Section 55 of 14214:4–14:151 Samuel
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try 1 Samuel 12:24, First Samuel 12:24, or 1 Sam 12:24.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

1 Samuel 14:4–14:15, King James Version

King James Version1 Samuel 14:4–14:15

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

1 Samuel 14:4–14:15

Jonathan's climb triggers terror in the garrison

Two rocks, a taunt used as a sign, and a climb on hands and feet

Between the passages by which Jonathan seeks to go over, there is a sharp rock on one side and a sharp rock on the other: Bozez and Seneh, one northward over against Michmash, the other southward over against Gibeah. Jonathan says, come, let us go over unto the garrison of these uncircumcised: it may be that the LORD will work for us, for there is no restraint to the LORD to save by many or by few. His armour-bearer answers, do all that is in thine heart; I am with thee.

'Save by many or by few' confesses divine freedom. It is not a promise that every small force will win. If the garrison says tarry, they will stay; if it says come up, they will go up, taking that taunt as the sign that the LORD has delivered them. Testing God with a dare is not licensed as a method.

About twenty fall, and terror runs through camp and earth

The men of the garrison say, behold, the Hebrews come forth out of the holes where they had hid themselves. They call, come up to us, and we will shew you a thing. Jonathan climbs up upon his hands and upon his feet, and his armour-bearer after him. They fall before Jonathan; the armour-bearer slays after him. The first slaughter is about twenty men, within as it were an half acre of land. There is trembling in the host, in the field, and among all the people; the garrison and the spoilers tremble, and the earth quakes: so it is a very great trembling.

The sign and earthquake-like terror are narrated as divine action. They supply no repeatable military or spiritual technique. The victory does not authorize reckless testing, slurs, two-person violence, or claims that faith guarantees triumph against larger forces.

How this should shape us

Do not copy a two-man raid as a faith experiment. Honor help that arrives without turning 'by few' into a slogan, and refuse taunts and slurs as a way of reading God's will.

Teach it back

Explain 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15 in your own words, including its movement, one source-controlled detail, one uncertainty, one affected person, and one misuse the context rules out.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go deeper

The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.

Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Where do careful readers disagree?

Best judgment: The sign and earthquake-like terror are narrated as divine action but supply no repeatable military or spiritual technique.

How certain? probable
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact displayed KJV words, verse order, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete unit coverage.

1 Samuel 14:4–14:15, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM-derived repository corpus

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: 1 Samuel

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording and morphology, with the two KJV-Hebrew versification shifts stated rather than silently offset.

Open Scriptures MorphHB v2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/1Sam.xml, OSIS 14:4–14:15; KJV 20:42 spans Hebrew 20:42–21:1, KJV 21:1–15 maps to Hebrew 21:2–16, KJV 23:29 maps to Hebrew 24:1, and KJV 24:1–22 maps to Hebrew 24:2–23

NET Bible First Edition Notes: 1 Samuel

Supports: Only the translator notes actually printed for these verses, used for lexical, grammatical, textual, historical, and older-English controls.

NET Bible First Edition Notes, 1 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 504–543, exact tc/tn/sn entries attached to 14:4–14:15

The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as a Historiographical Source

Supports: One relatively early integrated/two-edition account of composition, structure, and historiographic value, retained as a contested model.

Garsiel, JHS 10.5 (2010), pp. 1–42, named structural or composition discussion covering the movement that includes 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15

The Theology of the Book of Samuel

Supports: Only the publisher-visible book architecture and theological scope; the paywalled body is not treated as inspected.

Goldingay, The Theology of the Book of Samuel (2024), official frontmatter and TOC: 1 Samuel 13:1–20:42[21:1], pp. 77–110

Divine Violence in the Book of Samuel

Supports: One literary, ethical, and political account of divine and human violence; publisher-visible scope does not establish consensus.

Gilmour, Divine Violence in the Book of Samuel (2021/2022), official abstract and TOC: relevant discussion for 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15, including 1 Samuel 12 pp. 71–81, Saul's rejection pp. 90–139, Eli's house pp. 140–150, or ark violence pp. 154–185 as applicable

The Biblical Herem

Supports: Philology and historical comparison for the ban, used without normalizing violence or proving dependence.

Stern, The Biblical Herem (open digital edition, 2020), philology pp. 5–18, ancient comparisons pp. 19–88, Samuel–Kings and 1 Samuel 15 pp. 165–188, conclusion pp. 217–226

Species and Ethnicity in 1 Samuel 15

Supports: One intersectional reading of constructed and unstable ethnicity; modern categories are not treated as exact ancient identities.

