Deuteronomy 17:2–7, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Apostasy Charges Require Multiple Witnesses
The charge is other worship, named as covenant evil
The case is a man or a woman in one of Israel's gates who does evil in the LORD's sight by going after other gods, sun, moon, or host of heaven. The offense is public covenant breach by worship, not a private opinion poll.
Israel is told to inquire, make search, and ask diligently. Only if the thing is true and certain does the ancient capital sentence follow. Accusation is not proof.
Witnesses must be plural, and they strike first
Two or three witnesses are required. One witness shall not rise up against anyone to cause death. The witnesses' hands are to be first against the condemned, then the hands of all the people.
The procedure tries to keep secret rumor and lone hostility from becoming a killing. It does not make stoning, religious execution, or crowd violence a present duty. The due-process limit sits inside a lethal ancient penalty; it does not authorize repeating that penalty.
How this should shape us
Treat a religious accusation as unproven until independent witnesses and diligent inquiry exist. Do not execute, exile, or disable people for worship or conscience, and do not let a single accuser end a life or a livelihood.
Teach it back
Explain Deuteronomy 17:2–7 in your own words. Include its place in Moses' speeches or the final narrative, both movements, one material uncertainty, one affected person or group, and one use the complete context rules out.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters disagree?
Best judgment: Interpreters disagree about the composition, date, Mosaic presentation, final-form role, legal relationship, rhetoric, history, and reception of “Apostasy Charges Require Multiple Witnesses.” Confidence is strongest in the received unit's movement summarized here; historical and source-critical reconstructions remain probable, plausible, or uncertain as the evidence warrants.
How certain? probableResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage for this thought unit.
Deuteronomy 17:2–7, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, names, speech and legal clauses, poetic lines, older-English controls, and translation limits.
Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Deut.xml, Masoretic words and morphology for 17:2–7
Supports: Unit-bounded translation, syntax, lexical, legal, poetic, measure, name, and selected textual notes; silence is not evidence.
NET Bible Deuteronomy PDF, complete PDF pp. 1–111, translation and translator notes attached to 17:2–7
Supports: Concise critical framing of Deuteronomy's law collection, historical setting, relationship to other Torah laws, centralization, and moral tensions.
Yale Bible Study, 'Deuteronomy Part 1,' complete two-page PDF and linked lesson sections on law, legal collections, reform, centralization, and ethics, applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Supports: A current debate map only; no unexposed chapter argument is attributed.
Schmid, Oxford Handbook chapter (2020), official abstract and six-question scope: Pentateuchal setting, reworked Tetrateuch, layers, date, covenant and treaty, and Deuteronomism
Supports: Mosaic speech presentation, self-referential Torah language, final-form function, and one model of earlier independent literary life.
Glatt-Gilad, 'Deuteronomy: The First Torah,' complete article sections on speeches, Torah self-reference, law differences, and Joshua-Kings reception; applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Supports: One Jewish ethical model for retaining difficult law, naming an ancient concern, following rabbinic restriction, and refusing the penalty today.
Farber, 'Can We Pass Moral Judgment on Torah?' complete sections on Deuteronomy 21:18–21, ancient parental power, Sanhedrin 71a, moral purpose, and rejection of present execution; applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact reader-facing KJV wording, paragraph metadata, supplied-word markup, and complete verse coverage for this thought unit.
Exact location: Deuteronomy 17:2–7, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗hebrew text and morphology
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible: Deuteronomy
Open Scriptures
Open Scriptures, release 2.2
Supports: Hebrew wording, morphology, names, speech and legal clauses, poetic lines, older-English controls, and translation limits.
Exact location: Open Scriptures MorphHB v.2.2, commit 6a5db284c715c18b239422e57bb89684e6a19f00, wlc/Deut.xml, Masoretic words and morphology for 17:2–7
Open source ↗translation and translator notes
NET Bible: Deuteronomy with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
eBible.org distribution of the NET Bible, PDF generated 2026-08-12
Supports: Unit-bounded translation, syntax, lexical, legal, poetic, measure, name, and selected textual notes; silence is not evidence.
Exact location: NET Bible Deuteronomy PDF, complete PDF pp. 1–111, translation and translator notes attached to 17:2–7
Open source ↗modern critical open study guide
Deuteronomy Part 1: Law, Reform, and Historical Setting
Joel S. Baden and Yale Bible Study
Yale Divinity School, 2023 course edition
Supports: Concise critical framing of Deuteronomy's law collection, historical setting, relationship to other Torah laws, centralization, and moral tensions.
Exact location: Yale Bible Study, 'Deuteronomy Part 1,' complete two-page PDF and linked lesson sections on law, legal collections, reform, centralization, and ethics, applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Open source ↗modern scholarly handbook chapter abstract
The Place of Deuteronomy in the Formation of the Pentateuch
Konrad Schmid
The Oxford Handbook of the Pentateuch, Oxford University Press, 2020
Supports: A current debate map only; no unexposed chapter argument is attributed.
Exact location: Schmid, Oxford Handbook chapter (2020), official abstract and six-question scope: Pentateuchal setting, reworked Tetrateuch, layers, date, covenant and treaty, and Deuteronomism
Open source ↗modern jewish scholarly open composition study
Deuteronomy: The First Torah
David A. Glatt-Gilad
TheTorah.com, 2015
Supports: Mosaic speech presentation, self-referential Torah language, final-form function, and one model of earlier independent literary life.
Exact location: Glatt-Gilad, 'Deuteronomy: The First Torah,' complete article sections on speeches, Torah self-reference, law differences, and Joshua-Kings reception; applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Open source ↗modern jewish scholarly open ethics and reception study
Can We Pass Moral Judgment on Torah?
Zev Farber
TheTorah.com, 2022
Supports: One Jewish ethical model for retaining difficult law, naming an ancient concern, following rabbinic restriction, and refusing the penalty today.
Exact location: Farber, 'Can We Pass Moral Judgment on Torah?' complete sections on Deuteronomy 21:18–21, ancient parental power, Sanhedrin 71a, moral purpose, and rejection of present execution; applied to Deuteronomy 17:2–7
Open source ↗