Section 10 of 1303:1–3:10Acts
All sections
Jump to a verse
Open a verse without taking it out of context.

Try Acts 1:8, Acts of the Apostles 1:8, or The Acts 1:8.

Choose book, chapter, and verse

Read the passage and its setting

Acts 3:1–3:10, King James Version

King James VersionActs 3:1–3:10

Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.

Acts 3:1–3:10

A disabled man is healed at the temple gate

The Main Point

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

What Is Happening Here?

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

What Came Before—and What Comes Next?

What came before

Acts 2:42–2:47 has just shown that The baptized community persists in apostolic teaching, fellowship, meals, prayers, wonders, shared resources, temple worship, household meals, praise, public favor, and daily growth.

What comes next

Acts 3:11–3:16 will show that As the healed man holds Peter and John, Peter denies that their own power or holiness caused the healing and attributes it to the glorified servant Jesus and faith in his name.

Stage 2 of 4

Follow the Witness from Jerusalem to Rome

See why this section appears here and how the author's witness movement leads to its meaning.

Why Is This Passage Here?

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. Here Acts advances the Jerusalem-to-Rome horizon while retaining the people and unresolved questions created by the prior scene.

Follow the Scene or Speech

  1. Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

  2. The unit distinguishes narrated event, participant speech, the narrator's framing, material uncertainty, and the ethical boundary: The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

What Is the Author Saying?

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

Why This Interpretation Fits

Unit movement

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

Narrator and speech control

The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

Material limit

The narrative identifies an extraordinary healing and the man's public recognition; it does not explain why others remain unhealed or provide a technique for reproducing the event.

Stage 3 of 4

Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries

Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.

Words That Matter

refreshing

See SBLGNT and STEP data for the exact inflected form · anapsyxis

A KJV rendering for relief or renewal in Peter's restoration appeal, not a promise of constant comfort.

What the Passage Is Not Saying

Reading Acts 3:1–3:10 within Luke-Acts and the complete thought unit rules out this use:

The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

Context check: Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

What Remains True Today

Faithful witness preserves the unit's narrated sequence, speaker and narrator distinction, Jewish and Gentile identities, affected people, and material uncertainty. The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

Stage 4 of 4

Respond and Remember

Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.

How This Should Shape Us

Why these applications follow
Text

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

Meaning in context

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

What remains true

Faithful witness preserves the unit's narrated sequence, speaker and narrator distinction, Jewish and Gentile identities, affected people, and material uncertainty. The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

What accountable response follows?

First identify the verse role and speaker within Acts 3:1–3:10; then state the contextual meaning—Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. Preserve the proportionate truth that witness remains accountable to context, evidence, and affected people; finally apply this safeguard: The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

A Concrete Example

When Acts 3:1–3:10 is cited today, name the speaker, authority, people affected, evidence, and uncertainty before proposing an analogy; then test the proposed action against this boundary: The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

Teach It Back

Explain Acts 3:1–3:10 in your own words, naming its movement, speaker or narrator role, one source-controlled detail, one uncertainty, one affected person, and one conclusion the passage does not authorize.

Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.

Go Deeper

The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.

Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Acts 3:1–3:10

Narrative or speech movement

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

Acts 3:1–3:10

Interpretive control

The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

Acts 3:1–3:10

Ethical boundary

The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps

refreshing

A KJV rendering for relief or renewal in Peter's restoration appeal, not a promise of constant comfort.

How certain? probable
What the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture

Setting and recoverable limits

The narrative identifies an extraordinary healing and the man's public recognition; it does not explain why others remain unhealed or provide a technique for reproducing the event. Geography, chronology, social practice, Roman procedure, and institutional reconstruction are claimed only to the degree supported by the cited sources.

How certain? probable
Why translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices

Pinned KJV and Greek control

The pinned KJV remains the displayed text. SBLGNT, STEP morphology, and the NET notes were checked for Acts 3:1–3:10; older KJV wording is explained only where it materially affects understanding.

How certain? strong
Earlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas

Israel's Scriptures and Jewish setting

Acts continues Israel's scriptural story through Jewish witnesses, synagogues, temple worship, Torah practice, diaspora communities, and contested interpretations. Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

How certain? strong
How this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary

Luke-Acts and responsible canonical reading

Luke's first volume is the immediate literary horizon. Later canonical connections must preserve Acts 3:1–3:10's own sequence, Jewish setting, speakers, and unresolved questions.

How certain? strong
Textual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning

The inspected SBLGNT, NET notes, and where relevant Codex Bezae do not expose a variant that changes this unit's central movement; The narrative identifies an extraordinary healing and the man's public recognition; it does not explain why others remain unhealed or provide a technique for reproducing the event.

Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties

Which judgment needs visible uncertainty?

Best judgment: The narrative identifies an extraordinary healing and the man's public recognition; it does not explain why others remain unhealed or provide a technique for reproducing the event.

