Read the passage and its setting
Song of Solomon 7:11-13, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Song of Solomon 7:11-13
Her Invitation to the Fields and Vineyards
The Main Point
The woman invites the beloved into field, village, and vineyard, names when and where she will give her love, and presents fragrant fruit she has kept for him.
What Is Happening Here?
The speaker is active about place, timing, inspection, gift, and stored abundance; her initiative is neither a universal duty nor transferable permission.
What Came Before—and What Comes Next?
The preceding wasf ended with the woman's claim that she belongs to her beloved and his desire is toward her.
She wishes public kissing could occur without contempt and imagines leading the beloved to her mother's house.
Follow the Song's Movement
See why this section appears here and how the author's lyric leads to its meaning.
Why Is This Passage Here?
The lyric answers the man's stated desire with the woman's own concrete invitation and conditions, strengthening the collection's portrayal of mutual agency.
Follow the Lyric Movement
She asks the beloved to go out with her.
She proposes lodging in villages or among henna plants.
She chooses early vineyard inspection as the next movement.
There, she says, she will give her loves.
Mandrakes and stored fruits close the invitation with scent and abundance.
What Is the Author Saying?
Why This Interpretation Fits
Initiative
The woman supplies the imperatives, destinations, time, and promised gift.
Vineyard return
Vineyards now become a place she chooses, contrasting the imposed vineyard labor of 1:6.
Stored gift
New and old fruits laid up for the beloved emphasize intention and preparation, not obligation.
Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries
Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.
Words That Matter
come, my beloved
לְכָה דוֹדִי · lekhah dodi
A direct invitation from the woman to the beloved.
there will I give thee my loves
שָׁם אֶתֵּן אֶת דֹּדַי · sham etten et dodai
She names place and gift in first-person speech.
mandrakes
דּוּדָאִים · duda'im
Fragrant plants associated elsewhere with fertility, though this poem does not state a pregnancy aim.
What the Passage Is Not Saying
Reading Song of Solomon 7:11-13 as lyric poetry inside the complete Song rules out these coercive or reductive uses:
Her invitation does not create consent for any other time, place, act, or person.
The mandrakes do not make fertility or childbirth the purpose of every sexual relationship.
Giving love is not a marital duty enforceable by pressure, religion, or violence.
Context check: The woman actively chooses a setting and says where she will give love, presenting erotic generosity as her own speech and action.
What Remains True Today
Intimate giving belongs to the giver; place, timing, and participation remain specific rather than assumed.
Respond and Remember
Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.
How This Should Shape Us
Why these applications follow
The woman invites the beloved into field, village, and vineyard, names when and where she will give her love, and presents fragrant fruit she has kept for him.
The woman actively chooses a setting and says where she will give love, presenting erotic generosity as her own speech and action.
Intimate giving belongs to the giver; place, timing, and participation remain specific rather than assumed.
How should this shape us today?
Ask rather than infer, and treat each invitation as bounded to what the person actually says; no role or prior promise cancels the ability to stop.
A Concrete Example
In practice, read the invitation, refusal, praise, fear, or longing aloud as the speaker's poetic act; then ask what respect, honesty, mutuality, and safety require before making a modern analogy.
Teach It Back
Explain Song of Solomon 7:11-13 in your own words. Include its lyric movement, one material uncertainty, and one coercive or reductive use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go Deeper
The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.
Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Initiative
The woman supplies the imperatives, destinations, time, and promised gift.
Vineyard return
Vineyards now become a place she chooses, contrasting the imposed vineyard labor of 1:6.
Stored gift
New and old fruits laid up for the beloved emphasize intention and preparation, not obligation.
Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps
come, my beloved
A direct invitation from the woman to the beloved.
How certain? probablethere will I give thee my loves
She names place and gift in first-person speech.
How certain? probablemandrakes
Fragrant plants associated elsewhere with fertility, though this poem does not state a pregnancy aim.
How certain? probableWhat the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture
Ancient lyric world and limits of reconstruction
The poem evokes ancient gardens, vineyards, households, cities, trade, animals, aromatics, royalty, and kinship, but it does not supply enough evidence to reconstruct one event, couple, wedding, or social setting with certainty.
How certain? probableWhy translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices
KJV wording and material alternatives
KJV 'lodge in the villages' may also be read among henna plants. 'My loves' is sexually strong but remains the speaker's promised gift, not a contract others can claim.
How certain? probableEarlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas
The Song within Israel's Scriptures
The unit belongs first to the Song's own lyric world. Other biblical texts may illuminate shared imagery only after this poem's voice, desire, and literary movement have been heard on their own terms.
How certain? strongHow this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary
Responsible canonical and reception connections
Within the Hebrew and Christian canons, this lyric may contribute to reflection on embodied love, but later canonical analogies cannot erase its human voices or make every image a code.
How certain? probableTextual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning
Textual, grammatical, and poetic care
No single textual or grammatical proposal should control the poem without the Masoretic wording, poetic context, and responsible translation alternatives being shown.
How certain? probableWhere careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Villages versus henna, the literal or erotic force of vineyard inspection, and mandrake symbolism remain open. Her initiative and promised gift are clear.