Millar, 'Species and Ethnicity in 1 Samuel 15,' Bible and Critical Theory 19.1–2 (2023), pp. 1–22, especially pp. 1–4

Rethinking Amalek in This 21st Century

Supports: Reception and ethical evidence about dangerous modern Amalek mappings, never historical identification or permission for violence.

Jacobs, 'Rethinking Amalek in This 21st Century,' Religions 8.9 (2017), article 196, numbered sections and paragraphs

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact displayed KJV words, verse order, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete unit coverage.

Exact location: 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM-derived repository corpus

Open source ↗

hebrew text and morphology

Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: 1 Samuel

Open Scriptures

Open Scriptures, release 2.2

Supports: Masoretic Hebrew wording and morphology, with the two KJV-Hebrew versification shifts stated rather than silently offset.

Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/1Sam.xml, OSIS 14:4–14:15; KJV 20:42 spans Hebrew 20:42–21:1, KJV 21:1–15 maps to Hebrew 21:2–16, KJV 23:29 maps to Hebrew 24:1, and KJV 24:1–22 maps to Hebrew 24:2–23

Open source ↗

translation and translator notes

NET Bible First Edition Notes: 1 Samuel

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2006

Supports: Only the translator notes actually printed for these verses, used for lexical, grammatical, textual, historical, and older-English controls.

Exact location: NET Bible First Edition Notes, 1 Samuel PDF, printed pp. 504–543, exact tc/tn/sn entries attached to 14:4–14:15

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open access scholarly article

The Book of Samuel: Its Composition, Structure and Significance as a Historiographical Source

Moshe Garsiel

The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 10.5, 2010

Supports: One relatively early integrated/two-edition account of composition, structure, and historiographic value, retained as a contested model.

Exact location: Garsiel, JHS 10.5 (2010), pp. 1–42, named structural or composition discussion covering the movement that includes 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15

Open source ↗

scholarly monograph frontmatter and table of contents

The Theology of the Book of Samuel

John Goldingay

Cambridge University Press, 2024

Supports: Only the publisher-visible book architecture and theological scope; the paywalled body is not treated as inspected.

Exact location: Goldingay, The Theology of the Book of Samuel (2024), official frontmatter and TOC: 1 Samuel 13:1–20:42[21:1], pp. 77–110

Open source ↗

scholarly monograph abstract and contents

Divine Violence in the Book of Samuel

Rachelle Gilmour

Oxford University Press, 2021 online; 2022 print

Supports: One literary, ethical, and political account of divine and human violence; publisher-visible scope does not establish consensus.

Exact location: Gilmour, Divine Violence in the Book of Samuel (2021/2022), official abstract and TOC: relevant discussion for 1 Samuel 14:4–14:15, including 1 Samuel 12 pp. 71–81, Saul's rejection pp. 90–139, Eli's house pp. 140–150, or ark violence pp. 154–185 as applicable

Open source ↗

open access scholarly monograph

The Biblical Herem

Philip D. Stern

Brown Judaic Studies, 2020 digital edition

Supports: Philology and historical comparison for the ban, used without normalizing violence or proving dependence.

Exact location: Stern, The Biblical Herem (open digital edition, 2020), philology pp. 5–18, ancient comparisons pp. 19–88, Samuel–Kings and 1 Samuel 15 pp. 165–188, conclusion pp. 217–226

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open access scholarly article

Species and Ethnicity in 1 Samuel 15

Suzanna Millar

Bible and Critical Theory 19.1-2, 2023

Supports: One intersectional reading of constructed and unstable ethnicity; modern categories are not treated as exact ancient identities.

Exact location: Millar, 'Species and Ethnicity in 1 Samuel 15,' Bible and Critical Theory 19.1–2 (2023), pp. 1–22, especially pp. 1–4

Open source ↗

peer reviewed open access reception and ethics article

Rethinking Amalek in This 21st Century

Steven Leonard Jacobs

Religions 8.9, article 196, 2017

Supports: Reception and ethical evidence about dangerous modern Amalek mappings, never historical identification or permission for violence.

Exact location: Jacobs, 'Rethinking Amalek in This 21st Century,' Religions 8.9 (2017), article 196, numbered sections and paragraphs

Open source ↗