How certain? probable
Theology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section

Theological contribution

Acts joins divine initiative, the Spirit, human witness, communal discernment, and accountable action in this movement: Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

How certain? strong

Theological contribution

God's action in Acts 3:1–3:10 is narrated as particular gift, judgment, guidance, or preservation; it is not a technique readers can control or a warrant for the misuse explicitly rejected here.

How certain? strong
Common ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading

The scene does not blame disabled people, oppose medicine, promise healing on demand, or permit unverified miracle stories and fundraising pressure.

Why it is attractive

A vivid event or line in Acts 3:1–3:10 can be detached from its narrator, speaker, first audience, ancient institutions, literary placement, and later Acts parallels.

What context changes

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God. The account must be read as a complete scene: human motive, claimed divine action, institutional power, and narrator evaluation are related but not interchangeable.

A stronger reading

Keep description distinct from command, actor interpretation distinct from authorial evaluation, and original setting distinct from faithful application.

What truth can remain

Peter and John meet a man disabled from birth who asks for alms; Peter gives healing in Jesus' name, raises him, and the man enters the temple walking, leaping, and praising God.

Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

Supports: Exact displayed KJV wording, order, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and unit coverage.

Acts 3:1–3:10, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM-derived repository corpus

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Supports: Greek wording and punctuation control, without pretending one edition is a complete apparatus.

SBLGNT official text, Acts 3:1-3:10

STEP Bible Data

Supports: Morphology and lexical cross-check for words explicitly discussed in this unit.

STEP Bible Data, TAGNT rows for Acts 3:1-3:10

NET Bible First Edition Notes: Acts

Supports: Verse-attached textual, translation, language, geography, chronology, and historical notes actually printed for the unit.

NET Bible First Edition Acts PDF, printed pp. 2104-2205, exact tn/tc/sn entries attached to 3:1–3:10

Acts of the Apostles Course and Study Guides

Supports: Introductory critical orientation to the unit's place in Luke-Acts, with contested judgments retained as interpretations.

Yale Bible Study Acts course, course unit 'The Church Begins in Jerusalem,' Acts 1-4 study guide

The Acts of the Apostles

Supports: One complete confessional commentary reading, independently checked against the text and critical controls.

Thompson, online Acts commentary, heading and paragraphs explicitly covering Acts 3:1–3:10

The Jewishness of Luke-Acts: How Recent Scholarship Has Challenged the View that Luke-Acts Is Pro-Gentile and Anti-Jewish

Supports: Abstract-supported control for Jewish continuity and Gentile inclusion in Acts 3:1–3:10, not a settlement of every conflict scene.

Smith, JTS 72.2 (2021), pp. 738-765, official abstract and bibliographic record

Sources for This Section

These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.

Biblical text

King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006

eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society

USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.

Supports: Exact displayed KJV wording, order, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and unit coverage.

Exact location: Acts 3:1–3:10, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM-derived repository corpus

Open source ↗

Greek textual evidence

The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition

Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos

Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010

Supports: Greek wording and punctuation control, without pretending one edition is a complete apparatus.

Exact location: SBLGNT official text, Acts 3:1-3:10

Open the Acts Greek text file ↗

Lexical and grammatical evidence

STEP Bible Data

Tyndale House Cambridge

Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026

Supports: Morphology and lexical cross-check for words explicitly discussed in this unit.

Exact location: STEP Bible Data, TAGNT rows for Acts 3:1-3:10

Open source ↗

open translation and translator notes

NET Bible First Edition Notes: Acts

Biblical Studies Press

Biblical Studies Press, 2006

Supports: Verse-attached textual, translation, language, geography, chronology, and historical notes actually printed for the unit.

Exact location: NET Bible First Edition Acts PDF, printed pp. 2104-2205, exact tn/tc/sn entries attached to 3:1–3:10

Open source ↗

open university bible study course

Acts of the Apostles Course and Study Guides

Yale Divinity School faculty

Yale Bible Study, 2019

Supports: Introductory critical orientation to the unit's place in Luke-Acts, with contested judgments retained as interpretations.

Exact location: Yale Bible Study Acts course, course unit 'The Church Begins in Jerusalem,' Acts 1-4 study guide

Open source ↗

open confessional commentary

The Acts of the Apostles

Alan J. Thompson

The Gospel Coalition, 2023

Supports: One complete confessional commentary reading, independently checked against the text and critical controls.

Exact location: Thompson, online Acts commentary, heading and paragraphs explicitly covering Acts 3:1–3:10

Open source ↗

peer reviewed article abstract and metadata

The Jewishness of Luke-Acts: How Recent Scholarship Has Challenged the View that Luke-Acts Is Pro-Gentile and Anti-Jewish

Joshua Paul Smith

The Journal of Theological Studies 72.2, 2021

Supports: Abstract-supported control for Jewish continuity and Gentile inclusion in Acts 3:1–3:10, not a settlement of every conflict scene.

Exact location: Smith, JTS 72.2 (2021), pp. 738-765, official abstract and bibliographic record

Open source ↗