STUDresearch · Non-peptide
S-23
Also known as
S23 · S 23 · S-23 · S-23 SARM · S23 SARM · Mastorin (informal / research-chem trade discussion) · Ultrabolic (branded research-chem label discussed in forums) · (S)-N-(4-cyano-3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-3-(3-fluoro-4-chlorophenoxy)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide · s23
Community talk. May be wrong. Not medical advice. Not a protocol. Not for human or animal use.
Systemic SARM research chem.
The preserved range is highly variable and does not establish safety, product accuracy or a preferred schedule.
One author used this for four weeks after eight weeks of RAD-140 and with HCG throughout; claimed outcomes cannot isolate S-23.
The author also used testosterone and, at points, Anadrol; insomnia, hair loss and mood effects led to ending the planned near-eight-week period early.
Half-life & effect duration
- Half-life in the body
- Oral · ratsAbout 11.9 hours
- IV · ratsAbout 10.9 hours
- Felt duration people report
- Early accountPumps around days 3–4
- Longer stacked-use accountsDesired and adverse changes across 4–8-week runs
Tap a line to jump into the full notes. Research only — may be wrong.
Timing context & sources
Half-life in the body
No dependable human parent half-life was located.
A preclinical study reported an 11.9-hour oral half-life after 10 mg/kg in male rats, with 10.9 hours after intravenous dosing and 96% oral bioavailability. It cannot be converted into human timing.
Rat dose, species and contraception model; no human therapeutic or gray-market formulation pharmacokinetics.
- Jones et al. (2009): S-23 pharmacokinetics and hormonal male contraception in rats (opens in a new tab)PubMed abstract plus indexed full-text methods/results reviewed: male Sprague-Dawley rat 10 mg/kg oral and IV PK; oral and IV half-lives, bioavailability and contraception study context.Animal-only evidence; no human parent PK or approved use. Direct PMC page returned a browser verification page during review.
Felt duration people report
Reports do not establish a characteristic onset or felt-duration window.
One multi-author thread described pumps around days 3–4 at 10 mg/day, while detailed four- and near-eight-week accounts mixed S-23 with other anabolic agents and reported both desired and adverse changes.
Self-selected reports, unverified product identity, different daily totals and extensive co-exposure; no prevalence or causal timing can be inferred.
- What's your experience with SARM S23? (opens in a new tab)Multiple distinct authors reviewed: reported 10 mg/day split, 20–30 mg/day and higher-stack examples, with TRT, YK-11, Cardarine, tadalafil or tirzepatide appearing in different accounts; one described pumps around days 3–4.Multiple unrelated authors and protocols; unverified products, absent controls and incomplete labs; comments cannot be merged into one person's course.
- My experience with S23 with before and after (opens in a new tab)OP and visible same-author follow-ups reviewed: 20 mg/day split morning/evening for four weeks after eight weeks of RAD-140, with HCG throughout; claimed appearance, strength, aggression and libido effects plus later PCT context.Unverified product and outcomes, sequential/mixed cycle, HCG co-use, photos without controls, no clinical measurements; cannot isolate S-23.
- S23 cycle report ended early due to sides (opens in a new tab)OP and visible same-author clarifications reviewed: 20–25 mg/day during a planned near-eight-week period, with separate 30–40 mg/day attempts; testosterone throughout and brief Anadrol use; sleep, hair, mood, libido and strength claims.Unverified products, multiple dose changes and strong co-exposures; author was deleted; no labs or controlled attribution.
