jewish law and practice interpret these texts through living traditions, and later Christian uses must not caricature them.

How certain? probable
Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

Textual witnesses and reconstruction limits

The pinned KJV remains the displayed text. The reviewed Masoretic record and NET notes disclose material wording, number, name, syntax, and witness questions where present; no variant is silently substituted and textual silence is not converted into certainty.

How certain? probable
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters disagree?

Best judgment: Interpreters debate ritual logic, compositional history, actual practice, gendered power, symbolic meaning, medical analogies, and later reception. No source permits a modern diagnosis or a claim that the vulnerable person deserved exclusion. For “Three Ritual Conditions Require Temporary Removal,” confidence is strongest in the received unit's stated sequence and literary function; source, date, demography, geography, mechanism, archaeology, and historical reconstruction remain probable, plausible, or uncertain as the evidence warrants.

How certain? probable
Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

The sanctuary order treats death and bodily life as materially significant while providing named routes of restoration; the system's asymmetries and coercive cases remain ethically visible. This unit contributes that claim without making its severe action, unequal institution, or narrator-approved judgment ethically easy: Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

Across Numbers this unit contributes to the movement from Sinai's ordered camp through wilderness crisis and generational death toward Moab, succession, worship, land, and justice: Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

How certain? strong
Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

Why it is attractive

A vivid command, blessing, curse, land claim, penalty, speech, or poetic line can feel easier to transfer than the complete covenant case and its affected people.

What context changes

Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

A stronger reading

Communities must distinguish ritual language, medical evidence, moral responsibility, privacy, consent, and equal dignity instead of turning bodily difference into blame. This unit also keeps the following boundary explicit: Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

What truth can remain

Three ritual-status categories are named. The command protects the sanctuary-centered camp and is performed.

This unit does not turn Israel's camp, priesthood, purity system, vow, war, land, penalty, census, or leadership arrangement into a direct constitution for a modern state, church, family, or military.

Why it is attractive

A vivid command, blessing, curse, land claim, penalty, speech, or poetic line can feel easier to transfer than the complete covenant case and its affected people.

What context changes

Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

A stronger reading

Communities must distinguish ritual language, medical evidence, moral responsibility, privacy, consent, and equal dignity instead of turning bodily difference into blame. This unit also keeps the following boundary explicit: Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

What truth can remain

Three ritual-status categories are named. The command protects the sanctuary-centered camp and is performed.

This passage must not be used for antisemitism, supersessionism, ethnic stigma, nationalism, genocide, conquest, misogyny, abuse, coercive obedience, date-setting, prosperity guarantees, or cruelty toward vulnerable people.

Why it is attractive

A vivid command, blessing, curse, land claim, penalty, speech, or poetic line can feel easier to transfer than the complete covenant case and its affected people.

What context changes

Israel must send people with tzaraat, discharges, or corpse impurity outside the camp so the camp surrounding the divine dwelling is not defiled; the people carry out the command.

A stronger reading

Communities must distinguish ritual language, medical evidence, moral responsibility, privacy, consent, and equal dignity instead of turning bodily difference into blame. This unit also keeps the following boundary explicit: Ritual exclusion does not authorize stigma, quarantine without medical evidence, disability discrimination, abandonment, or calling bodily conditions sin.

What truth can remain

Three ritual-status categories are named. The command protects the sanctuary-centered camp and is performed.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage for this thought unit.

Numbers 5:1–4, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Numbers

Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, names, numbers, speeches, poems, legal clauses, older-English controls, and translation limits.

Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Num.xml, Masoretic words and morphology for 5:1–4

NET Bible: Numbers with translators' notes

Supports: Unit-bounded translation, syntax, lexical, ritual, legal, number, name, poetic, and selected textual notes; silence is not evidence.

NET Bible Numbers PDF, complete 134-page PDF, translation and translator notes attached to 5:1–4

Numbers Part 1

Supports: Final-form movement, wilderness setting, census and camp, complaint, leadership, composition, and ethical framing.

Yale Bible Study, Numbers Part 1, complete study guide sections “Introduction,” “At Sinai (1:1–10:10),” “From Sinai to Moab (10:11–22:1),” and “Composition,” applied to Numbers 5:1–4

The Sotah Ritual: Permitting a Jealous Husband to Remain with His Wife

Supports: Ancient ordeal procedure, possible social function, coercion, bodily threat, and limits on modern transfer.

TheTorah, “The Sotah Ritual: Permitting a Jealous Husband to Remain with His Wife,” complete sections on suspicion, priestly procedure, curse, dust-water, outcome, later reception, and gendered risk, applied to Numbers 5:1–4

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage for this thought unit.

Exact location: Numbers 5:1–4, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus

Open source ↗

hebrew text and morphology

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Numbers

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible Project

Open Scriptures, release 2.2, 2021

Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, names, numbers, speeches, poems, legal clauses, older-English controls, and translation limits.

Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Num.xml, Masoretic words and morphology for 5:1–4

Open source ↗

translation and translator notes

NET Bible: Numbers with translators' notes

Biblical Studies Press

eBible.org distribution of the NET Bible, source files dated 2026-08-08

Supports: Unit-bounded translation, syntax, lexical, ritual, legal, number, name, poetic, and selected textual notes; silence is not evidence.

Exact location: NET Bible Numbers PDF, complete 134-page PDF, translation and translator notes attached to 5:1–4

Open source ↗

modern critical open study guide

Numbers Part 1

Yale Bible Study

Yale Divinity School, 2023 course edition

Supports: Final-form movement, wilderness setting, census and camp, complaint, leadership, composition, and ethical framing.

Exact location: Yale Bible Study, Numbers Part 1, complete study guide sections “Introduction,” “At Sinai (1:1–10:10),” “From Sinai to Moab (10:11–22:1),” and “Composition,” applied to Numbers 5:1–4

Open source ↗

modern jewish scholarly open legal and literary study

The Sotah Ritual: Permitting a Jealous Husband to Remain with His Wife

Hanna Liss

TheTorah.com, 2019

Supports: Ancient ordeal procedure, possible social function, coercion, bodily threat, and limits on modern transfer.

Exact location: TheTorah, “The Sotah Ritual: Permitting a Jealous Husband to Remain with His Wife,” complete sections on suspicion, priestly procedure, curse, dust-water, outcome, later reception, and gendered risk, applied to Numbers 5:1–4

Open source ↗