Jump to a verse
2 Peter 1:16–21, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
2 Peter 1:16–21
Majesty Witness and Prophetic Word Ground the Coming
Majesty seen, prophecy attended — still no calendar
The proclaimed power and coming of Jesus are denied to be cleverly made myths. The counter-claim is eyewitness: they saw his majesty and heard the Father's voice on the holy mountain, 'This is my beloved Son.' That remembered disclosure grounds hope in his coming. It does not provide a date or a sequence chart.
The prophetic word is a lamp in a dark place until day dawns. Prophecy did not arise from someone's private unloosing; people spoke from God as they were carried by the Holy Spirit. 'Private interpretation' does not forbid ordinary reading, and it does not hand one teacher a monopoly. Authorship questions about the eyewitness 'we' remain real. They do not make the letter useless: hope is tied to public witness and Spirit-borne Scripture, not to a fabricated story or a countdown.
How this should shape us
When a teacher needs a secret timeline, a hidden code, or a story that only works if you distrust every ordinary witness, walk away. Read a hard passage with at least one other honest person. If an interpretation only works when you are alone, angry, or uniquely 'carried,' it is probably your own unloosing, not the Spirit's.
Teach it back
Explain 2 Peter 1:16–21 in your own words. Include its place in 2 Peter's movement, the unit's logic, one material uncertainty, and one use the context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Major questions include the authorship implications of the eyewitness plural, how the transfiguration relates to the coming, whether prophecy is 'more sure' than sight or confirmed by it, and whether 1:20 concerns a prophet's origin, explanation, or readers' interpretation. The preferred reading gives verse 21 governing weight: prophecy was not generated by autonomous human will.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
2 Peter 1:16–21, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Greek wording, clause relationships, repeated terms, and the base text used for original-language discussion.
SBLGNT official text file 2Pet.txt, 1:16–21
Supports: Verse-level Greek, syntax, KJV-era wording, textual variants, and interpretive alternatives.
NET Bible 2 Peter PDF, 1:16–21 translation and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Supports: Historical-critical orientation, genre, authorship and date alternatives, audience limits, whole-letter movement, and theological themes.
Enter the Bible 2 Peter course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, and Theological Themes; applied to 2 Peter 1:16–21
Supports: Pro-Petrine authorship case, literary flow, Greek observations, theological synthesis, and verse-level interpretation.
Harmon and Sloat, 2 Peter, section 1:16–21, with Author and Recipients, Theology, Purpose, outline, bibliography, and endnotes
Supports: Transfiguration, coming, eyewitness claim, honor language, prophetic word, and major translation options in 1:19–20.
Reese, 'Commentary on 2 Peter 1:16–21,' sections Knowing What's True; Glory, Majesty, and Honor; The Prophetic Word; Conclusion
Supports: Authorship and date case, letter structure, transfiguration, 2 Peter 3, textual variants, stoicheia alternatives, destruction and continuity, ethics, and ecological hermeneutics.
Neville, JSNT 47.3 (2025), pp. 478–481 and 487–492
Supports: Independent morphology, form, and lexical-range cross-check for material Greek claims.
STEP Bible Data repository, Greek morphology and lexical records for 2 Peter 1:16–21
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing Scripture wording, paragraph markers, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage.
Exact location: 2 Peter 1:16–21, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗Greek textual evidence
The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition
Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos
Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010
Supports: Greek wording, clause relationships, repeated terms, and the base text used for original-language discussion.
Exact location: SBLGNT official text file 2Pet.txt, 1:16–21
Open the 2 Peter Greek text file ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — 2 Peter with translators' and textual notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition
Supports: Verse-level Greek, syntax, KJV-era wording, textual variants, and interpretive alternatives.
Exact location: NET Bible 2 Peter PDF, 1:16–21 translation and attached translator, study, and textual notes
Open the official NET 2 Peter PDF ↗modern scholarly book introduction
2 Peter course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, and theological themes
David Stewart; revised by Matthew L. Skinner
Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2023 revision
Supports: Historical-critical orientation, genre, authorship and date alternatives, audience limits, whole-letter movement, and theological themes.
Exact location: Enter the Bible 2 Peter course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, and Theological Themes; applied to 2 Peter 1:16–21
Open source ↗modern open commentary
2 Peter
Matthew Harmon and John Sloat
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023
Supports: Pro-Petrine authorship case, literary flow, Greek observations, theological synthesis, and verse-level interpretation.
Exact location: Harmon and Sloat, 2 Peter, section 1:16–21, with Author and Recipients, Theology, Purpose, outline, bibliography, and endnotes
Open source ↗modern scholarly pastoral commentary
Commentary on 2 Peter 1:16–21: A foretaste of the second coming
Ruth Anne Reese
Working Preacher, Luther Seminary, 2026
Supports: Transfiguration, coming, eyewitness claim, honor language, prophetic word, and major translation options in 1:19–20.
Exact location: Reese, 'Commentary on 2 Peter 1:16–21,' sections Knowing What's True; Glory, Majesty, and Honor; The Prophetic Word; Conclusion
Open source ↗peer reviewed open access article
On Behalf of Creation: Reading the Destructive Cosmic Eschatology of 2 Peter 3 in the Light of the Transfiguration
David J. Neville
Journal for the Study of the New Testament 47.3, 2025
Supports: Authorship and date case, letter structure, transfiguration, 2 Peter 3, textual variants, stoicheia alternatives, destruction and continuity, ethics, and ecological hermeneutics.
Exact location: Neville, JSNT 47.3 (2025), pp. 478–481 and 487–492
Open source ↗Lexical and grammatical evidence
STEP Bible Data
Tyndale House Cambridge
Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026
Supports: Independent morphology, form, and lexical-range cross-check for material Greek claims.
Exact location: STEP Bible Data repository, Greek morphology and lexical records for 2 Peter 1:16–21
Open source ↗