Verse Lens · Expanded explanation
Titus 1:13 Explained in Context
Use this verse as a doorway into the larger passage—not as an isolated saying.
Verse 13. 13This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
King James Version — public domain in the United States · Bible text and permissions
Quick Meaning
The testimony is affirmed and sharp rebuke is ordered with the stated restorative aim that those addressed become healthy in faith.
Read It With
- Titus 1:10–16
Read Titus 1:10–16 as a complete movement. Trace the reason for leadership, observable household harm, the Cretan stereotype, the restorative aim of rebuke, and the works test as one polemical movement.
Why This Verse Appears Here
The author affirms the testimony and immediately supplies both the sharp method and the health-restoring goal of correction.
Read Titus 1:10–14 together
Why these verses belong together: The opponents, household harm, profit motive, Cretan quotation, restorative rebuke, and diversion from truth form one polemical sequence.
Verse 10. 10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
Verse 11. 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake.
Verse 12. 12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
Verse 13. 13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
Verse 14. 14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Follow the Context
- The opponents are described as insubordinate, empty-talking deceivers who damage households for shameful gain.
- A proverb about Cretans is quoted and affirmed as a reason for sharp rebuke whose stated goal is healthy faith rather than destruction.
- The argument turns from purity slogans to the teachers' corrupted mind, conscience, disobedience, and failure in good work.
What This Verse Is Not Saying
This verse does not authorize humiliating, violent, prejudicial, or procedurally unfair rebuke.
What Remains True
Even sharp correction is textually directed toward restored health in faith rather than humiliation or destruction.
How It Can Shape Life
- Choose the least coercive correction capable of protecting people and state the evidence, process, and restorative goal.
Teach It Back
Explain Titus 1:13's exact contribution to Titus 1:10–16. Include the argument transition, one source-grounded issue or limitation, the enduring truth, and what this verse does not authorize.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Continue in Context
The full thought-unit study remains the final contextual authority for this Verse Lens.
Read Titus 1:10–16 — Disruptive Teaching Is Exposed without Turning Polemic into PrejudiceSources used for this Verse Lens
How certain is this explanation? probable
Where care is needed
The immediate object of 'rebuke them' may be the opponents, Cretan hearers influenced by them, or both.
These are the sources used directly for this lens. Language, grammar, disagreements, and the complete source shelf remain attached to the full thought-unit research record.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact KJV wording and immediate English context for Titus 1:10–16.
Exact location: eBible/CrossWire eng-kjv2006 USFM, source files dated 2026-08-19, Titus 1:10–16; archive and normalized-corpus SHA-256 values are recorded in the library policy.
Open source ↗Greek textual evidence
The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition
Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos
Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010
Supports: Critically edited Greek wording, connectives, grammar, and lexical forms.
Exact location: Official SBLGNT repository, data/sblgnt/text/Titus.txt, Titus 1:10–16.
Open the Titus Greek text file ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — Titus with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, digital edition accessed 2026
Supports: Material translation choices, syntax, and textual variants at the cited verses.
Exact location: NET Bible, Titus 1, translator, study, and textual notes attached to verses 10–16.
Open NET Titus 1 ↗public domain critical commentary
A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles
Walter Lock
T&T Clark, International Critical Commentary, 1924
Supports: Public-domain verse-level philology and older interpretive options checked against primary evidence and newer work.
Exact location: Walter Lock, Pastoral Epistles, ICC, Titus commentary, print pp. 133–139.
Open source ↗modern critical open access monograph chapter
Lying Cretans, chapter 7 of Ethnic Stereotypes and the Letters of Paul
Matthijs den Dulk
Cambridge University Press, 2026
Supports: Critical evidence that the Cretan line functions as an ethnic stereotype and has enabled harmful reception.
Exact location: Matthijs den Dulk, ‘Lying Cretans,’ Ethnic Stereotypes and the Letters of Paul (2026), print pp. 176–209, especially pp. 176–186 for literary context and stereotype analysis and pp. 187–209 for interpretive reception.
Open source ↗peer reviewed social historical study
Roman Crete and the Letter to Titus
George M. Wieland
New Testament Studies 55.3, 2009
Supports: A bounded social-historical proposal for Roman Crete, household order, and public witness.
Exact location: George M. Wieland, ‘Roman Crete and the Letter to Titus,’ NTS 55.3 (2009), pp. 338–354, with pp. 348–354 for religious, missional, and public-context proposals.
Open source ↗peer reviewed research overview
The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship: A Critical Overview
Aldred A. Genade
Currents in Biblical Research 9.1, 2010
Supports: Research-history check that keeps Titus distinct and maps major structural, historical, and theological alternatives.
Exact location: Aldred A. Genade, ‘The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship,’ Currents in Biblical Research 9.1 (2010), pp. 48–62, with the unit-specific authorship, structure, occasion, or theology discussion checked.
Open source ↗