How certain? probableTheology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section
Theological contribution
The canon makes room for poetry that treats embodied desire, beauty, longing, delight, absence, and love's danger seriously without turning them into a rulebook.
How certain? strongTheological contribution
This unit contributes to the Song's lyric exploration of embodied desire, voice, mutual delight, absence, risk, and freedom: The woman invites the beloved into field, village, and vineyard, names when and where she will give her love, and presents fragrant fruit she has kept for him.
How certain? strongCommon ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading
Her invitation does not create consent for any other time, place, act, or person.
A vivid erotic image can be detached from voice, poetic form, and the person's agency.
The woman actively chooses a setting and says where she will give love, presenting erotic generosity as her own speech and action.
Intimate giving belongs to the giver; place, timing, and participation remain specific rather than assumed.
Her invitation does not create consent for any other time, place, act, or person.
The mandrakes do not make fertility or childbirth the purpose of every sexual relationship.
Readers may turn an ancient social arrangement or metaphor into a timeless demand.
The woman actively chooses a setting and says where she will give love, presenting erotic generosity as her own speech and action.
Intimate giving belongs to the giver; place, timing, and participation remain specific rather than assumed.
The mandrakes do not make fertility or childbirth the purpose of every sexual relationship.
Giving love is not a marital duty enforceable by pressure, religion, or violence.
A later allegory, gender script, or relationship ideal can feel simpler than the poem's uncertainty.
The woman actively chooses a setting and says where she will give love, presenting erotic generosity as her own speech and action.
Intimate giving belongs to the giver; place, timing, and participation remain specific rather than assumed.
Giving love is not a marital duty enforceable by pressure, religion, or violence.
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Song of Solomon 7:11-13, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, speaker-gender signals, wordplay, poetic clauses, and translation questions.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Song.xml, 7:11-13
Supports: Verse-level textual, grammatical, literary, historical, and translation alternatives.
NET Bible Song of Songs PDF, printed pp. 1256-1257, translation and notes on 7:11-13
Supports: Genre, voice, unit boundaries, anthology and unity questions, garden and body imagery, and Jewish and Christian reception.
Brenner, 'The Song of Solomon,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 429-433, unit division and commentary relevant to 7:11-13
Supports: Sensory metaphor, wasf, mutual desire, garden imagery, and the limits of literalizing erotic poetry.
Van der Merwe, 'The erotic power of metaphor,' HTS 73.3 (2017), pp. 1-9, especially pp. 4-7; applied to 7:11-13
Supports: Female voice and initiative, mutuality, family and social constraints, and critical alternatives to idealized equality.
Ndoga and Viviers, 'Is the woman in the Song of Songs really free?', HTS 56.4 (2000), pp. 1286-1307, especially pp. 1293-1304; applied to 7:11-13
Supports: Women's movement, city space, watchmen, social vulnerability, maternal space, and the limits of the Song's counterworld.
Erzberger, 'Public space in the Song of Songs,' OTE 24.2 (2011), pp. 346-362, especially pp. 352-357; applied to 7:11-13
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: Song of Solomon 7:11-13, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Song of Songs
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording, morphology, speaker-gender signals, wordplay, poetic clauses, and translation questions.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Song.xml, 7:11-13
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: The Song of Songs with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2006
Supports: Verse-level textual, grammatical, literary, historical, and translation alternatives.
Exact location: NET Bible Song of Songs PDF, printed pp. 1256-1257, translation and notes on 7:11-13
Open source ↗modern critical commentary
The Song of Solomon
Athalya Brenner
Oxford University Press, in The Oxford Bible Commentary, 2001
Supports: Genre, voice, unit boundaries, anthology and unity questions, garden and body imagery, and Jewish and Christian reception.
Exact location: Brenner, 'The Song of Solomon,' Oxford Bible Commentary, printed pp. 429-433, unit division and commentary relevant to 7:11-13
Open source ↗peer reviewed journal article
Erotic fantasy, spirituality and Song of Songs
Dirk G. van der Merwe
Verbum et Ecclesia 38.2, 2017
Supports: Sensory metaphor, wasf, mutual desire, garden imagery, and the limits of literalizing erotic poetry.
Exact location: Van der Merwe, 'The erotic power of metaphor,' HTS 73.3 (2017), pp. 1-9, especially pp. 4-7; applied to 7:11-13
Open source ↗peer reviewed journal article
Is the woman in the Song of Songs really that free?
S. S. Ndoga and H. Viviers
HTS Teologiese Studies 56.4, 2000
Supports: Female voice and initiative, mutuality, family and social constraints, and critical alternatives to idealized equality.
Exact location: Ndoga and Viviers, 'Is the woman in the Song of Songs really free?', HTS 56.4 (2000), pp. 1286-1307, especially pp. 1293-1304; applied to 7:11-13
Open source ↗peer reviewed journal article
I Sought Him, But Found Him Not (Song 5:6): Public Space in the Song of Songs
Johanna Erzberger
Old Testament Essays 24.2, 2011
Supports: Women's movement, city space, watchmen, social vulnerability, maternal space, and the limits of the Song's counterworld.
Exact location: Erzberger, 'Public space in the Song of Songs,' OTE 24.2 (2011), pp. 346-362, especially pp. 352-357; applied to 7:11-13
Open source ↗