Read the passage and its setting
Mark 5:1-20, King James Version
Italic words were supplied in the English translation for clarity.
Mark 5:1-20
Jesus Restores a Man among the Tombs
The Main Point
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
What Is Happening Here?
Mark 5:1-20 opens with “And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes” and closes with “And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and….”
Context That Shapes This Passage
How does this passage relate?
Mark 5:1-20In “Jesus Restores a Man among the Tombs,” the complete unit develops this passage-specific claim: In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Why this relationship fits: The reviewed reasoning path begins, “In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity” and concludes, “commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.”
What earlier material does it rely on?
Mark 4:35-41The successful crossing reaches Gentile territory, where Jesus' sea authority is followed by authority over an oppressive host and the restored man becomes a local witness to mercy.
Why this relationship fits: Mark 4:35-41 closes with “And they feared exceedingly, and said one to another, What manner of man is…”; Mark 5:1-20 opens with “And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country….”
Where does this sit in the whole book?
Mark as a wholeMark 5:1-20 belongs to the hearing-and-recognition movement where parables, powerful deeds, crowds, insiders, and rejection test perception. Its contribution is: In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Why this relationship fits: Mark 5:1-20 opens with “And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes” and closes with “And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and….” The reviewed movement runs from “In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity” to “commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.” The unit's reviewed main point is: In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Follow Mark's Narrative Movement
See why this section appears here and how the author's narrative movement leads to its meaning.
Why Is This Passage Here?
The successful crossing reaches Gentile territory, where Jesus' sea authority is followed by authority over an oppressive host and the restored man becomes a local witness to mercy.
Follow the Scene
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity
commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Why This Interpretation Fits
Narrative and structural evidence
Mark 5:1-20 opens with “And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes” and closes with “And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and….” The internal movement runs from “In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity” to “commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.”
Interpretive limit or uncertainty
The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
Understand the Meaning and Its Boundaries
Clarify the words that matter and keep the conclusion no broader than the passage allows.
Words That Matter
Legion
λεγιών · legiōn
Legion
What the Passage Is Not Saying
Reading Mark 5:1-20 in its complete Markan, Jewish, first-century, and Passion-shaped setting rules out these uses:
The story does not teach that mental illness, homelessness, self-harm, or disability is demonic.
Legion does not identify a modern army, ethnicity, or government.
The pig deaths do not authorize cruelty to animals or disregard for livelihoods.
Context check: In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
What Remains True Today
Jesus restores a violently isolated man to dignity, relationship, and truthful testimony of mercy.
Respond and Remember
Let the meaning shape life carefully, then practice explaining the section in context.
How This Should Shape Us
Why these applications follow
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Jesus restores a violently isolated man to dignity, relationship, and truthful testimony of mercy.
What faithful practice follows?
Meet self-harm, homelessness, and mental distress with safety, clinical care, community support, and freedom from dehumanizing labels.
A Concrete Example
A crisis team secures immediate safety, listens to the person, and coordinates housing and treatment instead of treating him as a spectacle.
Teach It Back
Explain Mark 5:1-20 in your own words. Include its place in Mark's movement, the decisive action or saying, one source-controlled uncertainty, and one use the unit does not authorize.
Your explanation stays in this browser. It is not sent or saved.
Go Deeper
The main explanation above stands on its own. Open these optional sections for fuller language, history, disagreements, and source locations.
Read it sentence by sentenceEach line inside the larger movement
Narrative and structural evidence
Mark 5:1-20 opens with “And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes” and closes with “And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and….” The internal movement runs from “In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity” to “commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.”
Interpretive limit or uncertainty
The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
Original-language wording and grammarTechnical detail appears only where it helps
Legion
The self-designation conveys oppressive multiplicity and may carry Roman resonance without becoming a secure political code.
How certain? probableWhat the first readers would have understoodRelevant history and culture
Galilee, Judea, Jerusalem, and Roman rule
Mark narrates Jesus and Jewish contemporaries within first-century Galilean, Judean, temple, village, household, synagogue, and Roman-imperial settings. For Mark 5:1-20, the needed reconstruction is bounded by: The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
How certain? probableWhy translations sometimes differMaterial translation choices
KJV wording in 5:1-20
The pinned KJV remains displayed. SBLGNT, STEP, and NET comparison clarify older English, syntax, and material alternatives where this unit requires them: The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
How certain? probableEarlier Scripture and inherited backgroundSupported quotations, allusions, and inherited ideas
Israel's Scriptures and Jewish life
Mark 5:1-20 belongs inside Jewish Scripture, worship, purity, Sabbath, kingdom, temple, Passover, prophetic hope, and debate as locally relevant. Christian interpretation must preserve that first horizon and reject antisemitic or supersessionist caricature.
How certain? strongHow this connects with the rest of ScriptureThe passage's own meaning remains primary
Synoptic and canonical relationships
Mark's own wording and sequence control Mark 5:1-20. Matthew and Luke often reuse or reshape Mark under the widely supported Markan-priority model, while Matthean-priority and other models remain alternatives; parallels may clarify reception but cannot overwrite Mark.
How certain? probableTextual variantsManuscript differences only when they affect meaning
Text and transmission
Mark's textual history is checked against the SBLGNT and NET notes. The material local control is: The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
How certain? probableWhere careful interpreters disagreeThe strongest options and their difficulties
Where do careful interpreters differ?