What people say
- Recomp talk: Strength and lean look anecdotes; confounded. anecdote
- Body-comp talk: S-23 is discussed for recomp, strength continuity, or soft-tissue recovery depending on class. forum
- Training confound: PRs and scale changes almost always co-travel with diet phase and programming. anecdote
- Suppression / lipid chatter: Hormonal agents pull bloodwork and PCT conversations even when marketed “mild.” forum
- Cycle thinking: Fixed on/off blocks dominate over indefinite daily use. forum
Doses people talk about
- Community bands: Often ~10–30 mg/day oral discussed — highly variable. forum
- Quality flag: Assume label accuracy only if analytically verified — gray market fill error is common. forum
- Product quality: Gray-market fill accuracy and identity are uncertain; dose math assumes the label is true. forum
- Route changes the math: Oral vs SC vs nasal are not interchangeable milligram-for-milligram stories. forum
- Start conservative (community): When people experiment, they often start at the low end of a charted band to gauge tolerance — still not advice. forum
- Framing: All figures are discussed trial, clinic, or community amounts — research/educational only, not prescriptions. forum
How it may feel
- Days 1–7: The inspected oral reports do not establish a uniform first-week feel. One multi-compound account described pumps by days 3–4 at 10 mg/day split; other reports emphasized later strength, libido, sleep, anger or hair effects under substantial co-exposure. forum
- Weeks 1–8: Actual posts described four-week and near-eight-week S-23 periods, but every detailed account inspected also involved testosterone, another SARM, HCG or other agents. Strength, appearance and adverse changes therefore cannot be assigned to S-23 alone. forum
- Day 1: No inspected account established a characteristic first-dose effect. Oral product identity, split schedules and extensive co-exposures make early attribution especially weak. forum
- Days 2–7: Side-effect window for many agents; benefits, if any, are easy to mis-attribute. forum
- Weeks 1–2: First honest checkpoint in self-logs. forum
Cycles people discuss
- Length: Short cycles + PCT lore common. forum
- Common pattern: Many self-protocols use weeks-on / weeks-off rather than indefinite daily use — cost and caution drive this more than hard science. forum
- No magic cycle: There is rarely one universal “correct” on/off calendar across forums. forum
- Reassess: Stop and reassess if adverse effects appear; this is not medical care. forum
Timing
- Dosing frequency: Often split daily in charts. forum
- Timing practicalities: People time doses around side effects, training, and sleep more than perfect PK. forum
- Published PK: Where human PK exists it should override forum half-life memes for S-23. trial
More on what it is
- Reputation: Forums call it one of the harsher SARMs — recomp + suppression stories. forum
- What it is: Nonsteroidal SARM research chem discussed for aggressive recomp and high suppression potential. forum
- Reputation: Often labeled “harsh” relative to Ostarine in forums. forum
- Research posture: Educational summary of public discussion and literature themes only. forum
- How people talk about it: Forum volume is a popularity signal for S-23, not proof it works for you. forum
- Research only: Not approved advice for self-experimentation; legality and access vary by place. forum
Stacks
- With YK-11: Sometimes stacked — risk stacking. forum
- Less is clearer: Solo runs make personal n=1 easier to interpret than five-compound blasts. forum
Storage notes
- No mix instructions here: STUDresearch does not list reconstitution, diluent volumes, or syringe unit charts. People reconstitute many different ways and vial labels differ — that content creates more confusion than clarity. forum
- Storage (general talk only): Unopened research products are usually kept cool, dry, and away from light per the seller label. Anything after first use is product-specific — follow the label, not a universal forum SOP. forum
Watch for
- Suppression: Strong HPTA suppression narratives. forum
- Lipids / aggression: Community cautions. forum
- Oral gray-market identity: The inspected accounts relied on labeled research products, not verified clinical S-23. Reported sleep, mood, libido, hair and suppression changes remain product- and stack-confounded. forum
- Unknowns: Long-term safety for gray-market preparations is often poorly characterized. forum
- Stack noise: Sides logged on multi-agent stacks cannot be blamed cleanly on one compound. forum
- Seek care red flags: Severe allergic reaction, chest pain, neuro changes, or uncontrolled BP/glucose need real medical care — not forum advice. forum
- Unapproved-drug status: SARMs are not FDA-approved for human use and are not legal dietary-supplement ingredients. This card maps forum talk only — not a sourcing guide, not a safety claim, and not a promise of results. trial
