Section 8 of 93:8–11Titus
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Titus 2:11–14, or Tit 2:11–14.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Titus 3:8–11, King James Version

King James VersionTitus 3:8–11

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Titus 3:8–11

Insist on Profitable Good and Refuse Vain, Faction-Making Conflict

A trustworthy saying must be insisted on as profitable good, not as a fight

The saying is trustworthy, and Titus is to insist on these things so that those who have believed in God may be careful to devote themselves to good works. These things are excellent and profitable for people. Then the letter draws a hard line: avoid foolish controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, because they are unprofitable and worthless. After a first and second warning, have nothing to do with a person who is factious, knowing that such a one is warped and sinful, self-condemned. The insist-and-avoid pairing is the pastoral method. Belief is supposed to become careful, useful good. Speculative law-fights and pedigree contests are not.

The person in view is someone who keeps making a faction after two clear warnings. This is not a warrant to freeze out the annoying, the doubting, or the person who asked a hard question once. It is not a tool for a leader to punish dissent from himself. The standard is whether the conflict is vain, law-centered, and community-splitting, and whether the person has already been warned twice. Even here the aim of the letter remains profitable good for people. Cutting someone off to win a room is the same spirit the unit refuses.

How this should shape us

Put your energy into a good work that actually helps someone, and walk away from the genealogy-style argument that only ranks people. If a person in your church or group keeps splitting the room after two honest warnings, stop giving them the microphone. Do not confuse that sober limit with a license to be cruel.

Teach it back

Explain Titus 3:8–11 in your own words. Include its place in Titus, two textual observations, one major alternative or limitation, and one conclusion the passage does not permit.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful interpreters disagree?

Best judgment: Interpreters disagree whether the faithful saying is specifically 3:4–7, the larger 3:1–7 section, or a traditional formula now embedded in the paragraph. They also differ on how the factional-person instruction maps onto church discipline. The immediate grammar supports a persistent division-making pattern after two warnings, not an automatic penalty for one mistaken sentence.

How certain? probable
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact KJV wording and immediate English context for Titus 3:8–11.

eBible/CrossWire eng-kjv2006 USFM, source files dated 2026-08-19, Titus 3:8–11; archive and normalized-corpus SHA-256 values are recorded in the library policy.

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Supports: Critically edited Greek wording, connectives, grammar, and lexical forms.

Official SBLGNT repository, data/sblgnt/text/Titus.txt, Titus 3:8–11.

NET Bible — Titus with translators' notes

Supports: Material translation choices, syntax, and textual variants at the cited verses.

NET Bible, Titus 3, translator, study, and textual notes attached to verses 8–11.

A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles

Supports: Public-domain verse-level philology and older interpretive options checked against primary evidence and newer work.

Walter Lock, Pastoral Epistles, ICC, Titus commentary, print pp. 155–157.

STEP Bible Data

Supports: Morphology and lexical-range cross-check for reader-facing original-language notes.

STEP Bible Data repository, TAGNT and Greek lexical records for Titus 3:8–11.

Grace in Action: Exploring the Intersection of Soteriology and Ethics in the Letter to Titus

Supports: Close theological analysis connecting appearing grace, ethical training, mercy, renewal, and good works.

Gustaf W. Henriksson, ‘Grace in Action,’ SJT 73.4 (2020), pp. 333–339 on Titus 2:11–14, 3:4–8, divine gift, human agency, and good works.

The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship: A Critical Overview

Supports: Research-history check that keeps Titus distinct and maps major structural, historical, and theological alternatives.

Aldred A. Genade, ‘The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship,’ Currents in Biblical Research 9.1 (2010), pp. 48–62, with the unit-specific authorship, structure, occasion, or theology discussion checked.

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact KJV wording and immediate English context for Titus 3:8–11.

Exact location: eBible/CrossWire eng-kjv2006 USFM, source files dated 2026-08-19, Titus 3:8–11; archive and normalized-corpus SHA-256 values are recorded in the library policy.

Open source ↗

Greek textual evidence

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos

Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010

Supports: Critically edited Greek wording, connectives, grammar, and lexical forms.

Exact location: Official SBLGNT repository, data/sblgnt/text/Titus.txt, Titus 3:8–11.

Open the Titus Greek text file ↗

Translation and textual notes

NET Bible — Titus with translators' notes

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, digital edition accessed 2026

Supports: Material translation choices, syntax, and textual variants at the cited verses.

Exact location: NET Bible, Titus 3, translator, study, and textual notes attached to verses 8–11.

Open NET Titus 3 ↗

public domain critical commentary

A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Pastoral Epistles

Walter Lock

T&T Clark, International Critical Commentary, 1924

Supports: Public-domain verse-level philology and older interpretive options checked against primary evidence and newer work.

Exact location: Walter Lock, Pastoral Epistles, ICC, Titus commentary, print pp. 155–157.

Open source ↗

Lexical and grammatical evidence

STEP Bible Data

Tyndale House Cambridge

Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026

Supports: Morphology and lexical-range cross-check for reader-facing original-language notes.

Exact location: STEP Bible Data repository, TAGNT and Greek lexical records for Titus 3:8–11.

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open access theological study

Grace in Action: Exploring the Intersection of Soteriology and Ethics in the Letter to Titus

Gustaf W. Henriksson

Scottish Journal of Theology 73.4, 2020; published online 2021

Supports: Close theological analysis connecting appearing grace, ethical training, mercy, renewal, and good works.

Exact location: Gustaf W. Henriksson, ‘Grace in Action,’ SJT 73.4 (2020), pp. 333–339 on Titus 2:11–14, 3:4–8, divine gift, human agency, and good works.

Open source ↗

peer reviewed research overview

The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship: A Critical Overview

Aldred A. Genade

Currents in Biblical Research 9.1, 2010

Supports: Research-history check that keeps Titus distinct and maps major structural, historical, and theological alternatives.

Exact location: Aldred A. Genade, ‘The Letter to Titus in Recent Scholarship,’ Currents in Biblical Research 9.1 (2010), pp. 48–62, with the unit-specific authorship, structure, occasion, or theology discussion checked.

Open source ↗