Verse Lens · Expanded explanation
Proverbs 11:1 Explained in Context
Use this verse as a doorway into the larger passage—not as an isolated saying.
Verse 1. 1A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.
King James Version — public domain in the United States · Bible text and permissions
Quick Meaning
This verse uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”.
Read It With
- Proverbs 11:1–3
Proverbs 11:1–3 is the required frame for Proverbs 11:1. Here the saying uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”; its collection setting controls whether the words describe a pattern, warning, invitation, or bounded command.
Why This Verse Appears Here
This verse uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”. This contributes necessary evidence to “Truthful testimony, honest measures, and integrity — A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just...,” where truthful testimony, honest measures, and integrity, reverent accountability before the LORD, humility, teachability, pride, and reputation are read together without erasing the sentence saying's own force.
Follow the Context
- Opening (11:1): the unit uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”.
- Development (11:1–3): adjacent lines test truthful testimony, honest measures, and integrity, reverent accountability before the LORD, humility, teachability, pride, and reputation through parallelism, contrast, motive, image, or consequence.
- Close (11:3): the unit uses contrastive parallelism to place “The integrity of the upright shall guide them” against “the perverseness of transgressors shall destroy them”, creating the next supported pause.
Phrase-by-Phrase Explanation
“A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight...”
In plain language: reverent accountability before the LORD
This verse uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”.
Why it matters: This wording carries interpretive, pastoral, or misuse risk requiring the full unit and explicit limits.
How certain? strongWhat This Verse Is Not Saying
The saying does not transfer divine authority to a parent, pastor, ruler, spouse, nation, or political movement, and it does not authorize fear-based coercion.
What Remains True
Wisdom begins with reverent accountability to the LORD and refuses to make human insight self-sufficient. In Proverbs 11:1, that bounded truth is expressed through “A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight...,” not through a promise detached from its literary form.
How It Can Shape Life
- Bring the decision under truthful worship, moral accountability, and correction rather than using religious language to shield preference or power. For Proverbs 11:1, preserve the sequence: verse role (uses contrastive parallelism to place “A false balance is abomination to the LORD” against “a just weight is his delight”) -> contextual meaning in Proverbs 11:1–3 -> proportionate truth -> this accountable response.
Teach It Back
Explain Proverbs 11:1's exact role in Proverbs 11:1–3. Distinguish pattern from guarantee, include “A false balance is abomination to the...,” name one uncertainty, and explicitly reject one harmful use.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Continue in Context
The full thought-unit study remains the final contextual authority for this Verse Lens.
Read Proverbs 11:1–3 — Truthful testimony, honest measures, and integrity — A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just...Sources used for this Verse Lens
How certain is this explanation? probable
Where care is needed
This sentence saying states a context-shaped moral pattern. Its small-cluster boundary and degree of generality remain reviewable; exceptional outcomes do not make the observation meaningless or turn it into a guarantee.
These are the sources used directly for this lens. Language, grammar, disagreements, and the complete source shelf remain attached to the full thought-unit research record.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact displayed KJV words, canonical order, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and complete unit coverage.
Exact location: Proverbs 11:1–3, repository-pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM-derived corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Proverbs
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording and morphology used only for the exact unit's lexical, grammatical, parallel, superscription, number-saying, and acrostic questions.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Prov.xml, OSIS 11:1-11:3
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Proverbs with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-attached textual, lexical, grammatical, syntactic, parallelism, and older-English controls for the exact range.
Exact location: NET Bible Proverbs PDF, printed pp. 1107-1111, exact tc/tn/sn entries attached to 11:1–3
Open source ↗modern critical commentary
Proverbs
K. T. Aitken
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, 2001
Supports: Whole-book and collection orientation, local commentary, social-setting proposals, and named interpretation limits.
Exact location: Aitken, ‘Proverbs,’ Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 405-422, subsection covering 11:1–3 and the First Solomonic sentence-saying collection outline
Open source ↗scholarly monograph chapter abstract and metadata
Context in the Sayings Collections
Stuart Weeks
Oxford University Press, in Early Israelite Wisdom, 2000
Supports: Abstract-level control for the dispute over individual-saying, small-cluster, and collection context; no uninspected detailed claim.
Exact location: Weeks, ‘Context in the Sayings Collections,’ Early Israelite Wisdom (2000), official abstract and chapter pp. 20-40; methodological question applied to Proverbs 11:1–3
Open source ↗