Genesis 7:1–24, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Genesis 7:1–24
The Flood Covers the Earth
Entry, water, and what is wiped away
God calls Noah's household and representatives of living creatures into the ark. They enter as commanded. The LORD shuts Noah in. Then the announced waters come: the great deep bursts, the heavens open, rain falls forty days, and the waters prevail.
The repetitions are not padding. They slow the story so judgment and preservation are both seen. Breathing land life outside is wiped away. Those inside remain. The unit ends with 150 days of dominating water, not with a children's adventure.
What the numbers do not settle
Clean and unclean animal numbers, forty days of rain, and 150 days of prevailing water belong to the received story. They do not by themselves settle modern geology, or prove that every member of Noah's household was righteous, or make one compositional reconstruction the only meaning of the chapter.
How this should shape us
Take entrenched violence seriously enough to protect life. Respond to real warning with concrete care for people and creatures, and keep confidence proportional to what the text actually narrates.
Teach it back
Explain how Genesis 7:1–24 moves from the command to enter the ark to the waters prevailing for 150 days. Include what the extra clean animals contribute, why forty and 150 days should be distinguished without being carelessly added, and one modern question the passage does not settle by itself.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go deeper
The explanation above is meant to stand on its own. Open these notes only if you want language, history, disagreements, or source locations.
Where careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Does 'seven, seven' mean seven animals or seven pairs?
Best judgment:
How certain? strongHow do the two-of-each and extra-clean-animal instructions relate?
Best judgment:
How certain? strongHow do forty days and 150 days relate?
Best judgment:
How certain? strongWhat physical scope does the flood language claim?
Best judgment:
How certain? strongResearch trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Reader-facing Scripture wording, verse numbering, paragraph data, and supplied-word markup.
Pinned eBible/CrossWire standardized 1769 KJV corpus, Genesis 7:1–24
Supports: Righteousness, clean and unclean terms, repeated numerals, wipe-away language, deep and floodgates, entry formulas, prevail language, breath of life, dry land, survival, and 150 days.
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 7:1–24
Supports: Prominent 'you,' seven or seven pairs, male-and-mate wording, seven days, forty days, paired entry, deep and heaven imagery, prevail language, fifteen cubits, breath of life, survival, and 150 days.
NET Bible, Genesis 7:1–24 translator notes 1–39
Supports: Final-form movement through ark entry, flood judgment, preservation, de-creation, and covenantal hope.
Genesis commentary, section Genesis 6:9–9:17, especially Genesis 7 entry, flood, death, and preservation
Supports: Animal-number, water-source, entry, chronology, vocabulary, and divine-name doublets; influential Priestly and non-Priestly reconstruction; de-creation pattern.
Genesis 6–9:17: The Flood study guide, sections 'The Problem with the Flood Narrative' and 'Two Flood Stories'
Supports: Mesopotamian vessel, flood, mountain, bird, and sacrifice parallels and Genesis's distinctive violence, blessing, and covenant theology.
The Flood Story in Its Ancient Near Eastern Context, sections 'Noah and Utnapishtim,' 'Noah and Atrahasis,' and 'The Relationship Between the Human and the Divine'
Supports: Modern reconstruction of P and non-P flood traditions and proposed Mesopotamian precursors, used only at the documented level.
The Formation of Genesis 1–11, chapter 6, pp. 141–177; official Oxford abstract and chapter outline
Supports: Current review of source divisions, competing harmonizations, final-form numerical pattern, and proposed flood-Sinai coherence.
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 50.3 (2026), especially section 2.2 and Table 1 on animal, entry, water, destruction, and chronology doublets
Supports: Critique of standard flood source division and a final-form proposal concerning animal numbers, chronology, and editorial consistency; full restricted argument not assumed.
Biblical Interpretation and Method, chapter 1, pp. 2–14; official Oxford abstract and section outline
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Reader-facing Scripture wording, verse numbering, paragraph data, and supplied-word markup.
Exact location: Pinned eBible/CrossWire standardized 1769 KJV corpus, Genesis 7:1–24
Open source ↗hebrew text morphology and lemma data
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible — Genesis
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible Project
Open Scriptures, Version 2.2 released 2021; repository inspected 2026
Supports: Righteousness, clean and unclean terms, repeated numerals, wipe-away language, deep and floodgates, entry formulas, prevail language, breath of life, dry land, survival, and 150 days.
Exact location: Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible, wlc/Gen.xml, Genesis 7:1–24
Open source ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — Genesis with translators' notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, Digital edition accessed 2026
Supports: Prominent 'you,' seven or seven pairs, male-and-mate wording, seven days, forty days, paired entry, deep and heaven imagery, prevail language, fifteen cubits, breath of life, survival, and 150 days.
Exact location: NET Bible, Genesis 7:1–24 translator notes 1–39
Open NET Genesis 7 ↗modern open whole book commentary
Genesis
T. Desmond Alexander
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023
Supports: Final-form movement through ark entry, flood judgment, preservation, de-creation, and covenantal hope.
Exact location: Genesis commentary, section Genesis 6:9–9:17, especially Genesis 7 entry, flood, death, and preservation
Open source ↗modern critical open study guide
Genesis 6–9:17: The Flood — Study Guide
Joel S. Baden and Yale Bible Study
Yale Divinity School, 2021 course; page inspected 2026
Supports: Animal-number, water-source, entry, chronology, vocabulary, and divine-name doublets; influential Priestly and non-Priestly reconstruction; de-creation pattern.
Exact location: Genesis 6–9:17: The Flood study guide, sections 'The Problem with the Flood Narrative' and 'Two Flood Stories'
Open source ↗modern scholarly open ancient near eastern study
The Flood Story in Its Ancient Near Eastern Context
Shalom E. Holtz
TheTorah.com, 2014; updated 2026
Supports: Mesopotamian vessel, flood, mountain, bird, and sacrifice parallels and Genesis's distinctive violence, blessing, and covenant theology.
Exact location: The Flood Story in Its Ancient Near Eastern Context, sections 'Noah and Utnapishtim,' 'Noah and Atrahasis,' and 'The Relationship Between the Human and the Divine'
Open source ↗modern scholarly compositional and comparative chapter
Precursors to the Flood Narrative (Gen 6:5–9:17)
David M. Carr
Oxford University Press, The Formation of Genesis 1–11: Biblical and Other Precursors, 2020
Supports: Modern reconstruction of P and non-P flood traditions and proposed Mesopotamian precursors, used only at the documented level.
Exact location: The Formation of Genesis 1–11, chapter 6, pp. 141–177; official Oxford abstract and chapter outline
Open source ↗peer reviewed open final form and intertextual study
Sintflut and Sinai: Genesis 6–8’s allusion to Exodus 24–40
Zara Zhang
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 50.3, 2026
Supports: Current review of source divisions, competing harmonizations, final-form numerical pattern, and proposed flood-Sinai coherence.
Exact location: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 50.3 (2026), especially section 2.2 and Table 1 on animal, entry, water, destruction, and chronology doublets
Open source ↗modern scholarly source critical and final form chapter
Source Criticism: Putting Source Criticism in its Place: The Flood Story as a Test Case
David J. A. Clines
Oxford University Press, Biblical Interpretation and Method: Essays in Honour of John Barton, 2013
Supports: Critique of standard flood source division and a final-form proposal concerning animal numbers, chronology, and editorial consistency; full restricted argument not assumed.
Exact location: Biblical Interpretation and Method, chapter 1, pp. 2–14; official Oxford abstract and section outline
Open source ↗