Best judgment: The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
How certain? probableTheology that emerges from this passageConclusions drawn after reading the complete section
Theological contribution
God's kingdom, Jesus' identity and authority, Passion-shaped service, faithful following, accountable power, mercy, resurrection hope, and care for vulnerable people control the theological use of Mark 5:1-20.
How certain? strongTheological contribution
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
How certain? strongCommon ways this passage gets misusedFair explanation, context check, and stronger reading
The story does not teach that mental illness, homelessness, self-harm, or disability is demonic.
A memorable line or action in movement 22 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Read Mark 5:1-20 as the complete unit, preserve The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
The story does not teach that mental illness, homelessness, self-harm, or disability is demonic.
Legion does not identify a modern army, ethnicity, or government.
A memorable line or action in movement 22 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Read Mark 5:1-20 as the complete unit, preserve The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
Legion does not identify a modern army, ethnicity, or government.
The pig deaths do not authorize cruelty to animals or disregard for livelihoods.
A memorable line or action in movement 22 can be detached from its actors, first-century setting, and Mark's Passion-shaped plot.
In Gentile territory Jesus confronts a self-destructive spirit host named Legion, permits entry into pigs that perish, restores the man to clothed sanity, and commissions him to tell God's mercy at home.
Read Mark 5:1-20 as the complete unit, preserve The narrative uses ancient spirit and imperial-sounding language; 'Legion' may carry Roman resonance without proving a political allegory. The pig deaths and economic loss remain morally difficult. The man's isolation must not be mapped onto mental illness.
The pig deaths do not authorize cruelty to animals or disregard for livelihoods.
Research trail and exact locationsThe source record behind this section
Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.
Mark 5:1-20, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.
Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 5:1-20
Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.
STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 5:1-20
Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.
NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 5:1-20 and attached translator/textual notes
Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.
Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 31–54, Mark 3.7–6.6a; subsection covering 5:1-20
Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.
Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 5:1-20
Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.
McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 5:1-20
Sources for This Section
These records identify the source, the claim it supports, and the exact location used. A source remains evidence to evaluate; it does not replace the biblical text.
Biblical text
King James (Authorized) Version — eng-kjv2006
eBible.org and CrossWire Bible Society
USFM archive eng-kjv2006_usfm.zip; source files dated 2026-08-19; downloaded 2026-08-24; archive SHA-256 aec1b3b26c622fd3d963d2bbac963016b9513246ffbfa20da00bb100372ea007; normalized corpus SHA-256 09aef51d90488aa7b9722b3fd9a93f4b25f6bf2064c5fd798fb39673c300ddf2.
Supports: Exact KJV wording, paragraph flags, supplied-word markup, and coverage.
Exact location: Mark 5:1-20, pinned eng-kjv2006 USFM corpus
Open source ↗Greek textual evidence
The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition
Michael W. Holmes, editor; Society of Biblical Literature and Logos
Society of Biblical Literature and Logos Bible Software, 2010
Supports: Greek wording, sentence relations, and material variants checked independently of the KJV.
Exact location: Faithlife SBLGNT official repository, data/sblgnt/text/Mark.txt, 5:1-20
Open the Mark Greek text file ↗Lexical and grammatical evidence
STEP Bible Data
Tyndale House Cambridge
Tyndale House Cambridge, repository snapshot verified 2026
Supports: Greek forms, morphology, and lexical ranges; context controls sense.
Exact location: STEP Bible Data official repository, TAGNT Matthew–Acts data, rows for 5:1-20
Open source ↗Translation and textual notes
NET Bible — Mark with translators' and textual notes
Biblical Studies Press
Biblical Studies Press, 2005–2026 online edition
Supports: Verse-level translation, syntax, older-English clarification, variants, background, and alternatives.
Exact location: NET Bible Mark PDF, printed pp. 1868–1901, 5:1-20 and attached translator/textual notes
Open the official NET Mark PDF ↗modern scholarly narrative commentary
Mark, Second Edition
Edwin K. Broadhead
Sheffield Phoenix Press; distributed online by the Society of Biblical Literature, 2009
Supports: Narrative boundaries, plot, characterization, kingdom, Christology, discipleship, conflict, Passion, and ending.
Exact location: Broadhead, Mark, printed pp. 31–54, Mark 3.7–6.6a; subsection covering 5:1-20
Open Broadhead's complete Mark commentary ↗modern scholarly book introduction
Mark course: summary, outline, background, introductory issues, theological themes, and Bible in the world
Paul S. Berge; revised by Kristofer Phan Coffman
Enter the Bible, Luther Seminary, 2023 revision; current online course inspected 2026
Supports: Authorship/date limits, whole-book movement, secrecy, disciple failure, Passion, Sonship, and reader-first context.
Exact location: Enter the Bible Mark course, Summary, Outline, Background, Introductory Issues, Theological Themes, and related passage index; applied to 5:1-20
Open the Enter the Bible Mark course ↗modern open confessional commentary
Mark
Mike McKinley
The Gospel Coalition Bible Commentary, 2023 online edition
Supports: A complete confessional evangelical interpretation used as one traditioned voice, not consensus.
Exact location: McKinley, “Mark,” Introduction and commentary heading covering Mark 5:1-20
Open McKinley's Mark commentary ↗